315
Ahh, I see. So their real purpose all along in releasing footage was to use it as propaganda, not to get to the truth. Is anybody surprised by this?
Most of us assumed this the moment he announced its release.
As I said when Johnson released the footage, it's not going to be any change to what know really happened, there's just going to be all sorts of wild conspiracy theories coming out of idiots seeing blurry images and claiming false things, and the fact checks will disprove them but the fact checks don't get spread to the people who believe the false claims.
Worse, those people have convinced themselves that fact checkers are "deep state," so the presence of fact checkers debunking their claims they just take as further confirmation, because "why would the deep state have to try and debunk something if it wasn't true in the first place?"
These people have left object reality and we can't keep pretending that we can bring them back with truth and logic.
Edit: typo
Kinda like religious absolutists
"any argument against my faith is the devil tempting me"
It is unclear exactly what Lyons is holding in his right hand when he flashes his palms.
It is 100% clear what Lyons is holding in his right hand when he flashes his palms. It's a vape.
@snaptastic, don't forget to check my comment for relevancy.
Jesus. I don't even vape and I can tell what that is just from seeing people use them around town.
What's the deal with the snaptastic thing? Keep seeing it.
Jesus Christ between tagging that dude and using the tritest non-comment in history ("I bEt YoU'rE fUn At PaRtIeS") you sound exhausting as fuck
In the picture I saw it looked like one of those card deck shaped vape pens with the mouthpiece sticking out of the top.
It’s absolutely a box style vape mod.
The cons latch onto some of the dumbest things ever.
And of course, they cannot even be consistent. At the same time as this dumb Qanon-style idiocy, they also cry about how they are "political prisoners" and get wood at the idea of the orange blob pardoning the insurrectionists.
I’m not sure I’m following the comments. It was republicans who made the badge claim, so doesn’t this hurt them?
Can't prove them wrong if they close their eyes and put their fingers in their ears.
Not certain I'm following your question well: R's and randos started the claim that j6 had an undercover agent involved and that there's a video,that was just by R's, released that proves that. If you're watching disinformational videos, then adds to the idea that J6 was a setup and that R's are trying to ve transparent. This article clarifies that the video doesn't show an agent at J6.
Only if their supporters cared about facts. Considering we're talking about MAGAs/republicans, it's safe to assume the truth is immaterial to their talking points.
Every word uttered by a conservative is deception or manipulation. Every word. Honesty has never been a conservative trait.
Does it matter? They won't admit they were wrong, they'll double down.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
CLAIM: Security camera footage from Jan. 6, 2021, shows a federal agent disguised as a supporter of then-President Donald Trump during the attack on the U.S. Capitol.
The footage shows Kevin James Lyons, a Chicago man who was sentenced in July to more than four years in federal prison for his role in the attack.
THE FACTS: After House Speaker Mike Johnson on Friday began releasing thousands of hours of footage from the Capitol insurrection, social media users — including members of Congress — seized on a clip they claimed proved that undercover federal agents participated in the riot.
“And that ladies and gentlemen is a badge… with a red hat and fully disguised,” reads one post on X that shared a screenshot of the footage paused as Lyons is flashing his palms.
In another, he sits in a car holding a framed photograph from Pelosi’s office, which shows her with the late Congressman John Lewis, a civil rights movement icon who died in July 2020.
More than 700 have been sentenced, with roughly two-thirds receiving terms of imprisonment ranging from three days to 22 years.___This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online.
The original article contains 601 words, the summary contains 214 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
This is actually a bad summary, misses important points like: the misinformation refers to a clip in which Lyons shows his palms in a way similar to how an agent flashes a badge. No badge was really in hand and we was sentenced for his participation in the protest.
That is often true of this bot.
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
315 points (98.2% liked)
politics
18870 readers
3857 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS