-6

4 futuristic things the Humane Ai Pin can do as a smartphone alternative (mashable.com)

submitted 2 years ago by sanqueue@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 44 points 2 years ago

I am calling bullshit on all of their points.

No screen, but a projector to project on your hand? WTF? So not only will it far less information, but it will be a pain to use...
Voice commands? Meaning I will need to tell everyone around me what I am doing? Also calling bullshit on getting them to work in a busy area.
No it can't, there are no ways to detect nutrition from a picture of a peice of food
Privacy? Yeah, get back with me in 20 years when it has been proven to not sell, leak or have data stolen, then I'll be impressed.

In conclusion, this is as real as the Skarp laser razor is.

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

No it can’t, there are no ways to detect nutrition from a picture of a peice of food

Why not? at least to the extent that a human can. Some AI model recognizes the type of food, estimates the amount and calculates nutrition based on that (hopefully verified with actual data, unlike in this demo).

All three of these functions already exist, all that remains is to put them together.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 years ago

Ok, if you take any book, keep it closed, how many times do the letters s, q, d and r appear in the book?

There is no way to know without opening the book and counting, sure, you could make some statisticsl analysis based on the language used, but that doesn't take into account the font size and spacing, nor the number of pages.

Since the machine only has a photo to analyze, it can only give extremely generic results, making them effectively useless.

You would need to open the food up and actually analyze a part of the inside with something like a mass spectrometer to get any useful data.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I agree with you, but disagree with your reasoning.

If you take 1lb of potatoes, boil and mash them with no other add-ins, you can reasonably estimate the nutritional information through visual inspection alone, assuming you have enough reference to see there is about a pound of potatoes. There are many nutrition apps out there that utilize this, and it’s essentially just lopping off the extremes and averaging out the rest.

The problem with this is, it’s impossible to accurately guess the recipe, and therefore the ingredients. Take the aforementioned mashed potatoes. You can’t accurately tell what variety of potato was used. Was water added back during the mashing? Butter? Cream cheese? Cheddar? Sour cream? There’s no way to tell visually, assuming uniform mashing, what is in the potatoes.

Not to mention, the pin sees two pieces of bread on top of each other… what is in the bread? Who the fuck knows!

[-] knotthatone@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

It isn't as magical (or accurate) as it looks. It's just an extension of how various health tracking apps track food intake. There's usually just one standard entry in the database for mashed potatoes based on whatever their data source thinks a reasonable default value should be. It doesn't know if what you're eating is mostly butter and cheese.

How useful a vague and not particularly accurate nutrition profile really can be is an open question, but it seems to be a popular feature for smartwatches.

load more comments (8 replies)

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

If i had a big list or directory of a lot of well known books and how many times s, q, d and r appears in them then sure I would be able to make a very good estimate on how many there are from just looking at the cover of the book, with a slight variance being in the editing that version may have. Almost like how a specific type of food will likely have a certain amount of protein fibre etc, with slight variations based on how the cook prepared the food.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

But then you have opened the books, missing the point.

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

I didn't open the book, someone else looked into the book and wrote it down for me to then read when needed, just like how someone would put in the data for a program to look it up when asked.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

That changes nothing, you had the book inspected and hot the data.

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

I think you're missing what I'm trying to say.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

No, you are hung up on trying to read the book without actually reading it.

That breaks the puzzle, since the device would not be able to anslyze the inside of an item of food from a pucture of the inside, and can only use highly generic data based on what it can assume from an image of the outside

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Re-read the first one I sent.

You can get a pretty good generalisation if you know what the food is. How do you think current apps for tracking nutrition work? All that this will do is just try and figure out what the food is from the picture rather than the user typing it in. Most foods you can tell what it is without "looking inside". I'm pretty sure there's apps that do that now, this isn't something new and groundbreaking.

And for nutrition you don't need to be 100% exact when tracking it. Because you can't be 100% even if you do know exact ingredients and how much of each one. Everything always has a variance. This method doesn't need to be perfect for it to meet the needs of most that will use it.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago

I agree that you can get a generic value of nutrition from a photo of a simple, fruit or vegetable, but since a pie/cake contains soo much stuff that looks identical to other stuff, rendering any photographic analysis useless.

So yes, you can get some idea of the nutrition of some foods, but way too low to be useful.

[-] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

You have to talk aloud so that you're included in the distinct lack of privacy this thing has.

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

I hate it. I don't want to speak to people who are wearing one.

[-] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

I feel like that with being photographed. Being in a room full of smartphones, and associating me with them in a large database somewhere. Having someone's kids use tick tock on my home network. Etc etc. We are massively under corporate surveillance, and I despise it.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

I'm going to actively avoid people doing so, and I feel like others will as well.

If someone walks up to you and they're filming you on their phone, how would most people react?

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Fortunately there's almost no chance of this thing getting off the ground

[-] Eggyhead@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

What if it looked like a Star Trek communicator?

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I... I've never really watched Star Trek. I think I could get into it but I've just never really sat down and watched it. I've probably only seen an episode or two in my whole life.

I'll see myself out.

[-] kalkulat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

What if it looked like Iggy Pop? Zac Efron?

[-] Eggyhead@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I'm just imagining people walking around with smart Iggy Pop badges and having AI conversations with them.

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Ai Pin has a "prominent Trust Light" which turns on when the device is in use.

Let's all place bets: What will be the first mod or patch for this device? 🥷🏽

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 years ago

Literally a piece of tape.

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Those raybans that some have mentioned here will literally disallow you from recording or taking a pic of it detects something in the way of the activity light. We don't know what physical tampering may accomplish though.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

It's a neat idea, but frankly, I don't want or need other people hearing my business. It needs to pair with (smart?) earbuds.

[-] phorq@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago

Yeah, this whole product is an exercise in doing things not because it's more practical than what we already have but simply because we can... for $700 + $24/month... No thanks...

[-] dmtalon@infosec.pub 4 points 2 years ago

It supports earbuds from watching a random YT video about it that popped up on my feed from the creators

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

For some reason this is making me wish Jobs were still around.

I’d hope he’d have some subtle burns about this product … maybe about how we’re visual animals and you can’t just throw out decades of progress on screen tech and call that innovation. Maybe something about how we’ve got one voice but 10 fingers and two eyes.

[-] kalkulat@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

A built-in 13-megapixel ultra wide-angle camera can be used to capture photographs and videos I bet other people won't like the camera any more than they did with Google Glasses.

Photos can be viewed using the “Center” website on any web browser. Want to see photos? Gotta go to the website. All photos therefore shared. Along with notes, music listened to, reminders .... Nuh-uh!

[-] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Another tech that is going to be utterly irrelevant as AR glasses become a mainstream reality like it or not.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 19 points 2 years ago

as AR glasses become a mainstream reality like it or not.

Just like the segway was going to change the way we build cities?

Or how cryptocurrencies will replace national fiat money?

Or how google glasses have already become a mainstream reality?

Or how everyone will watch TV in 3D all the time?

Or how everyone will play games in VR?

Just because a technology is possible it does not mean it will become ubiquitous.

[-] Eggyhead@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

Hey, I still believe VR is gonna happen... someday... :'(

load more comments (6 replies)

load more comments (5 replies)

[-] MudMan@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

I mean, it's fun that a techbro thought "isn't the TNG combadge cool?" and actually went and made it, but this was a Youtube video, not a product launch.

[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The Meta Ray-Bans have a better path to success than this. (Honestly, if they weren't tied to Meta, I'd love to get a pair.)

Mike Elgan had a great piece of why this will not take off:

https://mikeelgan.substack.com/p/why-humanes-ai-pin-wont-succeed-676

He makes a ton of great points.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

deleted

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Nah

load more comments

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023

-6 points (44.4% liked)

Technology

73234 readers

1469 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws