56
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago

Expecting people to not sabotage the rolling death machines "too high a bar"

[-] FederatedFreedom1981@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

I was just going to say that the roads are for humans, not machines, but this is a better idea.

[-] this@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

All I'm gonna say is if you put a traffic cone on the hood of one it will refuse to move because they avoid cones at all costs.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan -2 points 1 month ago

But Waymo taxis are demonstrably safer than human drivers.

Maybe you're thinking of Tesla who's significantly worse than human drivers because they ditched LIDAR.

The only groups saying that are Waymo and Google.

[-] wpb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

But Waymo taxis are demonstrably safer than human drivers.

... says research paid for by Waymo.

I know critical thinking skills are in short supply these days, but come on.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 month ago

That's not critical thinking. It's making an assumption based on bias.

[-] Elextra@literature.cafe -2 points 1 month ago

I made a previous post about this. Anecdotally, I've seen numerous human drivers hit pedestrians in SF. Number of Waymos hitting humans that I have seen in local news or in person, none.

They are very very conservative with their driving in SF but can still navigate SFs complex streets (I.e. when a doordash is parallel parked theyre very good at driving around them).

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 1 month ago

That's why you have to standardize the statistics.

Humans are responsible for more total pedestrian crashes than robo taxis simply because there's more human drivers on the road.

Although the standardized statistics agree with your anecdotal observations in this case.

[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 month ago

I don't know why you are trying to defend human drivers so much. I share the road whit them every day and I hope to fucking God they all get replaced with robots soon.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 0 points 1 month ago

I'm not trying to defend human drivers; I'm all for all human drivers being replaced.

[-] bryndos@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

Sofas are even safer, but sofas should fuck off out of the bike lane too. And out of the bus lane too, but that's never going to happen.

[-] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 16 points 1 month ago

I guess necessary bike safety gear needs to include a brick

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I walk my dog with a pocket full of rocks to throw at cars.

Can’t afford bricks. There’s a war on.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago

Once you collect a poo bag from your dog, you can just throw that.

[-] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

I actually have a small but bright orange hatchet (I spray it to help keep rust off it and also to make it super easy to spot from the other side of my campsite) I keep on my bag, mostly for Camping, but I use the same bag when I'm on my bike.

I've started keeping it on, and have seemingly had less people giving me shit when I'm biking through town.

[-] guillem@aussie.zone 10 points 1 month ago

Respect goes both ways.

[-] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

People parking to drop others off or make deliveries is the most common use of bike lanes by cars/trucks. Why would I expect Waymo to be different? Thanks for saying it out loud, though?

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 7 points 1 month ago

And it's why bike lanes need a physical barrier separating them from the road, not just a painted line.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago

They don't respect bike lanes...

Do they respect bricks?

[-] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

No, but it might be gratifying to verify that information repeatedly.

[-] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Dude, expecting fucking HUMAN drivers to respect bike lanes is too high a bar.

[-] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

AI companies: Our AI is so powerful, it could take over the world if we don't regulate it

Also AI companies: Bike lanes scary

[-] Jiral@lemmy.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, if Waymo can't comply with proper street conduct, its services should be banned from public roads until they are ready and capable of complying with them.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

So it's a dead end technology then? Got it. Get em off the road.

[-] Cherry@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Totally out of curiosity as I ask a lot of questions. I’m assuming these also have to be roadworthy. Can they drive with a light out or a damaged or a missing windscreen wiper?

What kinda damage would take these out of action for small period? Or cost the most in terms of repair?

Also if one had a ‘I support Palestine action’ sticker on it, would it be considered a car displaying a terrorist message?

[-] Lanske@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Won't succeed here in the Netherlands then

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026
56 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21662 readers
490 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS