648

Satanists expose the GOP doublespeak on "free speech" and bigoted rhetoric (www.salon.com)

submitted 10 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 119 points 10 months ago

stop trying to "expose the hypocrisy of the right". that only works if your opponent is beholden to reality and has shame. that's not been what matters to them for over a decade now. you "expose their hypocrisy", and they'll just say "okay" and kill you anyway. they're openly, nakedly terroristic christian ethnonationalists. they believe any evil they commit is good because god is on their side. if this was a chess match, the right has already flipped the board over and pulled out a gun and the left is trying to argue that bishops aren't allowed to move vertically.

[-] Whoresradish@lemmy.world 79 points 10 months ago

Pointing out the hypocrisy is extremely useful for convincing open minded individuals who are listening to the arguement. Specifically the next generation.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 39 points 10 months ago

The Satanic Temple actually takes action to challenge laws, like when they commissioned a statue of Baphomet to be displayed at the Oklahoma state capitol after a monument of the 10 commandments was installed there. After a court case the monument was removed.

[-] HWK_290@lemmy.world 88 points 10 months ago

From their website

No, nor do we believe in the existence of Satan or the supernatural. The Satanic Temple believes that religion can, and should, be divorced from superstition. As such, we do not promote a belief in a personal Satan. To embrace the name Satan is to embrace rational inquiry removed from supernaturalism and archaic tradition-based superstitions. Satanists should actively work to hone critical thinking and exercise reasonable agnosticism in all things. Our beliefs must be malleable to the best current scientific understandings of the material world — never the reverse.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I met a boomer guy who really thought the Satanic Temple believed in Satan. He wouldn't even hear it.

He was also in a cult for half of his life. Like the "I live in a isolated bunker farm and gave up my passport/social security card" cult.

Not saying they're related. but I am leaning towards anyone who has a negative opinion of the Satanic Temple also being a fucking moron.

[-] KredeSeraf@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

I don't remember where, but I saw a debate over the validity of the Satanic Temple. And one uber religious guy said something like "well if you don't believe in an actual Satan who does?"

To which the other guys just deadpan dropped "Christians".

Still don't quite understand what the first guy was going for there.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

but I am leaning towards anyone who has a negative opinion of the Satanic Temple also being a fucking moron.

It's not that easy - I underwent the same kind of brainwashing when I was a kid (I grew up in Apartheid-South Africa) where everything from the peace-symbol to soccer to underwear that wasn't made from 100% cotton was hysterically painted as "satanic..." and I'm being quite literal.

It's difficult to undo all that - no matter how smart you happen to be.

[-] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

All hail jesus and his angel bahamut

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 87 points 10 months ago

I donated to The Satanic Temple last month and encourage others to do the same. Given that my donation was used exactly as I’d intended (highlighting hypocrisy), I’ll be turning on recurring donations when I get home.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

They genuinely do great work, I've always felt my donations are put to good use.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 60 points 10 months ago

Exposing the right's hypocrisy doesn't really do much. Many of them know but don't care. Many of them don't know but also don't care.

Sartre: https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7870768-never-believe-that-anti-semites-are-completely-unaware-of-the-absurdity

Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 22 points 10 months ago

Fool proof method for arguing with fascists: apply their logic to them.

They think their beliefs are universal. But the second you characterize them as the out-group of a violent in-group, they'll quickly qualify their statements. Be a rhetorical mirror to their misanthropic, suspicious, hateful worldview.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There was a book about authoritarian personalities I was reading a while ago that was fascinating and depressing. It had a study that showed right wing authoritarians are also willing to hunt down themselves

From this book https://theauthoritarians.org/

Suppose the federal government, some time in the future, passed a law outlawing various religious cults. Government officials then stated that the law would only be effective if it were vigorously enforced at the local level and appealed to everyone to aid in the fight against these cults.

[...]

Who can ’em be? Nearly everybody, it turns out. I started with a proposition to outlaw Communists and found authoritarian followers would be relatively likely to join that posse. Ditto for persecuting homosexuals, and ditto for religious cults, “radicals” and journalists the government did not like. So I tried to organize a posse that liberals would join, to go after the Ku Klux Klan. But high RWAs crowded out everyone else for that job too. Then I offered as targets the very right-wing Canadian Social Credit Party, the Confederation of Regions Party, and the mainstream Progressive Conservative Party of Canada. These were the parties of choice for most authoritarian followers at the time, yet high RWAs proved more willing to persecute even the movements they liked than did others.

Finally, just to take this to its ludicrous extreme, I asked for reactions to a “law to eliminate right-wing authoritarians.” (I told the subjects that right-wing authoritarians are people who are so submissive to authority, so aggressive in the name of authority, and so conventional that they may pose a threat to democratic rule.) RWA scale scores did not connect as solidly with joining this posse as they had in the other cases. Surely some of the high RWAs realized that if they supported this law, they were being the very pople whom the law would persecute, and the posse should therefore put itself in jail. But not all of them realized this, for authoritarian followers still favored, more than others did, a law to persecute themselves. You can almost hear the circuits clanking shut in their brains: “If the government says these people are dangerous, then they’ve got to be stopped.”

So I wouldn't bank on their self awareness

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

May I introduce you to The Alt-Right Playbook

TL;DR: they absolutely do not care.

There is only one party that cares about hypocrisy. And it ain't the conservatives.

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

The point isn't about getting them to stop, but to help more moderate people realize what they're doing.

[-] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago

As an anarchist, this is why I openly ask, who am I going to punch in the throat next?

[-] tygerprints@kbin.social 56 points 10 months ago

That Baphomet statue is so amazingly cool and so lovely - I don't see why anyone would have an issue with it. Religious freedom is protected in this country, no matter what religion or who is practicing it. Satan is also known as the bright Day Star, there is a freedom even greater within the teachings of Satanism than you'll find in any modern "christian" practice; all are welcome. Come in children, come in.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 10 months ago

I bought a Baphomet statue on Etsy because of that incident. Sadly, it doesn’t include the kids adoring Baphomet, buts it’s still cool as fuck on the top of my book case. Support an artist and let his loving gaze grace your home today!

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] farty@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Lol I was a Christian fundie when they first unveiled the statue. I found it genuinely terrifying

[-] tygerprints@kbin.social 24 points 10 months ago

I've seen many documentaries about this statue and from the first, I found it beautiful and engrossing. But then again, I've never been a christian - my family's pagan roots go back to the very beginning of time. And to honest, I sometimes find "christian" churches and cathedrals "terrifying" in their preservation of a dark-ages kind of sad reverence for spooky dieities and weird rituals. And paintings that are mystifying.

load more comments (13 replies)

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 47 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It has been 12 days since I last posted this image

[-] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago

Can you post it more frequently

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

(☞ﾟヮﾟ)☞ of course

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

It has been 12 days since I last posted this image

Thank you for your service!

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 38 points 10 months ago

This stunt used to work with the Bush-era (Jr. or Sr.) Republicans. They actually believed in the constitution, they didn't like thinking of themselves as hypocrites. They took pride in having a system of beliefs that was supported by logic. They believed in debates, and thought that their ideas would win.

The MAGA Republicans have clearly abandoned all of that. They don't care about logic. They don't care about the constitution. What matters is their fear. What matters is their interpretation of their religion. What matters is their strongman. It's a fascist movement.

Putting up a satan-inspired display only convinces them that they're right to be afraid, and that they truly are fighting against evil, and that they need their strongman to root out that evil. I still think it's important to push back, even if it only encourages the fascists. But, it's not helpful in the way it used to be when the other side was capable of being embarrassed by hypocrisy.

[-] Malek061@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

The bushes stoked fear as well. Remember when they went after the gays? Oh how about blacks getting free from prison? Willie Horton. That's all they know. Hit them as hard as you can with hypocrisy in their face over and over. Then they will learn when something similar happens to them.

[-] Seleni@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

But what it also does is force them to allow other religions into their ‘religion can do this-and-that’s bullshit, which they hate.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

The GOP is proud of it. Nobody's learned anything.

[-] HWK_290@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hence my donations to the satanic temple. Doing ~~the Lord's~~ Baphomet's work!

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

Hail Satan

[-] vitamin@infosec.pub 21 points 10 months ago

That's how it's always been with conservatives. Free speech for me, but not for thee. They've been used to suppressing and outright banning anything that doesn't tick their particular boxes for so long that they are in a constant state of rage that they aren't the arbiters of public decency anymore.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

Covid was the clear turning point for me.

Watching them protest.

Then beg for help at a hospital while on their death bed. If they survived, they'd only to then trash the hospital afterwards.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Even a toddler could manage to do that. They don't even try to hide it anymore.

[-] mdd@lemm.ee 19 points 10 months ago

The Satanic Temple does not worship Satan so how are they satanists?

[-] natedog526@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

The same way members of the Church of Satan are Satanists. What your probably thinking of is Devil Worship which is different. You can actually go to either of these organizations websites and they should be able to give you a good overview.

load more comments (17 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

The Satanic Temple really showing how stupid people really are.

[-] Zellith@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago

Satanists expose the GOP doublespeak on "free speech" and bigoted rhetoric

Well. It's Tuesday.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

ive been hailing satan since it became cool in the 1980s

load more comments

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023

648 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19138 readers

3326 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News