166

https://www.axios.com/2026/05/28/ai-spending-roi-enterprise-costs

Archive link https://web.archive.org/web/20260528114303/https://www.axios.com/2026/05/28/ai-spending-roi-enterprise-costs

Why it matters: Companies that rushed to embrace AI are now confronting ballooning IT costs, uncertain productivity gains and growing employee skepticism.

Driving the news: Microsoft canceled most of its Claude Code licenses, in part over costs, according to The Verge, and Uber's COO said AI costs are getting "harder to justify."

An AI consultant tells Axios one of their clients recently spent half a billion dollars in a single month after failing to put usage limits on Claude licenses for employees.

Companies are citing AI's ability to automate jobs as a cause for layoffs, though Anuj Kapur, CEO of CloudBees, told Axios that workforce cuts may simply be "the only lever they can pull" to offset their AI bills.

Consumer sentiment around AI is also nosediving, and employees are rebelling against the use of the technology at work. 

What they're saying: The enterprise is undergoing a "healthy swing" away from AI overuse — or "tokenmaxxing," the push to burn as many AI tokens as possible — Ali Ansari, CEO of model training firm Micro1, told Axios.

Ansari hopes this correction will push companies toward more efficient AI use.
While the market views these tools as working equally well across the enterprise, Ansari says "the reality of AI right now is that it only works for coding."
That disconnect can drive up IT bills without leading to high return on investment in agents, he said. 

Friction point: Corporate AI adoption is running into four unique problems.

Use cases: "Most people default to automating tasks they dislike rather than tasks most valuable to the company," Sophia Velastegui, CEO of Velastegui Ventures and former chief AI officer at Microsoft told Axios. Instead, they should focus on using AI to drive revenue.

Costs: One CTO told Axios that employees were using AI models to check the weather. That gets expensive fast: Enterprise AI plans are not truly 'all you can eat,' and even simple chatbot queries can carry heavy token costs.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] segfault11@hexbear.net 83 points 1 week ago

$500 million accidental bill, meanwhile people get fired for a few minutes of """time theft"""

[-] SoyViking@hexbear.net 80 points 1 week ago

Most people default to automating tasks they dislike rather than tasks most valuable to the company

CEO complains about class struggle

[-] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 49 points 1 week ago

I don't get it. Why wouldn't the employees like doing valuable things? Have you diverged your own interests from theirs?

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Me years ago when I spent 2 weeks writing a one off script to accomplish something that would take me 4 hours to do manually because I had nothing better to do at work

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 68 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This literally made me laugh out loud.

Companies are citing AI's ability to automate jobs as a cause for layoffs, though Anuj Kapur, CEO of CloudBees, told Axios that workforce cuts may simply be "the only lever they can pull" to offset their AI bills.

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 72 points 1 week ago

"Well, we're firing you all."

"To replace us with AI??"

"No it's because we spent too much on AI and now we can't afford you or AI"

[-] segfault11@hexbear.net 46 points 1 week ago

they could use their money more efficiently and increase productivity by giving it straight to nvidia for GPUs so the employees can game on company time

[-] hello_hello@hexbear.net 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Throwing AI licenses at the wall and seeing what sticks (or what Velastegui calls the "thousand flowers bloom" approach) isn't leading to tangible returns, she said.

costanza-maoist Make sure to not use chinese ai though because that would be unamerican.

Watch western AI companies just buy chinese AI and then rebrand it as american.

[-] daniyeg@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago

they don't even have to buy it, deepseek is free (gratis). i think it only has use based restrictions for military stuff.

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

deepseek does horny stuff??

[-] hello_hello@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago

3.4 You will not use the Services to generate, express or promote content or a chatbot that:

(5) is pornographic, obscene, or sexually explicit (e.g., sexual chatbots);

Volcelseek

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] daniyeg@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

first take a cold shower. second i don't know but it is not against the license if it does not violate any other laws. the license of deepseek-V3 (based on this) states:

attachment A


You agree not to use the Model or Derivatives of the Model:

  • In any way that violates any applicable national or international law or regulation or infringes upon the lawful rights and interests of any third party;
  • For military use in any way;
  • For the purpose of exploiting, harming or attempting to exploit or harm minors in any way;
  • To generate or disseminate verifiably false information and/or content with the purpose of harming others;
  • To generate or disseminate inappropriate content subject to applicable regulatory requirements;
  • To generate or disseminate personal identifiable information without due authorization or for unreasonable use;
  • To defame, disparage or otherwise harass others;
  • For fully automated decision making that adversely impacts an individual’s legal rights or otherwise creates or modifies a binding, enforceable obligation;
  • For any use intended to or which has the effect of discriminating against or harming individuals or groups based on online or offline social behavior or known or predicted personal or personality characteristics;
  • To exploit any of the vulnerabilities of a specific group of persons based on their age, social, physical or mental characteristics, in order to materially distort the behavior of a person pertaining to that group in a manner that causes or is likely to cause that person or another person physical or psychological harm;
  • For any use intended to or which has the effect of discriminating against individuals or groups based on legally protected characteristics or categories.
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] segfault11@hexbear.net 66 points 1 week ago

Costs: One CTO told Axios that employees were using AI models to check the weather.

fuck yeah

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago

is it warm yet? is it warm yet? is it warm yet? is it warm yet? is it warm yet?

[-] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

The thermostat is on the other side of the room, ergo I must burn AI tokens to use electricity to increase the global temperature.

it's too warm, when will it cool down, when will it cool down?

[-] LittleFellaNamedBoof@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago

Please, the tokenmaxxing meta can do better than this. Put a temperature sensor outside a data center running the AI then have the AI check temperature changes in real time and write essays on why it might be changing. As it works the data center rises temps and it has to write more as temps change. Self reinforcing token burning.

[-] john_brown@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago

You need to have another ai agent editing the essays and then another agent writing detailed critiques of each essay

[-] egg1918@hexbear.net 66 points 1 week ago

Maybe I should be using AI at work🤔

[-] Hell_nah_brother@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 week ago

Don’t you want to know the last digit of pi?

[-] Thordros@hexbear.net 63 points 1 week ago

I'm going through a tokenmaxxing phase rn. Profitcels about to get slopmogged, while I'm based and clankerpilled.

[-] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 54 points 1 week ago

chatPPB find a way to say "hell yeah GOOD post" in no fewer that 69420 words

[-] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 57 points 1 week ago

Probably would have been more environmentally friendly to just set up 500M in dollar bills on fire

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

In car tires even.

[-] jack@hexbear.net 55 points 1 week ago
[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 52 points 1 week ago

You forgot the most relevant one!

data-laughing

[-] hotspur@hexbear.net 54 points 1 week ago

I’ve read that Anthropic’s yearly revenue is in the single/double digit billions (want to say 13.5, but I’m not sure) so this company’s error would account for 4% (if my 13.5b is the number) of their yearly revenue in one month…

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 50 points 1 week ago

Tax the shit out of these morons. They and their companies are too stupid to be responsible for that much money. Take it away from them, and give it to the people. Start by forcing companies to kick back 50% of their gross profits to their employees.

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

They are basically setting money on fire. Taxing it won't do much. What's needed is the Chinese model where businesses can't fire workers to replace them with AI. That law is just as much for the protection of businesses as it is for the protection of workers.

[-] daniyeg@hexbear.net 42 points 1 week ago

yeah if i had unlimited token access i would just make it write my emails and documentation which it is semi good at rather than writing bad code that takes the same amount of time to double check as writing it myself. that might count as a productivity boost but it's probably not what they are after. "no we don't want to make your job easier we want to make your job redundant".

[-] LittleFellaNamedBoof@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago

I actually think the single most useful AI task is translating into corporate speak. You can say "Write an email telling Janet to go fuck herself but politely."

And it'll be like "Good Afternoon Janet, I hope you are doing well today..." bla bla.

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago

Janet: Summarize this email to the core of what LittleFella is trying to tell me.

AI: go fuck yourself

[-] LittleFellaNamedBoof@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago

EFFICIENCY!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 41 points 1 week ago

Data: When enterprises are hesitant to give AI agents unfettered access to proprietary data, those agents become less effective, Josh Pantony, CEO of Boosted.ai, which focuses on AI tools for finance, told Axios.

bruh

[-] daniyeg@hexbear.net 41 points 1 week ago

this reminds me of when AWS was the hot new thing and people did not understand you have to define a spending limit. how did people fuck this up AGAIN?

[-] segfault11@hexbear.net 40 points 1 week ago

they only care about optimizing costs when it comes to paying workers

[-] LittleFellaNamedBoof@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago

Because its not about the costs. It's about making sure workers stay desperate and destitute. So they can't organize.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 40 points 1 week ago

Many businesses are so unbelievably gullible when it comes to AI. They throw all existing performance indicators out of the window and only chase AI adoption about all else. Doesn't matter if it makes the employee more productive. Those burning many tokens are commended, those not using enough AI are fired.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 39 points 1 week ago

wow turns out if you're over leveraged on strategic costs, the vendor will notice

[-] fox@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago

I don't think it's possible to spend that much on tokens doing mundane work, which means they probably had a bunch of fucking openclaw and agentic bullshit going on churning tokens on the most expensive models 24/7.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago

I really don't know how google can afford what seems to be running chatgpt on every single search being done

Im gonna be real ive been searching all kinds of nonsense with the small but of joy knowing it's very expensive for them and i'm making them absolutely no money

[-] gayspacemarxist@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago

Google I get, they run the models on their own hardware. DDG makes no sense to me tho

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

That still costs money though so it's like why does google let me turn their search bot into a horny roleplay with a few simple "pretend you're doing this" commands while other companies charge a shitload for stuff like that and still lose money? to be clear i'm only doing the horny roleplay to lose google money, don't get the wrong idea, pervert

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Dessa@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago

The code formatting is difficult to read on mobile when the lines run long.

[-] Ildsaye@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

Not ideal on desktop either

[-] SmokinStalin@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

Hoping that thid was the hexbear here that was asking how best to sabotage their companies adoption of ai.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

Is that article slop? The structure is inhuman and the text is abbridged but lacks the clarity of a summary.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
166 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24384 readers
177 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS