64
submitted 11 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 29 points 11 months ago

“Even if you’re working and your wages are up, your rent costs more, your groceries cost more, your gas costs more, everything costs more,” said Tedd Rossman, senior industry analyst at Bankrate.com. “So people don’t feel like they’re getting ahead."

Inflation is how it happened. People can't afford to live and there will be a reckoning when the bubble bursts. The rich steal at their own peril, capitalism must consume itself.

Also, Tedd, people don't feel like they can't get ahead because they can't. That's not a feeling, that's a fact.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 14 points 11 months ago

I REALLY hope we are not going to have a repeat of the 1930's.

[-] Wooster@startrek.website 6 points 11 months ago

Serious question:

Would anything short of that lead to reform? I’m not eager for a second Great Depression, but considering we can’t even pretend to get climate change under control, I can’t see the 1% changing their policies until it hurts them, and bad.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago

I doubt it ww3 going to lead to fallout or madmax. Maybe now that the boomers are dropping finally we can see some change. I don't see any reforms happening until 2028 and then it will take years to go into effect. I'm hoping the reductions of population is going to save us.

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

Now way, it's gonna be way worse.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

We had to do a refinance of our mortgage to cover credit card bills. And it wasn't enough to cover the thousands we owe in medical debt. Ain't America grand?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If you don't mind me asking, what do you mean by "had to?"

Turning unsecured debt (credit cards) into secured debt (mortgage) is such a generally-regarded-as-bad move that I couldn't imagine doing it unless I was ordered to do so by a court. Given that a having a mortgage implies that one already owns a house and therefore doesn't necessarily need good credit in the same way a renter does, I suspect I'd be more inclined to just default on the unsecured debt instead.

That goes double for the medical debt (including avoiding even transforming it into credit card debt), since IIRC it's even harder for the creditors to collect on and in some cases is no longer even allowed to affect your credit score.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

"Had to" because we couldn't keep up the payments any other way. We're down to a single income, which doesn't help. And my wife- who technically owns the house herself- has impeccable credit. Defaulting on the debt would destroy that. If we want any hope of moving, we have to be able to afford a mortgage. We can't do that yet even though we want to, but if she defaulted on the debt, we'll definitely be stuck here forever. Defaulting on medical debt may not affect her credit rating, but defaulting on credit card debt sure as hell would.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Hmm, I can see how having a desire to move in the short term would change things.

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
64 points (100.0% liked)

News

23311 readers
1129 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS