259
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) said Sunday that the United States needs to accept that Ukraine will likely need to “cede some territory” to Russia to end the fighting. Vance told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “State of the Union” that he is opposed to sending more aid to Ukraine because he does not believe the country will ever be able to overpower Russia. He questioned why sending billions in aid to Ukraine is going to help the country at this point in its war against Russia, considering previous aid has yet to end the war. “What’s in America’s best interest is to accept Ukraine is going to have to cede some territory to the Russians, and we need to bring this war to a close,” Vance said. “But when I think about the great human tragedy here, hundreds of thousands of Eastern Europeans innocent have been killed in this conflict. The thing that’s in our interest and in theirs is to stop the killing.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 145 points 9 months ago

"Look, Russia will stop fighting if Ukraine just gives up the two 'contested' provinces."

"Okay, Ukraine gave them up, but Russia now says it only wants these three more."

"Look, Russia is being very reasonable. They will stop all the fighting and even allow Ukraine to join NATO if they just get these five provinces."

"Ukraine is just a tiny country now. They might as well submit to Russian rule."

"Russia just wants this one tiny province in Poland. Is that really worth starting WW3 over?!!!"

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 91 points 9 months ago

"France needs to accept that American Colonies will 'cede some territory' to Great Britain" Nobody could ever overpower the British Navy.

[-] koolkiwi@lemmy.world 50 points 9 months ago

"We just need to accept that the Sovjet Union will cede some territory to Nazi Germany, the Wehrmacht just can't be overpowered."

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago

"We should just let Japan have Hawaii. What more could they do?"

[-] ares35@kbin.social 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"Taiwan belonged to them anyway. Let China (PRC) have it."

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Whatever happened to the Roman Empire? Mesopotamia could use some aqueducts.

[-] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 82 points 9 months ago

Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) said Sunday that the United States needs to accept that Ukraine will likely need to “cede some territory” to Russia to end the fighting.

The problem is that if you reward Putin for his efforts, you only empower him and dictators like China and Iran. China will go after Taiwan, and Iran will go after Syria.

Because after all, they don't have to beat the US military, or even war exhaustion from the people. He just has to outlast the greed of the American Senators.

Which compared to the 800 billion we spend on the military, or the $300,000 you can bribe a senator. It would seem that Russia has chosen the more economic approach.

[-] Something_Complex@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Not to mention that public opinion in Russia is changing too...we had the advantage long term. We have half of the world's resources not to say even more...

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 76 points 9 months ago

No we fucking don’t. If putin gets anything he wanted he’ll do it again

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

Putin has arguably already had a large chunk of what he wanted since 2014. There's been so much time to not only reinforce Crimea and Donbas militarily, but also to change the population makeup by moving in thousands of Russian families.

I hate Putin as much as the next rational human being, but even a pro-Ukraine perspective has to reconcile with the fact that some of these formerly Ukrainian lands are now populated by a large majority in favour of being part of Russia. Even if Ukraine could gain full military control over these areas, it wouldn't magically get rid of the separatists.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dharwin@kbin.social 75 points 9 months ago

The killing would stop if Russia simply withdrew. But the Republicans never mention that as an option. Funny that.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 17 points 9 months ago

Article 5 is just a suggestion

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 66 points 9 months ago

“Bullies get what they want and there’s nothing we can do about it”

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago

"We like bullies because we want to be like them"

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 57 points 9 months ago

how 'bout no

and we give them more weapons to stop this nonsense

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BillDaCatt@kbin.social 46 points 9 months ago

Look! A republican waving the flag of surrender. What a fucking coward. He's not from my state and I'm still embarrassed that he is in Congress.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 45 points 9 months ago

Hey Vance... STFU you weak spined russian apologist...

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 38 points 9 months ago

He picked up a message on his morning jog at the usual dead drop. It said “announce that Ukraine will need to cede some territory to Russia”

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 23 points 9 months ago

They don't need a dead drop. Republicans just collaborate with facist authoritarians way out in the open. Their base either doesn't care, makes excuses for them, or actively root for a christofacist dictatorship to take over and destroy democracy.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/dec/10/hungary-viktor-orban-republicans-ukraine-aid

He wasn't a senator at the time so JD Vance wasn't on the infamous republican 4th of July trip to meet with putin.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/395719-gop-senators-visited-moscow-on-july-4/

Oh but what's this? His companies helping to spread Russian propaganda? Wow, it's always the ones you most suspect.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/31/us/politics/jd-vance-peter-thiel-rumble.html

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago

Worthless republican traitor.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago

And by "some territory," he means "everything between Russia and Poland."

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 14 points 9 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hoanbridgetroll@midwest.social 33 points 9 months ago

What a spineless traitor to humanity.

[-] Introversion@kbin.social 15 points 9 months ago

He’s a Republican. But I repeat you.

[-] digeridoo@lemmy.ml 29 points 9 months ago

We accepted it in 2014, when Russia took Crimea, hoping that would satiate their dreams of the Soviet Empire and here we are nearly 10 years later. The Russian government does not act in good faith, and if we don't crush their capability to wage war we'll see them try to take the rest of Ukraine and beyond.

These guys may as well be the modern day equivalent of Neville Chamberlain.

[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

The one sure way to end the fighting is to fund Ukraine's defense. When the right defunded Ukraine's defense, they didn't do it to promote peace, they did it to advance the interests of their allies (that is, Putin).

The reality of 'ending the fighting' is going to mean the violence will continue in the territory Russia controls, even after the 'hostilities' as such are ended. When Russia gains some territory, the russification of that territory involves punishing the people there for not having surrendered more quickly, liquidating institutions of local culture and replacing them with Russian ones, the separation of families, the internal displacement of locals on trips to the far east that many won't survive, the 'political reeducation' camps, etc.

When US politicians try to pass off enabling a certain genocide as an 'end to hostilities' or in anodyne terms like 'cede some territory', don't let them do it. They're not acquiescing to the inevitable, they're actively partnering in genocide.

[-] Slappula@lemmy.zip 27 points 9 months ago

Thanks Neville Chamberlain!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

"Chaps, anyone with a name like Hitler can't be all bad. What do you say we give him another chance?"

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Neville Chamberlain has been reappraised by historians, based on later released evidence, who argue he made that decision in part based on expert military advise and political considerations.

They knew that war was almost inevitable, but appeasement gave them time to build domestic political and public support, and prepare for a while longer. For example, this arguably allowed them to gain air supremacy:

... the Royal Air Force had two major weapons systems in the works: better interceptors (Hurricanes and Spitfires) and especially radar. They promised to counter the German bombing offensive but were not yet ready and so appeasement was necessary to cause a delay. Specifically, regarding the fighters, the RAF warned the government in October 1938 that the German Luftwaffe bombers would probably get through: "the situation... will be definitely unsatisfactory throughout the next twelve months".

So this guy's worse than Chamberlain. He wants to engage in appeasement, reward a dictator for agression, help a Chinese and Iranian ally, without any real strategic benefit to the US.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

United States needs to accept that Republicans work for Russia now.

[-] Introversion@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Democrats know and are mad about it. Republicans know and are happy about it. 🤷‍♂️

[-] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Nah, not an inch. Fucking Republicans.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

Go live in Russia then you dumb fuck. People here should start throwing you out if windows.

[-] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

When did the right go commie?

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

Never they just understand that putin is a capitalist dictator and that’s what they’ve always respected

[-] satanmat@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

They didn’t go commie… they’ve gone authoritarian….

At the extreme ends of the political spectrum, there is little difference…

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Nah, horshoe theory conveniently forgets that there are two other corners on that map. There are extremists of all flavors.

What you speak of is ONLY authoritarians. There have been "left" authoritarians, but every action of an authlritarian is a step away from being actually left. You cannot promote freedom while taking choice away without being a massive hypocrite. Spoilers: China, the USSR, etc, etc... They were/are all MASSIVE hypocrites.

A massive movement to violently effect political reform is VERY difficult for normies to parse through. Authoritarians and saviors, the difference is in whos words you believe. There are many gullible people. Even well-intentioned and planned coups have basically all resulted in more or different authority, not less.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

The traitor party, rePutincans, want to give russia some money, power, and oil? No shit?

Well, we’ll see what Moscow Mitch has to say about that! Oh wait.

Oh and fuck republiQans, fuck russia, and fuck the mushmouth corporate news who can’t find the wherewithal to pronounce an insurrectionist fraudster rapist as an insurrectionist fraudster rapist because WHY USE THE RIGHT WORDS when we can serve their republiQan owner/masters by pretending both sides bad? FUCK.

[-] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

As an Ohioan, I apologize for my state unleashing this feckless sycophant on the national political discourse. Unfortunately, our Democratic challenger was less exciting than a bowl of tapioca.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

We have a boring governor here in washington and it's awesome. I don't agree with everything but meh, it's little stuff and who cares. I'm sad he's retiring.

[-] satanmat@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Putin says that the US needs to accept that it will cede some territory back to Mexico; the states of Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and southern California, should not cause any issues to the northern states as …..

[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

I don't understand why the GOP is okay with strengthening the Kremlin, who identifies as our adversary, by allowing them to steal valuable economic land that has major strategic geopolitical ties. They were always supposed to be the strength and might party... And Russia is clearly not that mighty so why is that the ship they want to jump to?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

How much dirt does Putin have on Vance? Apparently a lot.

[-] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

This is what happens when countries rely on the US for foreign aid. We are unreliable.

Other countries need to increase their own funding if we are dropping the ball. We are not the only nation in the world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Let's give Russia Florida then, instead.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Call J. D. Vance-worth... 877-FASC-NOW.

[-] Binthinkin@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

Ah yes JD Vance aka Donald Trumps cock holster.

[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

Up front, I broadly support almost any aid short of NBC weapons to Ukraine. Territorial exchange by invasion needs to be non-negotiable, and Ukraine should be the one who decides if/when they’ve had enough war, not us or Russia

JD Vance is reprehensible and talking out of both sides, but there’s some truth to this idea. If you look back at the deeper history of Ukraine, the Donbas wasn’t a part of Ukraine under Kievan Russ or the precursor dynasty. The area is very ethnically Russian & Russophone (absolutely artificially boosted by prior pseudo-genicidal policy of Russification, as also in Poland) and if you look at the census data, the electoral history, and where the separatists draw recruits from, it’s very split east/south-east of the Dnipro river.

If the government in Kyiv (rightfully) refuses to give territory and end to the war, they are only left with Russian capitulation or a NK/SK style permanent standoff over their own DMZ. The survey data indicates the Ukranian people are willing to go all the way to Crimea, which is mirrored by Kyiv policy, but viable is that for Ukraine militarily? Frontline progress is steady but slow, and Ukraine shares a lot of the skewed age demographics with Russia that make a long term war difficult on manpower alone.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
259 points (93.0% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4184 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS