159
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 133 points 1 year ago

Speaking of Biden’s age, did you know that his opponent is a 78 year old rageaholic with the diet of an unsupervised 9 year old?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

One is an out-and-out unapologetic fascist and the other is an old grandpa.

I'd rather have the old grandpa. The worst he could do is die.

[-] Bearigator@ttrpg.network 44 points 1 year ago

Honestly, him dying is very real concern to me. If Republicans keep the House and he passes away, I can certainly see somebody trying to do something to Kamala Harris, as the Speaker of the House is next in line after the Vice President.

That said, I'd vote for Joe Biden if he was fucking 110, if the other option was Donald Trump. Or any Republican honestly.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I just wish any party could put forth a candidate actually worth voting for.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Hamburders VS. Ice Cream, man

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago

Old > Fascist

This isn't even a question for me.

[-] Wodge@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Don't forget that Donny is also old. So Old > Old Fascist.

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

But he's so much younger than Biden /s

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

It's sickening to me that after 7 years fascism is even still an option at all, not too mention one of the two electable parties in this country.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I suspect that what made it possible in the first place is difficult to fix in a short timeframe unless you lose a war and are discovered to have committed genocide on a massive scale.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

I find it interesting the same people who complained about Biden's age in 2020 have nothing to say about Trump being that age for the next election.

And by "interesting" I mean "holy fuck, you all are in a cult and need to stop worshipping the orange-spray-tanned shitty-comb-over fascist."

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 34 points 1 year ago

What a non-issue. Yes, people are making a lot of hay out of Biden's age, but where's the evidence of his mental decline? He's always been a bad speaker, but I haven't yet seen evidence that he's forgotten where he is or that he's confusing issues like Trump.

Fine, we'd like younger candidates. That's fair. But that's not reason to call Biden's competence into question.

[-] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Bidens age is reason enough to challenge his competency just on the alone fact that science have proven that there is a large decline after I think 70. I do agree there needs to be an age limit for the president so I obviously hold a bias for that but as far as which way I lean I have no interest in that stuff.

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago

Fine. His age is a reason to check. Which is why I ask for any other signs of mental decline. But the only evidence I've seen anyone put forward is his age, and that alone is not enough. As long as he remains competent as well as the incumbent, this line of criticism just boosts right-wing talking points.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

Yeah, he's too old. So let's vote for the guy who's 3 years younger and screw the policies...

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Mickey7@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

The determining factor is not age but competency

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 20 points 1 year ago

While I think the determining factor is if I want my kids to have a democracy.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The determining factor is not age but competency

If that were the case, Trump would never have won a race for local dog catcher, let alone POTUS.

load more comments (41 replies)
[-] 8bitguy@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Perhaps any candidate, irrespective of age, should undergo a trusted, impartial cognitive test as a condition of candidacy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think we need to establish a "skin in the game" rule for federal office. If your age exceeds the median life expectancy of the national populace at the time of the election, you are unqualified to serve. If you want to participate in shaping the future of the nation, you have to have a future yourself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

I’d rather old than fascist.

But, fucking hell, why can’t the fucking Democrats think farther out than one fucking election!?

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

Democrats have a great bench for the future, but not next year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can we just elect someone who's already dead at this point?

Because I think FDR's exhumed skeleton could get a lot more done than a mostly dead neoliberal like Biden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

Both the candidates are too damn old. The US is run by people who can't remember where they are. It's an utter disgrace.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I’ll take an old fart over a maniac sociopath.

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the only people with questions about his age are the media who keep bringing up questions about his age

hell id take jimmy carter now than any of the republicans

[-] Harpsist@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Christ. My mom is 65 and can't be trusted to answer the phone without giving out her credit card and SSN.

"umm, yes, Mr Bidin, I'm calling from Microsoft regarding your iPod usage on the cloud, can I please get the launch codes for your nuclear devices for verification?"

[-] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

At the very least we can be sure the iPhone he's undoubtedly using is the secured one provided by the government. Unlike the walking info hazard that was his predecessor.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
159 points (85.0% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2087 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS