233
How the hell does a nation even dig itself out of this disinformation / conspiracy theory rat hole?
This shit is so depressing.
Get money out of politics. Nothing will fundamentally change until we accomplish this.
I think this is the rather depressing truth.
For starters, stop treating these people as serious people, regardless of position or economic/political standing. This clowns and his kind should have their mics automatically cut off and all interviews immediately ended the moment they start bringing this shit up with any level of seriousness. We have to stop treating them as sane people with valuable opinions worthy of attention the moment they start spouting fucking reality denying nonsense like the mental patients they are.
I think it will have to be a long coordinated fight and grass roots involvement. There is a lot to fix.
He is nothing but an embarrassment to Louisiana. His FB page is filled with what sounds like drunken rantings.
Just a quick question, how would one go about embarrassing Louisiana? Seems like a tall order...
It would be very very hard, but Rep Higgins certainly makes it look easy.
I often think House seats should be smaller, there used to be 33k people per district, now it's over 700k.
But fewer people per district would make for some idiosyncrasies and guys like this make me think we have enough weirdos in the House as is.
A sizable reason for the current state of eccentric weirdos in the House is the Gerrymandering happening all over the place. Makes it way easier to win based on notoriety and the letter next to your name alone.
Op’s solution would fix that
It can help. But smaller districts can still be gerrymandered.
It's harder and less effective with more districts, however.
Fair enough, but there would be vanishing small returns because math.
I think it would balance out because those idiots might be more numerous, but they would have less power. So maybe a few Representatives would be looney, but they wouldn't be able to get much done against the even larger ranks of sane members.
Well, you’d hope
and then you discover... all the other loonies that get elected, too.
I agree, but we'd have to restructure how the House does business.
The current count of Representatives is 435. If we were to go back to old ratios at 30k, we'd have 11,300 Representatives.
We'd have to break it up into smaller, constituent houses, or something.
Too many people to bribe
If we went back to 210k people per Rep it's about 1555. 210k is the ratio last time apportionment was done in 1912 or something like that.
The math isn't the point though. Republicans won't budge regardless because any increase damages their inherent advantage.
Conservatives should love this, as it's part of the Original plan right?
Uncap the house. More reps = less power per rep.
I will ALWAYS err on the side of diluting power. Always, All ways.
Fucking traitor and psycho
That’s like 99.9999999% of all repubs.
There are lots of these angry, stupid people. Some of them are at high levels of government--for example Clay Higgins. Democracy in the United States is in grave danger. Millions of Americans have abandoned reality and want bloody revenge on their perceived enemies.
Christ, what a shitweasel
🎶 Your recent lie
Didn't go your way
Who you gonna blame?
Ghost buses!🎶
Another republicunt trying to convince me that I’m the idiot. No, fuck you. I have eyes in my head and I am able to observe and accept physical reality. Fuck off and die.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
“I asked you, ‘Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the Capitol on January 6, prior to the doors being open?’ You responded. I quote again, ‘I have to be very careful of what I say,’”
I'm going to guess Higgins has never heard of the term "ongoing federal investigations". If, for example, the feds are currently investigating the Proud Boys, Wray answering that question would put those investigations at risk and possibly risk exposing any undercover investigators that are on the case. Even his statement of "I have to be very careful of what I say" is all but an admission that at the very least, some kind of investigation is going on.
When you absolutely, positively have to have an insurrection on short notice, who you gonna call?
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
233 points (97.9% liked)
politics
19097 readers
1665 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS