206
submitted 3 weeks ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/world@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 67 points 3 weeks ago

They talk like he didn't threaten to declare war on Europe just a few months ago to invade Greenland. The world has been fed up with his shit for a long time now.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

Long past time to say it openly, but now is second best.

[-] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The big question is what, if anything, can or will they do about it.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 44 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, where's that '30 days before congressional review' thing? The us is full of shit. And not only in the white house.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 3 weeks ago

60 days, and it's not a review.

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

What do you mean it's not a review?

If a congressional comitee and a few invitees (such as POTUS) reviewing golf clubs together in a courtroom isn't a judicial review, I don't know what is.

[-] DandomRude@piefed.social 35 points 3 weeks ago

In essence, the world (and the media as well) should treat the U.S. exactly as it behaves: as a failed state that, like Russia, is ruled by organized crime, tramples on international law, and blackmails its former allies. One should not do business with such a country, especially since it is committing the most egregious war crimes alongside its genocidal allies in Israel.

It is a reflection of the lack of integrity in the political systems of other countries that no sanctions have been imposed on the US in response to its brutal actions in Iran - this war is just as much a war of aggression in violation of international law as the one Russia is waging against Ukraine.

Sanctions against the U.S. will, of course, not happen. But the barbaric behavior of the U.S. should at least ensure that Western countries turn away from the U.S. in the future, so that it cannot continue to exploit its power to blackmail the world.

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 9 points 3 weeks ago

First everybody needs to get their gold out of the USA, switch over all critical infrastructure and payment to home brew solutions and sell USA treasuries. Then the sanctions can start. But switching away from USA infrastructure in already a form of sanction.

[-] reev@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Stuff like Wero matters and is making actual progress. Once they open up to merchants I hope to see it being a realistic homebrew payment network.

[-] tristan@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 3 points 3 weeks ago

Definitely. The world was so quick to sanction Russia for its invasion, but the US faces no consequences for its actions…

[-] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Sanctions against the U.S. will, of course, not happen.

It would be more productive for the rest of the world to reduce its dependence on the US. This dependence takes a variety of forms and degrees but it’s this very dependence which makes sanctions impractical. It’s this very dependence which emboldens jackasses like Trump.

So just divest. Disentangle. If we could get there then there might actually be something we could do about a problem like Trump.

As things stand, it takes forever and a day to gather the will to merely speak out.

[-] JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think they also need to come up with a better term than 'western countries', to something that does not include the US but is open to include others. 'Countries that try to not be complete asshats'? Idk, the bar is in hell. But there are quite a few non-western countries that could fit the bill if it weren't for US fuckery.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Vorticity@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

They didn't lose patience with him like eight years ago? These people must have the patience of saints.

[-] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 weeks ago
[-] metakrakalaka@lemmychan.org 18 points 3 weeks ago

As usual, people are only upset with him because he's now costing them money.

The world is run by shitbags.

[-] orbitz@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

Well democratic (Western ones) countries don't often show how upset they are with other western countries unless it impacts them. They may not condone actions but I'm pretty sure none of them ever liked dealing with Trump.

There's that one picture of Trump in his first term sitting down while (I think) Merkle(sp?) was trying to explain something, there were other people in the shot and all (or mostly standing facing Trump) while he looked like a kid getting a lesson. They were okay for internal issues, well maybe not fine but mostly they wouldn't say anything, but this round he's fucked the world economy so yeah make sense. So I think they voiced their opinions previously as well just not in headlines as much.

Also the US has taken the lead so often, and (used to have) soft power that they managed properly.

Basically Trump (well his handlers) have effed up the social order so much it's time to set the line. Sucks it took this long, cause all should have been done first term when the US elected a petulant child as leader.

Though I imagine it comes down to money as usual as you said, cause heaven forbid we figure out a way to run a country without billionaires making their voice known.

It'd be great if the people's voices were heard for sure. Fortunately when time comes there are more of the regular folk than them. While I don't condone violence it sucks that they can use violence and legal issues to make their goals happen without pushback.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago

I think I missed this going by:

But the byzantine web of knock-on effects from Trump's pronouncements — let's not call them policies — in the past five weeks means that Russia is facing a huge boom in its finances thanks to the US decision to lift sanctions on Russian oil in a bid to ease the global market which, of course, is in chaos because of the Iranian response to US and Israeli attacks.

[-] Naich@piefed.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Trump is a Russian asset.

[-] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago

What are they gonna do about it?

[-] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

Dismantling a intertwined global system that has been built in the last 80 years can't be done in an afternoon.

I hate the US as much as the other people here, I want to get rid of them and their influence on us as much as the next guy, but its completely unrealistic to do it suddenly and in a speedy manner. Its a deep swamp and we are up to our necks in it, we need to dig ourselves out carefully so we dont sink deeper.

[-] nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

It’s a pretty good article, and, while the headline is pretty accurate, it doesn’t do the content justice.

[-] stolenfat@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

your comment, sir, was enjoyed

[-] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago

I lost patience 8 years ago when it was obvious he was a disaster for the commoner, and that the elites saw that disaster as a ladder. It's all been very clear for a while now.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 3 weeks ago

they should come out admit hes only doing this to distract from epstein files, but they wont, because they have people in thier own countries being named epstein files.

[-] manxu@piefed.social 4 points 3 weeks ago

... world leaders are increasingly just dismissing the US President, his offensive taunts and, more importantly, any notion that there is method in his madness.

There is something about this particular war that is bonkers erratic even by the standards of this lunatic. It's as if he had been goaded into it, told to start it, without any reasoning at all. There was no plan, there was no rationale, there was no goal, there was no warning, there was no consultation.

There just was a military force that did whatever it was told to do, without ever questioning anything about it - legality, operational effectiveness, long-term consequences.

Now I appreciate the countries that make a figurehead head of state the nominal commander in chief of the military. It's a really stupid idea to vest control of the armed forces in someone with real power.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

Rumour is he's in hospital. Wonder if we'll get the news by morning

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

one of the most annoying things is even if we get a "blue wave" and get maga out of the presidency and congress you know that two years in they will be loudly blaming whoever is president and the democrats as we are not doing great with all the infaltion and being an isolated country whos currency is becoming regional.

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 7 points 3 weeks ago

Does a strict two party system even constitute a democracy? There's so little incentive to do what the people want when the worst punishment is that you only have to wait until the other party fucks up worse than you did and then you're back in the game. In the meantime, just sit tight and snipe from the sidelines.

The Republican Party needs to cease to exist for what it's done. I don't know how that could happen but I don't see a bright future for the world if they're still around when the next Dem President starts to become unpopular.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

I have said they need to cease to exist and only the voters can do that. Them not winning even 25% of the legislature should do it. Many folk want to bring something forward over the democrats and I often say we pretty much have to eliminate the republicans first. dems would easily split in that scendario along with likely the greens taking office. actually that would be a good metric. If the republicans were down to just the nuttiest areas then if the greens could hold as much or more than them it would effectively eliminate them as their nuts would vote democrat over republican if the greens were a real threat which would drive the republican party even further down.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, when the Dems take back the power, and have to clean up the unholy mess that MAGA will leave, there will be very loud opposition, and the Dems are going to have to get over their obsession for politeness to traitors, and learn to employ the phrase "SHUT THE FUCK UP!"

[-] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If the democrats win as well as we're expecting they COULD take down billionaires and mass media propaganda machines that's behind all these right-wing movements...but I'm betting they won't. They probably won't abolish ICE, they won't stuff the supreme court, they won't cut off Israel, they won't roll back the insane power of the POTUS and executive branch, etc, etc.

This country is fucked for a generation at least, or as long as this two party government remains intact.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Y'all keep saying democrats as if democrats are one unified party.

its not.

Its 37 parties in a trench coat.

Thats the problem with the democrats. Its basically a Chimera built out of everything thats not-republican, and thats down largely to our two party system of bullshit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Foni@piefed.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

The only reason the alliances aren't formally broken is because moving investments and reorganizing supplies takes time. At least from the European perspective, it's only a matter of time; the moves to abandon Visa and Mastercard can only be interpreted that way.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
206 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55768 readers
143 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS