17

Say you were a guardian or parent and get to decide when a child can get a phone or use a computer and get internet with it. If you wish you can also install software and change router settings to what you see fit.

Some parents decide to forbid the internet completely, others are more relaxed. Some go the helicopter route, and some do not care whatsoever what their kid does online.

What is your policy on letting a child use the internet?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] troed@fedia.io 5 points 2 weeks ago

When they figure it out and become capable of reading and writing. Tablets, phones and computers are not locked down. Parental guidening and open communication means they know what it is, that there's good and there's bad content and people etc.

Working great.

/Swedish

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

I like this

[-] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

I wouldn't allow them to have a phone at all until they're around 12 to 14 (just like my parents). When it comes to the internet on a computer, the same thing would apply, but they can when supervised. If possible, their only web browser on their internet device will have uBlock Origin installed with custom block lists to prevent them from accessing websites they aren't supposed to. I would also like software (whether I'd have to program it if it doesn't exist or not) to prevent them from using their devices at bedtime. Not a father, but those are the basics of what I'd imagine I do. Expect one last thing: Roblox is completely out of the question. I don't care how much they beg. It's a predator nightmare so it would be completely banned

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago

Access to the Internet is not something that the parents are actually capable of restricting. As soon as one kid in the has a phone, their entire peer group is exposed.

The question isn't about restriction. It's about who will be teaching these kids about the Internet. The first kid learns from their parents; every other kid learns (mostly) from other kids.

If your kid is the last in their class to have a phone, everything they know about the Internet they will have learned from their peers. They sure as hell aren't going to tell you they already know about all the things you've been trying to hide from them.

[-] BranBucket@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Our policy was supervised / filtered only until early teens. Kids sites, educational stuff, games we purchased and approved of, etc. We were also late to give them phones, our son got his first because in his freshman year of high-school his band teacher set up a boiler-room to sell worlds finest chocolate and he was the only kid who didn't have a cell phone.

When we had "the talk" we discussed masturbation and porn, why porn is popular, and all the negatives that go with it without condemning it outright. We talked about online predators and not sharing things with people you didn't know, especially pics, addresses, etc.

My wife and I are firm believers that kids need space to discover who they are, so as they became teens, things went to semi-supervised. We paid attention to them more than their devices, but we had rules such as adding one of our emails as a recovery address to any socials they set up, so we could check up on them if we thought something bad was going down. Never had to use that, and I think just having it there made them think about what they did online.

Around sixteen/seventeen, no filter and no more backdoors into their accounts. Just a couple of long heart to hearts about how shitty things can be on the internet and how we're there to talk with no judgement if they need us.

[-] Flaco_waton@feddit.cl 1 points 2 weeks ago

What in the world is a boiler room to sell chocolate

[-] BranBucket@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Boiler room is slang for a room filled with shady stock brokers using high-pressure tactics to sell crappy stocks for fraudulent reasons.

When fund raiser time came around, his band teacher told everyone to take out their phones, call relatives, and try to get them to commit to buying x number of candy bars. It was like a little boiler room full of kids begging grandma to shell out $50 for mediocre chocolate.

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

A friend had an excellent (but evil) one.

His son had found some more... interesting areas of the internet (aka porn). He collected a selection of his browsing history and sat him down. They then went, video by video, having an open and honest discussion about it. Dad had FAR more tolerance for mortifying embarrassment than his son did. He learnt to clear the history at least.

The 2nd discussion, 6 months later, used the router logs instead.

I'm not sure I would use this particular method. However, it was apparently highly effective at making his kids think things through (for better or for worse!).

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

this is good because it teaches the kid the importance of privacy and the entire lack thereof online.

it's also nice to not freak out at porn viewing and to teach them it's ok in moderation.

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 weeks ago

🎵The internet is for porn🎶

And not at all for kids. No internet at all until like, 13. And then, with all the safety barriers possible. Before that age, maybe some online gaming (not roblox, just Minecraft) with friends.

Computers don't need the internet to be an enriching tool. Anyone remember reader rabbit? Encarta? The maze game? Time riders? Oregon trail? Age of empires? I learned so much using offline software.

[-] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You sit at a desktop in the kitchen to use the computer. If you have shown yourself to be responsible you know your password.

The wifi shuts off at bedtime.

My 11-12-13 year old kids have Apple Watches for communication purposes but no smartphones. These are charged all together in a locked pantry at night.

[-] Axiochus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

That sounds pretty draconian.

[-] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

A shared computer and no Internet when they are supposed to be sleeping is draconian?

[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago

Isn't this how us kids in the 1990's and 2000s grew up? (Minus the phone because we didn't have them, or just a flip phone)

Calling it draconian to not be able to stay up all night on the internet sounds kind of like an iPad kid as a teenager lol

[-] lifeinlarkhall@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yep. And even then, our desktop computer was upstairs - which was out of the way, nothing up there except my sister's bedroom and a living room that wasn't really used - so arguably that was too isolated lol. We weren't allowed laptops until we finished high school! Even my friend who did have a laptop wasn't allowed it in her bedroom.

The internet was also restricted to go off at 9pm because I was staying up on msn and Myspace all night otherwise 😅

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's not. No devices at night is super normal for kids who haven't learned to regulate yet. It's maybe a bit tighter than I would choose, but I still think it's a fair balance at that age.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I automate school, weekend, and summer schedules with parental controls on mobile devices.

They're just getting into computer gaming so they had to have the internet talk (but most of their games banned chat without ID anyway)

[-] czardestructo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

My daughter is 7 and no unsupervised internet, at most some YouTube videos. She gets tablet time but its just educational games and videos, mostly Khan Academy and PBS content.

Furthermore my wife is working with all the other moms to build a pact to keep our kids cellphone free as long as possible. Soon as one friend gets one they all want one.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Only with my eyeballs in presence. My son is autistic and barely verbal. He also has combination ADHD. I wish I could forbid the tablet entirely but it just doesn't work with a child facing these challenges. For example, he can't sit still through dinner so if we go out, he uses tablet until the food comes. He's obsessed with Legos. All the content he watches is Lego builds. He watches that on YouTube kids with me present to make sure he doesn't slip through the cracks. My eldest is 19 now and we let him access the internet unabated, that was a huge mistake I highly recommend people know exactly what their kids are watching and you should restrict traffic to safe content only.

[-] alakey@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Start educating them on what internet is and how it works early, before they even get to use it. Allow them to observe how you use it. Explain the good and the bad it can provide. I feel like a lot of how you should use the internet is just how you should generally live your life - stranger = danger, don't give your personal information to anyone at all (even if they claim to be me/my friend/police/whatever), understand how content engagement works and who benefits from it (ads and manipulation are everywhere, not just online), and so on. Ngl I'm kinda baffled how we navigated a much more dangerous real world "just fine" up until the internet has apparently become some unfathomable evil. By not allowing your kids to learn early, you are just gimping their future, they will have to go up against people who often literally don't know a life without the digital world. Not to mention - if you don't teach them the basics of understanding how to navigate the world and its dangers, they can get hurt whether the internet still even exists.

My one opinion that might be controversial is that I believe that by enforcing arbitrary blocklists (outside of just generally useful stuff like uBlock Origin) and restricting content without explaining and demonstrating anything you are simply conditioning your kids to be ok with surveillance and censorship.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I have an 11 year old son. He has neutered Internet that can do normal searches on. An hour budget a day for games. An hour for YouTube. Other than that he can talk to his friends on Discord or text. I check his Discord every now and then. He only talks to his buddies or my gaming buddies.

[-] utopiah@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

crontab, it's enough to :

  • kill any add during specific period
  • accumulate usage per app
  • check if tabs are opened

and it's pretty straighforward to configure, e.g.

* 8-17 * * 1-5 killall SlayTheSpire && date >> ~/shame
# prevents from playing during weekday working hours

or for accumulation (which can be reset daily, weekly, etc by simply deleting the minutes file)

pgrep mpv && >> mpv_minutes; if [ $(wc -l mpv_minutes) -gt 1000 ]; then echo beyond threshold; fi

That works also for turning up/down network interfaces.

PS: I use this on myself. I'm not a child but I don't have perfect self control. It works.

[-] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

You couldn't stop them if you tried, which instead will result on them using dodgy methods to access it, which puts them at even higher risk than if you gave them unrestricted access.

Teach them, teach them that the internet is both fucking terrifying and fucking terrific

[-] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, deliberately view the pain Olympics and one man one jar with them.

Give them the trauma they were looking for.

[-] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Mostly the former.

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 2 weeks ago

No internet.

I'm normally very progressive, but I think we've collected enough data to know for sure that the internet has no good outcomes on children's development. Furthermore, I don't want devices spying on children, so any device that eventually connects to the internet is also a nono unless it's been given an open source operating system and software or completely lacks the ability to record video, audio, or scan for additional devices.

[-] EuroNutellaMan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No unsupervised access to any techno-gizmo until they're like 7 or 8, besides a dumb phone to call me or mom or watching me play/do things, maybe play together sometimes or limit it to formative things. Ain't no hypothetical child of mine gonna be raised by an iPad and cocomelon, and since I don't necessarily trust other parents to raise their kids decently I would get them a dog or 2 to play and bond with.

Then, once they start being old enough I will give them their own tower computer, obviously with Linux, privacy-redirects, limited access to the internet (I'm mostly gonna let them access games, wikipedia and stuff that is formative) and their access to YouTube is gonna be via FreeTube with channels I think they'd benefit from watching as already subscribed (plus whatever interest I know they have). Throughout the time I will be teaching them things, indulging their curiosity and gradually explain, reveal and open up things to them. Of course I'd also secretly monitor what they're doing, not to judge but to make sure they're safe, until I know they can safely navigate on their own. As for phones they're getting something locked down with some custom ROM like /e/OS or whatever and just the bare minimum they need to function (Signal to talk to me and mom, calendar, alarms, etc). No social media for them, they at most get to see some of it via privacy frontends. I want them to grow up in a way that the internet is a place they can leave.

Once they've teenagers and understand things I'd start gradually letting them do their own things and gradually giving them more access, allow them to make mistakes and be sure to be there for them to learn rather than just punish. The goal is that by 18, when they'll have full access, they're digitally literate and can safely navigate on their own, or at least be as careful as 18yos can be. At that point they'll also have to gradually start paying for their stuff on their own.

[-] Strider@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Education education education.

Explain how the internet works. Explain companies. Explain evil intent and malicious behavior.

Imo, if you put your child under surveillance that's not the right way. If bad things happen despite good education, fine, introduce limits and guardrails.

Don't do things you wouldn't want for yourself. Be consistent.

Basically, do good parenting.

[-] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

As much as I hate the idea of exposing kids to the ideologies and mass propaganda of the internet, I hate the idea of incompetent adults even more. Plus, exposure builds resistance to some extent. How are they gonna learn to think for themselves if they haven't seen a wide range of views? Also, do you want your child to fail out of college the first time they play a video game? Or only start learning to code in their twenties? if ever since they won't think of a computer that way.

No way, if I was gonna have a brat, the little bastard would be damn competent at everything.

[-] xylogx@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

The kids devices have their wifi shut off at 11 pm each week day night. From time to time I will have them show me their screen time history and their Youtube watch history.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

The WiFi policy seems good. But the invasion of privacy will only alienate you from your kids because you show them you don't trust them. (You shouldn't! But you shouldn't let them know that.)

I watched some dank ass horror shit when the internet was young. Tub girl, one guy one jar, beheadings, all that kinda shit. I was just a teenager. I'm a highly functioning member of society. Good work, good pay, wonderful family. You teach your kids what's right and what's wrong and they'll go by that. But you gotta LIVE it too. Don't just preach it. Show them what's right.

My mother trusted me completely to do the right thing. She shouldn't have. But kids don't always do the right thing. But me knowing I had betrayed her trust a few times made me feel awful and I learned that it wasn't worth it. Doing what's right is cool, in the end. Kids figure this out if you show them the way.

And if they never learn what's right, they weren't going to no matter what you did, because it will have been outside influence that was too great, and that's just destiny, you could call it. Nothing you could've done.

Best of luck to anyone reading this.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

Invasion of privacy can be a good teaching moment.

Don't wait until they've embarrassed themselves: take them through their browser history before they've even thought about porn. Show them router logs before they include pornhub entries. Show them their tracking history while they were far away from you, out with grandma. Explain that you don't look at these things, but that this sort of information is available. That if they use their school's wifi it's available to their teachers. If they use their friend's wifi, it's available to their friend's dad.

Do it while the information isn't embarrassing, and they will learn to protect themselves, rather than be upset about your "invasion".

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

You can’t make a blanket statement like that. It really depends on the situation.
Our kids’ therapist insist we look at their history. But everyone is up front about it so they know it’s going to happen.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

This is a very obscured statement. Why does your kids' therapist insist on this? Very relevant information, if you ask me.

I didn't really mean for it to be taken as a blanket statement either. You know your kids better. I'm just saying what I believe to be true in normal circumstances.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My kids haven’t had normal circumstances.

A lot of kids don’t.

I would even argue what “normal” even is…

BTW: what are some ways that people can become parents? If your list is longer than one entry, you’re catching on.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You're right to ask for a definition of what "normal" means. That's relevant.

To me, normal means you actually wanted your kids in the first place, want what's best for them, you live in a relatively safe environment with western values (perhaps optional, perhaps not), with enough money to own devices where you can watch YouTube, in this particular case. That's about it.

Obviously not a blanket thing we can apply globally, no.

But trust in my opinion is worth it's weight in gold. Trust generates trust. Look at how cats show trust, by not really looking at each other at all, and acting relaxed by maybe sitting down and closing their eyes. Because if you are tense, and you keep watching the other cat, it means you need to see their next move in order to react to an attack. When the other cat sees the first one isn't a threat, they do the same thing. Perfect analogy to this situation IMO. Show your kids trust and they will reciprocate. Maybe not immediately but they will grow into it. That's what I believe. 🙂

[-] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

The internet is for communication. A child has no reason to communicate with anyone independent of their parent. No internet.

[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 0 points 2 weeks ago

dude where you do hang your iron crosses?

[-] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Wow, such a substantive argument. /s

[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 0 points 2 weeks ago

this is just an extremely fascist take

[-] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

So you say, and yet not any hint of how.

[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 weeks ago

so like half the people here (who are apart of the lgbtq community) would be dead without a way to communicate to others outside of "gay"-hating families

[-] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

'Killing people is bad and we should generally have rules against it.'

'But what if I need to defend myself?'

Do you think that limited circumstance warrant throwing away the rule? Or maybe, just maybe, we stick to the general as a general rule but excuse violations of the rule where it seems reasonable? The vast majority of kids are not endangered by queerness, and those that are should be helped, but the answer to a few kids needing help is not to open the floodgates on everyone else. Computers are great tools but the modern internet is no place for an unaccompanied child. It's probably not even good for adults, but adults can at least pretend to give informed consent in a way kids cannot.

[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 0 points 2 weeks ago

hey, we got a word for that, its called MURDER ban MURDER not kiilling

and do you have ANY IDEA how big the internet is?

youtube and those slopsites make up less than 0.0001% of it

"the internet" is like saying "the universe"

[-] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 0 points 1 week ago

Killing and murder are the same thing. Killing in defence is called justifiable homicide. Don't play language games.

[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 0 points 1 week ago

no they arent 😭😭😭😭

[-] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 0 points 1 week ago

Unreasoned denial and emojis. I'm not going to continue talking to a child. Goodbye.

[-] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 week ago
[-] HeHoXa@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago

Electronics are for amusement. If he isn't having fun (fussing), time to do something else.

We use it together and communicate during. Zombie mode --> time to do something else.

Great firewall of my house (whitelist). I'm sure he'll figure out how to bypass it one day, and hopefully by then I've raised him well enough to process the horrors of the open web.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
17 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39716 readers
190 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS