18
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What the fuck is "half a pickup truck" for a measure

[-] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

Americans will use anything other than the metric system.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

As an american, I am 100% onboard on switching entirely to measuring things in terms of pickup trucks.

[-] Corngood@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago
  1. Preheat oven to 1 pickup truck
  2. Bake for 1 pickup truck
[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

F-350°F for F-150 minutes.

I think this could be an untapped cookbook market. Make it look like a shop manual and I’m in.

[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Since most automobiles are water-cooled, the pickup truck temp is probably about 110 f / 43 c, so you'd want to preheat to 3 1/2 pickup trucks.

Similarly, since the mean life of trucks is probably 20 years, we'd measure casual time in a subdivisions of 175,320 hours / 10,519,200 minutes. One picotruck would be 1/10th of a minute, so you want to bake for 300 pico-trucks

We will of course maintain this system once trucks become 50-year lived semi-autonomous drones that never get over 35 c, because the one constant in defining units is that rejiggijng definitions is preferred to technical precison.

[-] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Your oven will preheat in about 5 minutes, which means it's heading at 3pickup trucks per 50 picotrucks, or, once you reduce the units, 60 billion.

[-] k0e3@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

This recipe serves 2-3 pickup trucks

[-] tal@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is a Canadian publication.

EDIT:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Narwhal

The Narwhal is a Canadian investigative online magazine that focuses on environmental issues.[1][2]

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

yeah, we have fucking idiots who have no idea what a kilogram is.

[-] Deestan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe if we tricked them into saying, like, "as heavy as a three hundred kilogram box of bricks"

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't mind the "size of common everyday thing" for a news article. It gives an easy to understand measure of the scale.

It's the "half" part that is infuriating. Like, you couldn't just pick another common object of the right size? Like, I'm pretty sure you could just say "a sedan" and be pretty close to the size. Is this just AI writing titles?

Just another method of getting clicks. Writing stupid titles like "half a pickup truck sized" so people click it to understand what the fuck they mean.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago
[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't know why that's more frightening

Edit: I realized it's childhood trauma.

https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/Supreme_Commander

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Two of them is roughly the size of a pickup truck...

Like, it's volume, they could say X gallons, but it would be hard for people to visualize. So people use an example most readers would be familiar with.

Have you honestly never wondered why journalists use random things? Or has no one taken the time to answer before?

It's been common literally for centuries before either of us were born, but most likely all of human existence. Just with animals like buffalo instead of pickup trucks.

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You know what is roughly half the size of an American pickup truck and very common? A sedan. Like a regular sized car.

The annoying thing isn't using a common object to show scale. It's that they are cutting it in half. Like, you have other whole objects to choose from. It kind of ruins the point.

That's what frustrates me about the title at least.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That half giraffe really killed me.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

You know what is roughly half the size of an American pickup truck and very common? A sedan. Like a regular sized car.

Oh ok...

Seems like you have two problems:

  1. You have no idea how big an American pickup truck is

  2. Instead of asking questions, you make assumptions and hope someone teaches you

One is a much bigger problem than the other, I wish you best of luck with both tho.

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Mods want to explain why linking carsized.com and telling a commenter they are being pretentious gets a comment removed by mods?

Edit: Maybe it's my mobile app? When someone blocks you maybe it's confusing the comment thread? Idk.

Americans will use literally anything except the metric system 😔

[-] No1@aussie.zone -1 points 1 week ago

A normal car.

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How awesome would it be for Donald Trump, Joe Rogan, Dana White, and Elon Musk himself to get smashed by a Musk satellite during a photo op in the octagon at the White House UFC fight.

[-] athairmor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

If that happened, you could not convince me that we aren’t all extras in Idiocracy 2.

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean I’m drawing on other peoples comedic talent

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

falling from the the sky and burning is a good thing, bigger concern is them staying up there for too long

[-] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

falling from the the sky and burning is a good thing

Jury is still out on this one.

“We’re really changing the composition of the stratosphere into a state that we’ve never seen before,” said John Dykema, an applied physicist at SEAS, who warns that scientists today poorly understand many of the impacts.

https://salatainstitute.harvard.edu/burning-satellites-in-the-stratosphere-emerging-questions-for-climate/

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

falling from the sky onto things is a problem tho

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

communication satellites are low earth orbit to reduce latency, that means +25000 km/h velocity to sustain orbit, and would also have a very shallow entry angle, that combination means total vaporization

[-] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Low earth orbit is most survivable reentry trajectory… coming in at a higher angle significantly increases the heating.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

As was always the plan for these satellites.

The article raises a vague concern about Kessler syndrome. This is exactly why these satellites are designed to deorbit once their useful lifespan is finished. I don't see what the point of this article is at all.

[-] gnate@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Part of the plan, sure, but that doesn't mean it's a good plan. They don't have control of where the debris lands, and Starlink doesn't take responsibility for cleanup when it lands on others' property.

[-] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

The debris will be microscopic. It won't "land" anywhere noticeable.

The fine particulate matter may not be great for the ozone layer, but it's actually pretty negligible compared to all of the other pollution that we're not addressing either. That doesn't justify the pollution, but hopefully it helps contextualize it.

[-] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I don't understand what kind of capitalist pig you need to be to allow private companies access to low orbit.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago


just some random capitalist here

[-] glitch1985@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Is it regulated? What's stopping me from putting up a satellite?

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago
[-] glitch1985@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That's the apple thing right? I'm sure I can figure it out if I put my mind to it.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

yo momma would give you such a smacking

[-] glitch1985@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That's a risk I'm willing to take.

[-] CheetahHybrid@pawb.social 0 points 1 week ago

It's impossible to regulate space. Even if your government put restrictions on putting things in orbit, the company could just launch under the flag of somewhere else. Blanket banning of commercial space programs would require a universal treaty or would lead to an act of war. Im not saying the US shouldn't try and do something about space trash, but it's not as simple as "just ban corporations from space"

[-] yogurt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Space is extremely regulated, SpaceX just gets permits approved to do anything they want because they're extremely cooperative with the US military and CIA.

Rocket Lab is a private rocket company that launches from New Zealand, but part of the company is in the US so they still have to get an FAA license to launch from any country. No matter where SpaceX goes they would need FAA and FCC licensing.

[-] Ismay@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

There is like 10 launch site in the world. The fuck we can't regulate that ?!

We simply don't want to.

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago

Both construction and launch facilities are highly specialized and expensive, there's a reason only a handful of countries have them. You can't just ship your rocket to Micronesia and launch from a grassy field

You can't?

FINE! I'LL JUST GO HOME THEN!

[-] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago
[-] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

If you split it this way you end up with more than half of the weight, you need to split it down the middle through front and rear bumpers.

[-] flandish@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

naa. your mom is still on the pass side.

this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
18 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55863 readers
176 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS