961
usb formatting (sh.itjust.works)

shamelessly stolen from nixCraft on mastodon

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dasnap@lemmy.world 109 points 11 months ago

Your USB is probably named '/' or '~' so give that a go.

[-] impolitecarry@lemmy.wtf 74 points 11 months ago

When you hit enter on the DD command, and your main storage light suddenly starts flashing.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 53 points 11 months ago

When you hit enter on the DD command, and your eyes suddenly start flashing.

[-] 567PrimeMover@kbin.social 56 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Little Jimmy wanted to try Fedora, But little Jimmy is no more. For what he thought was his external drive, was actually his cerebral core

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=ajW2fDy41fY

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

That was great :D though I'm afraid that this is kind of me, considering I have a file server on my vacuum robot

[-] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

So? I'm just creating an 8 GiB swap file.

[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 months ago

Try btrfs, where with only 5 hours of research you can create a swap file without writing the entire file.
Also there is no other option, the 5h are non-optional.

After doing that twice, In my / now lives

/swapfile-howto

# this is btrfs not a normal file system.
# We have to create and allocate the file in a btrfs friendly way,
# and tell btrfs to not move or segment it.

touch /swapfile999
chmod 600 /swapfile999
truncate -s 0 /swapfile999
chattr +C /swapfile999
fallocate -l 999G /swapfile999
mkswap /swapfile999
swapon /swapfile999 -p 200

[-] ashe@lemmy.starless.one 11 points 11 months ago

I admire your dedication, but you really could've just done this

btrfs fi mkswapfile --size 16G /swap
swapon /swap
[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago

Huh, thank you for telling me, I'll amend the file with that info. This being a thing will probably spare many the troubles I experienced.

I did some digging to reconstruct what happened in my case. The file was created on 2022-12-08, and I remember this being after I rediscovered my earlier approach, from - going by my browsing history - mid september 2022. I worked through plenty of wiki pages at the time, including the btrfs docs on swapfiles, where I probably got my commands. The truncate in there to fix earlier mistakes is something I would keep in, but not add myself, so I must have copied that pages solution. Interestingly, going by archive.org, between dec 02 and dec 13 the documentation on btrfs fi mkswapfile was added to that page.
I am in no way confident in my memory here, but I vaguely recall seeing that command, and being somewhat surprised to not remember it from earlier. That confusion may have even contributed to pushing me to create the file.
Had I seen it, I probably would have tried the command and seen it not exist. Following the note of btrfs 6.1 being required, I would have checked the version and seen that my distro didn't have btrfs-progs 6.1, not even as an alpha on the development channel.
I may also have remembered there being multiple commands needed earlier, and not wanting to deviate from the proven method dismissed the apparently simpler method.

To complete this very meaningful and productive story, on 2022-12-23 my distro got the early christmas present of btrfs-progs 6.1 as an unstable release in the dev channel. After many retractions and republishings of a total of 4 subversions, on 2023-03-04 the first stable release of 6.1.x was made available.

I was 6 months early. Or rather the btrfs devs were 6 months late.

Edit (actually not edit because I didn't send yet):
I actually checked the repo and the documentation changed on dec 06. Here is the commit. The corresponding release occurred on dec 22.
Dumping 30mins into writing this actually resulted with a memorable story. By chance I stumbled over the documentation of a new feature, 2 days after it had been written, but 2 weeks before even the first alpha release containing it was created.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 72 points 11 months ago

You used something called disk destroyer, and you just found out why

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 51 points 11 months ago
[-] stjobe@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

That was an interesting read, thank you!

[-] Molten_Moron@lemmings.world 7 points 11 months ago

I haven't touched dd since I read that about a year ago, super interesting!

For people that use dd because they like the progress bar, I highly recommend pv.

[-] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Except the proposed alternative should not be cp or pv, but dd bs=4M oflag=direct,sync status=progress.

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills with all the advice in this thread, because for USB keys you will otherwise end up instantly filling the write cache... which will block the apparent progress of the copy operation (so why even use pv since all you're doing is measuring your RAM speed and available cache size) as well as heavily slow down (even potentially partially freeze in some circumstances) the rest of your system as the kernel is running out of free pages and can't flush caches fast enough due to the slow-ass write speeds of usb keys.

* (Alternatively there is a kernel setting somewhere to disable caching globally for a block device... but in most cases caching is good, just not when you're flashing an ISO).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 11 months ago

Another advantage of having a NVMe SSD, hard to confuse /dev/nvme0n1p2 with /dev/sda1

[-] bzLem0n@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 months ago

It's even easier to prevent confusion if you use /dev/disk/by-id/ id's, it only took a few times of overwriting the wrong disk to figure that out.

[-] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago

I think that does the opposite for me lol

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 7 points 11 months ago

I just make use of my paranoia, so I triple and quadruple check. Then get a coffee and quadruple check again. Never messed up once

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Even if it's similar names I'd normally plug in USB, do dmesg, then issue a command with latest device name.

[-] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 11 months ago

Fun fact: you can use cat image.iso > /dev/device and it (should) just works.

[-] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 52 points 11 months ago

Yay, more ways to (accidentally) destroy my data!

[-] PoolloverNathan@programming.dev 8 points 11 months ago

Or pv if you want a progress bar.

[-] AffineConnection@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Assuming /dev/device is not a symbolic link, you might as well

cp image.iso /dev/device
[-] ExLisper@linux.community 2 points 11 months ago

Sure, if you're a little bitch.

[-] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 30 points 11 months ago

That's why it called dd: don't dare

[-] gunpachi@lemmings.world 21 points 11 months ago

I always use the status=progress argument.

[-] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

That ain't why that light isn't blinking.

[-] uis@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Because this USB stick doesn't have light

[-] foyrkopp@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Anyone who hits enter on a dd command without triple-checking it gets exactly what they deserve.

[-] Hupf@feddit.de 14 points 11 months ago

I always prefer the bulkier /dev/disk/by-id/ symlinks because of this

[-] hemmes@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Goofoyou, goofoyou!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
961 points (98.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21281 readers
486 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS