202

Party leaders said a motion to oust the 35-year-old will be debated on Thursday and go to a vote on Friday.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 85 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I honestly think this guy is fucking hilarious.

Like, what an amazing asshole, to just be such a blatant fraud, and then basically just give the whole country the finger, and then put a suit and tie on every day and.not mention it.

It's truly a marvel.

Edit: I bet his glasses don't have lenses, you know?

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He's a symptom of a party that has no morals or moral fortitude Santos could rape a baby on the house floor and gates would be like "he's just doing what Biden is thinking".

The GOP has the power to end this. They just don't care, really.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Politicians used to resign over minor scandals that had nothing to do with their behavior on the job. Hell, just over 20 years ago, that party raised hell and impeached the sitting president over a blowie.

Now they cover and encourage for blatant corruption, theft, incitement of violence, etc. Openly and proudly.

And their fucking base applauds them for it.

I know "the world is going to shit" is a time honored tradition for those getting old, but shit man, this seems different.

[-] books@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

The crazy part is how many other people do this day in and day out and we never know because they aren't hounded by the press

[-] MoogleMaestro@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I think it's less the press's fault and more a side effect of how absolutely clear George Santos' corruption is.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Right? Just blatant, "You'll have to drag me out, kicking and screaming" energy. Til then, he'll just keep doing whatever he wants.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 5 points 1 year ago

On some level I wonder if he has some kind of undiagnosed mental health issue and can't wrap his head around reality, and then is driven by a lying compulsion disorder. His level of lying about just about everything (and sometimes contradictory lies about the same thing), for no apparent reason, just seems to be compulsive at this point. And like Trump with his crime compulsion, getting into politics is shining a giant spotlight on him that anyone that could do critical thinking would see would lead them being caught/called out/held accountable.

[-] flipht@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

There's a concept in politics called the gish-gallop. Also called firehose of lies. It's a time honored tradition, but in the past it was usually multiple people spewing crazy shit until they got called out too hard, at which point they'd quiet down and someone else would rotate in to take the heat.

With the way congressional districts are drawn, and now that they've seen Trump successfully accomplish this as a single person, to me the simplest explanation becomes that these liars lie because they know there won't be any immediate consequences, and that the more they can squeeze out, the less likely any given piece of it will be addressed.

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It’s called being a Republican… there’s no cure.

[-] joyjoy@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

They're probably gonna make a tv series about this whole situation. I'd watch a show about a guy who bumbled his way to the Senate.

[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 12 points 1 year ago

Conagra (who own popcorn giant Orville Redenbacher) stock is up 2.8% in the past month. Coincidence? 🍿🍿🍿

[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The speech he made on the floor kinda made sense...

I think this guy is a criminal, who will get convicted, should probably just resign, and will eventually get kicked out, but all of the people who have been removed from Congress previously had convictions.

It, imo is a dangerous precedent to set to start removing people without full-due process.

That said ,I'm not really following his stuff they closely so maybe he's had some level of due process within Congress that would warrant expulsion.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Would be hilarious if he tossed the Mike Johnson from the speakership to stay in office.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Finally, the Smiths and Rodger will be reunited after this seasons cliffhanger. But will Rodger be thrown in prison as well?

cues American Dad theme

🎶Good morning USA🎶

🎵I have a feeling it's going to be a wonderful day🎵

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I actually wonder what is worse: That he did the things he did, that he didn't leave on his own after being found out, or that they failed to kick him out not only on the first, but also on the second attempt.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

this is a great example of creeping normality

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Among the many allegations in its final report, the panel accused him of spending campaign money on Botox treatments, OnlyFans purchases and vacations in the Hamptons.

He is currently facing 23 federal felony charges, including wire fraud, money laundering and theft of public funds, as well as separate allegations of campaign finance violations.

The Democratic measure is an "insurance policy" intended to force a vote if Republicans do not bring up their own resolution this week, its co-author Robert Garcia told Axios.

Several members, who previously voted down expulsion until the House ethics panel completed its work, told US media they are reversing their positions and now support Mr Santos' removal.

He added that he would introduce his own expulsion motion against Jamaal Bowman, a Democratic colleague accused of pulling a fire alarm to sabotage a vote.

Mr Bowman, who paid a $1,000 fine over the incident, shot back with a statement railing against "another meaningless stunt in his long history of cons, antics, and outright fraud".


The original article contains 675 words, the summary contains 167 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] kool_newt@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I wanna see him spill details on other members.

this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
202 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1535 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS