137

Late last year, a hidden trove of whisky was discovered in a cellar room deep within a 13th century Scottish castle. The liquid was subsequently tested and determined to have been distilled back in 1833, making it the oldest known scotch in existence. Now two dozen bottles of it are going under the hammer in a November auction.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 1 year ago

Can't wait for the worlds worst person to buy it

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 44 points 1 year ago

Hey it's your boy tik-tok Keith I just brought this Whiskey, and we're going to pour it down the sink

[-] vodkasolution@feddit.it 16 points 1 year ago

X Whiskey incoming

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I don't have the money for it.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 17 points 1 year ago

Scotch 1/4 as old as me costs $50. Scotch nearly half as old as me costs $250. Scotch as old as me costs $35k. Following that progression to four times as old as me suggests those bottles will command a sum that could change the course of human history by eliminating hunger or curing diseases or colonizing Mars.

[-] SARGEx117@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Reminder thay humanity has the power to end global hunger with both food resources and excess money to transport it.

We just choose not too because it's "too hard" and "too expensive"

Just don't ask who we, as humanity, owe the money to because you won't like the answer. It certainly isn't some galactic bank telling us we don't qualify for a loan...

[-] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Under capitalism, food isn't produced to eat but to make profits. When it's not profitable to sell, they will rather dump foods, starving the people rather than to plainly donate. We produce enough foods to feed the entire population. But the sole purpose of food is to not feed the people, but to feed the greed of the producers, the farmers, the corporates. Capitalism created an artificial scarcity of food where we produce too much food for the obese and throw the rest away to rot in front of the poor.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

It’s just a transfer of money, not expenditure of resources. The money doesn’t disappear when whoever owns the scotch gets it. Wasting natural resources and labor is much different and worse.

[-] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is only an 8 year Scotch though.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

My mistake. I skimmed it and got excited and thought they found forgotten casks, not already bottled Scotch. Since it's not a known label, I'm not sure collectors will care all that much. And it's probably not going to drink all that well as 8 years is on the younger side for Scotch. Depending on how well it was bottled, it might not be drinkable at all.

I'm sure someone will pay for the novelty, but this is way less exciting than I thought.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 25 points 1 year ago

'prolly goes great with diet coke' - elon

[-] alp@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago

~~prolly~~ Definitely goes great with diet coke.

FIFY, never forget his empty self confidence.

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Bloke in the thumbnail looks like he actually bored the label off that bottle

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Honestly, there's potential for a new meme template here

[-] ApeNo1@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

That’s just Ron Weasley after his Jay Leno poly juice potion started losing effect.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Reminds me of a movie, 'The Freshman' with Marlon Brando and Matthew Broderick. The Mafia tells people that they can eat endangered animals for $10,000.00 a plate. Naturally, there's a line of decadent yuppies a mile long waiting to get into the secret restaurant. [Spoiler] it's all goat meat, because who has ever tasted what real rhino tastes like?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I’ve been trying to think of the name of this movie. Thank you.

[-] sagrotan@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

As we see with our politicians: aging doesn't necessarily make things better.

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

$4.20, and I’m willing to go down, way down.

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

It honestly blows my mind that the oldest whiskey on the planet is only from 1833. I dint know why but it feels like there should be more and older.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 year ago

What can I say, humanity likes to party. All the booze is gone.

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Old wine turns to vinegar that's why the words look similar. All alcohol eventually turns.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm kinda glad because it means it got drunk. I hate seeing good whisky/ey sit on a shelf.

[-] casualPeeper@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 year ago
[-] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

The longer a whisky is aged, typically it is more expensive. However, aging only happens inside the wooden barrel. The whisky develops more flavours due to interaction with the wooden cask. There is diminishing returns to ageing the whisky longer.

This isn't what's happened here. The whisky was stored in bottles. These bottles shouldn't cause any ageing. However, these two ideas can be conflicted.

The value of this whisky is a taste of the past. A way to physically experience some history. People with an idea that things were better in the past may want to believe this was a better whisky.

I would guess this isn't going to taste better. Improvements in manufacturing, quality control and knowledge of whisky probably make a better whisky today. Any high end whisky is going to be better. However, these same processes make low end whisky cheaper and probably worse.

[-] diviledabit@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

If sealed properly the flavour of whiskey is extremely resilient so I think you are spot on about it being a way to experience whiskey history.

I would absolutely love to taste some of this stuff....the idea of tasting something from back then is very exciting.

I also expect you are correct in that wouldn't taste as good as a modern whiskey.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If you really want to taste something historical, go to Egypt. Ancient Egyptian honey is routinely found in tombs and is still edible.

[-] Baahb@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Difference between whiskey history and honey history is human input. Honey sorta happens without people. Whiskey does not. Millenia old honey, while neat, is still just honey. century old whiskey however contains all the choices the distiller made. It's almost certainly not made to a strict recipe, and it likely used ingredients we wouldn't today. Theres a lot to experience that has changed in distilling since it was distilled. Less so with honey.

Not knocking honey btw. Best honey I've ever had came from a backyard in Austin. I do recognize honey isn't created equally. Just that time doesn't really change what the bees have available so much.

[-] MycoBro@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Do they have middle aged women standing outside the pyramids handing out lil bitty spoons of honey samples? (I always go “mmmm..wow..I’m DEFINITELY going to get some of these now! Can I have one more?”)

[-] broface@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

"Just go to Egypt, brah."

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

So, lighter fluid, it tastes like lighter fluid.

[-] a_mac_and_con@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

There is the awful part of me who hopes someone accidentally breaks the bottle before it is sold.

[-] broface@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Remember, whoever buys this, for whatever price, feels like they're entitled to that money while children go without: food, water, shelter, electricity, and education.

They also have armies of useful idiots to defend them in the vain hopes they can join them.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Keeping it materially real. Don’t forget to have some fun though. :)

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago

Would be a king to come with oranges I forgot in the fridge last winter.

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

I can't get behind ancient alcohol. It's a curious finding, but at this point it's probably undrinkable. Like something you've forgotten in the fridge for too long.

[-] brb@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago

Would be a king to come with oranges I forgot in the fridge last winter.

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
137 points (94.8% liked)

News

23409 readers
1816 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS