749
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ertebolle@kbin.social 122 points 1 year ago

This feels very much like an /r/thathappened post

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 112 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As a running enthusiast whose varied from running ~25 miles a week to having to restart from nothing, what the guy is talking about is extremely common. I've followed many different plans from many runners, sometimes their names are attached, sometimes not, and most of them I couldn't tell you what they look like. I will say Olympic runners are the most common. I've even come across hers. Nothing about this rings as implausible to someone remotely interested in the topic. I guess I could understand from a total outsider perspective, but from someone who looks into that topic often? Absolutely plausible. I see no reason not to believe them.

Edit: the amount of stories Tony Hawk posts like this and never gets questioned also just makes me wonder a bit about why multiple people have already commented the way you did.

[-] PownyRyda@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't a guy analyze a guy's training instead of a women's? I don't run but I'd imagine that training would be at least a little different for women than it is for men.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

Not really. I'm sure elite performers, possibly. But training plans aren't generally gendered from anything I've come across.

[-] Ghoti@geddit.social 18 points 1 year ago

I’ve never paid attention to the sex or gender identity of who writes training programs if the credentials check out

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Or maybe he's an analyst.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Zorque@kbin.social 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This feels very much like a /r/nothingeverhappens comment.

[-] danwardvs@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 year ago

Inside you there are two wolves.

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

God damn it Moon Moon.

[-] Repossess6855@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago

One smokes crack, The other smokes crack.

You are addicted to crack.

[-] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

It's a good day at the Furry convention.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] average650@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago

Why not tell him? Who wouldn't love that?

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Someone who makes assumptions about women and confidently tells them how they should be doing the things they are already doing.

[-] average650@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

Just sounds to me like he's passionate about something. I guess he could be an ass, but to jump to that conclusion from just "you should train high milage" and then providing analysis is really a bit much.

My dad would be that guy, but he's a running coach and was a marathon runner for like 50 years, so he loves talking about it.

There definitely wouldn't be any thought of, "you're a woman so you need advice," since he'd do the same thing to a man.

In fact, if we actually accept this completely unbelievable story, the fact that he's pulling stats from Women runners shows he's not being sexist.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Ryan213@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

I find this hard to believe...if the guy's doing analysis, he'd surely know who she was. He'd be a big enough "fan" of running to even start doing analysis. Man, the internet is just full of BS.

Anyway, I'll pretend this was real and it's kinda funny.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Absolutely not. I've followed plans and couldn't tell you what the person looks like. It's usually not about knowing a lot about the person but the popularity of the plan. And I've come across hers so at least in my opinion, it's a common one. I find this no different than the countless stories Tony Hawk says that border the same concept. He just gets believed a lot more easily for whatever reason.

[-] noqturn@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Idk, I’d believe it. I’ve been involved in a few sports to the point that I’m doing deep diving into elites trainings out of curiousity. For some athletes, the only picture I would see is a small thumbnail profile pic that was basically indecipherable, or they would be in athletic gear with hats and such. I definitely wouldn’t recognize them on the street, and it would be a crap shoot if I’d recognize them on an airplane. The only ones that I’d have a shot at are Alex Honnold, Tommy Caldwell and Andrew Skurka.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kemsat@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

The expression should be “I had too much heart to tell him.” A person lacking heart would have told them, gleefully.

[-] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

No, "didn't have the heart" doesn't mean you don't have heart, just means you have a different kind of heart, so it works fine.

[-] Uli@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

I had too many hearts to tell him. My blood pressure is through the roof.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

This happens a lot in the firearms community. I get told about x, y, z guns and how they function. But I have all those guns and have trained on the less accessible. I own full auto legally but every other day I'm told I can't own one. People be dumb.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
749 points (95.5% liked)

Don’t You Know Who I Am?

3812 readers
1 users here now

Posts of people not realising the person they’re talking to, is the person they’re talking about.

Acceptable examples include:

Discussions on any topic are encouraged but arguements are not welcome in this community. Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.

The posts here are not original content, the poster is not OP and doesn’t necessarily agree with or condone the views in the post. The poster is not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

Rules:

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Censor any identifying info of private individuals in the posts. This includes surnames and social media handles.
  4. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  5. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum. If you wish to discuss how this community is run please comment on the stickied post so all meta conversations are in one place.
  6. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  7. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  8. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  9. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

PLEASE READ LEMMY.ORG’S CITIZEN CODE OF CONDUCT: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

PLEASE READ LEMMY.WORLD’S CODE OF CONDUCT: https://lemmy.world/legal

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS