509
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

NATO’s newest member, Finland, has announced it will sign a bilateral defence cooperation agreement next week with the United States.

The deal will allow Washington to station troops and store weapons inside the Nordic country, which shares a sprawling border with Russia.

Finnish Foreign Minister Elina Valtonen told a news conference in Helsinki on Thursday that Defense Minister Antti Häkkänen will sign the so-called Defence Cooperation Agreement (DCA) on Monday.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 208 points 10 months ago

Special thanks to Vladimir Putin for making this possible, you fascist cunt.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 76 points 10 months ago
[-] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

How dare they defend themselves

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I can't even BELIEVE they crossed. THIS. LINE. And then touched me?! And still refuses to give me the combination?!

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 59 points 10 months ago

It should be noted that this agreement is completely separate from NATO.

[-] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 36 points 10 months ago

Technically yes, but in practice the goal is to make the practical arrangements implementing of Article 5 security quarantees possible. There is not much use of NATO support, if alliance forces can't operate in Finland in a practical way.

I am sure there are new operational agreements of similar nature will be made between Finland and Sweden as well as Finland and Estonia. That said, there is already a significant degree of defence cooperation between Finland and Sweden.

Finland is also already part of the british led JEF, and I would be surprised if the Nato framework would not change the nature of that cooperation.

[-] Siririus@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 10 months ago

Both Finland and Sweden are in Russia's crosshairs for joining NATO.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

I feel like they were in their crosshairs regardless.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

At this point it just feels like a layup on Putin lol

[-] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago

Yeah, almost like a massive web of mutual defense treaties..where have i heard that one before? oh BTW Russia, India, Brazil for some fucking reason, and some other asian countries have a mutual defense agreement.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

BRICS isn't going to happen Gretchen, stop trying to make BRICS happen.

[-] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago

I'm not going to pretend I know what BRICS is.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 38 points 10 months ago

I am very much against really almost any kind of warfare. That said, ahem, Suck It, Russia!!

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 32 points 10 months ago

The best defense against war is the ever-present threat of overwhelming retaliation.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

The best way to prevent war is to have extremely deadly force on display, with the implicit promise of punishment to anyone who attacks.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Remind lemmy next time someone is bitching about US defense spending.

Yes, we could do shitloads better, but the most expensive thing on planet Earth is a 2nd rate military.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Quite literally 189 countries manage fine with being second best or less.

[-] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

3rd. the worlds second best army is the US Navy

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

The most expensive thing on the planet is a second-rate military. Think on that.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Until a person is forced to grapple with violence aimed at them, they will shy away from recognizing deterrence as a reliable method. Until they’re forced to, they won’t choose to face the existence of those they can’t reason with.

I can’t think of any way around that.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago

They benefit from the nuclear standoff. Just like unarmed people in a room with a few armed guys. Nobody’s beating anyone else up in that room.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Uh huh. Middle East must be so peaceful in that case. Since everyone has guns everywhere. Glad to know that literally nothing violent is happening in the territories and Israel now. Same with school shootings in America. When I was a kid they were common, but when all the good guys with a gun got guns, school shootings vanished.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

We should give a whole bunch of nukes to them also Ukraine also Poland. Just like so many and with ways to deliver them. Then Biden should take selfies with the nukes in storage there and have them emailed to Putin while Biden eats an ice cream cone.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Poland yes and Ukraine as soon as there’s peace there. I don’t know how I feel deploying nukes into an already-active warzone.

Nukes make more sense to me when it’s quiet. Of course if you put a nuke in Ukraine, it’s sort of like defining the wall in Go. All the play has to now avoid that line. So maybe immediate nuclear deployment in Ukraine could work. I just don’t know. Haven’t thought it through.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 18 points 10 months ago

Astrologists proclaim the week of great geopolitical victories and news from Russia about how Finland should beware

[-] Droechai@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago
[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago

Propaganda tier

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Finland’s Nordic neighbour Sweden, on the brink of joining NATO, signed a similar deal last week.

NATO’s newest member, Finland, has announced it will sign a bilateral defence cooperation agreement next week with the United States.

The deal will allow Washington to station troops and store weapons inside the Nordic country, which shares a sprawling border with Russia.

Finland joined NATO in April after decades of military non-alignment, following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Under the deal, Finland will allow US soldiers access to 15 military areas and facilities covering the entire Nordic nation.

Last week, Finland’s close Nordic neighbour Sweden, which is on the brink of joining NATO, signed a comparable deal.


The original article contains 293 words, the summary contains 115 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Fuck it, let Ukraine join. Its at the point where we're complicit in all this. Why the fuck hasn't Interpol arrested his progeny for the time being and leverage the fuck out of them (in the most civil fashion)?

' Be a real goddamn shame if they were to be

  1. Stripped penniless + "personal assets" converted into numerically exact number of Rubble(s)— minus conversion feez and preferably smouldering and to be withheld indefinitely via escrow (maybe the Swiss can help with this...)

  2. If unarrestable/undetainable, Qatartined to a shitty wasteland like fucking USSR empire or some shitty desert hellhole where they'll be put in their place (only Russia altho we know there'll be boot-self-Sodomizers) 🙄

  3. Actually positive for the girlz if they have "Daddy" issues (like Daddy is implicating me to guilt by association a d maybe won't let me leave to live a seperate, peaceful life

  4. Bomb us, bomb yourself asshole

War over, a-check fucking a-MATE!!!!!!

!

Edit: Just cuz Russians are so "good" at Chess DOES NOT mean they are impervious to a bigger asshole fucking ripping the board off the table and beating them till death by anal impalement and symbolically safely neutralizing the much-implied+threatened explosive-potential by releasing all that vast worthless pent-up natural gas(ski) they sell and talk

Edit: I kinda like the sound of QATAREENA 🤣 Fuck them,🌵oo

[-] cbarrick@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Letting Ukraine join now would immediately trigger war between NATO and Russia. That could easily become nuclear.

In NATO, an attack on one is an attack on all. There's a good reason nations cannot join NATO with ongoing border disputes.

[-] Krukenberg@feddit.ch 2 points 10 months ago

There's a good reason nations cannot join NATO with ongoing border disputes.

Good thing Greece and Turkey are BFFs.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Honestly I suspect if those two go at it the Turks are getting balkanized.

[-] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Doubtful. Greece has been limping along economically for a decade and Turkey is a major player in drone warfare. Also, I don’t wish war on either of those countries.

[-] Krukenberg@feddit.ch 1 points 10 months ago

Maybe, it's still a major border dispute between Nato members where territorial integrity is violated repeatedly.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There's exceptions to every rule, including no exceptions. Russia is banking on US (both us and the United States) to facilely play by "the rules" and keep letting Hitler (noun) Hitler (verb)

~~That's on us, we should be so lucky to further box in Russia till they get alternative leadership with a new vision~~

They're not gonna bomb shit, that would take away any remaining leverage and is essentially akin to reifying Pascal's wager at the nation state level and the SOOOOO not rhetorical realm in which bullies like and specifically Russia so fluorish in unopposed. And he knows how far more terrifying the loss of control that would represent and gurantee for him.

We need to stop playing by Putinz/our rules and throw the fucking rulebook at him. Set a precedent that NATO will pull up its goddamn big girl panties and plug the fucking bloodshed regardless of the soverignty of whatever orifice from which it orginates

Everybody needs to stop appeasing and take control. He can't KGB or dirty-trix his way out of this, we have to realize we're an elephant on a leash spun of imaginary silk and we are very much violently allergic such substance

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

👆🏻 Sane take right here.

After this whole Ukrainian debacle, who thinks Russia has functional nuclear weapons? Remember when the US and the Soviet Union agreed to limited disarmament and inspected each other's ICBM silos? And the Russians had rusty rockets and silos full of water? LOL, once we captured a defected Mig, the vaunted air superiority fighter, they were running vacuum tubes.

There were hilarious videos at the beginning of the war. Russian soldiers joking and playing with their rusty AK-47s. Yes, 47s, not AK-74s or whatever variant is the latest, 47s. Twisted, bent main springs. Pins falling out. Rusted actions. Smack it a little, it'll feed.

Take a moment and imagine NATO warriors with such rifles. Really. Try to picture it. I have better shit in my safe. Last year they were fielding WWII tanks. Imagine what they're fighting with now.

FFS, Russia is begging artillery shells off North Korea. (And those shells are failing.) How hard up gotta be to bum ammo from your crackhead neighbor?!

"Yeah man, I got these shells man. This is some good shit! Swear to god man! They fly! They explode! C'mon man, I got these two cheeseburgers!"

Back to nukes. Someone will come along and say, "It takes ONE!" Now imagine the fallout (heh) from Russia letting ONE off the rails. Not like Putin has a literal red button. It will take a chain of orders and men willing to push that button. They will not do so. Putin may go completely mad, but his top brass is well aware that American boomers are on the prowl, and undetectable. Nothing defends the world's peace like an Ohio class submarine.

I grew up under the threat of Soviet nuclear annihilation. They are our enemies. They are on their heels. They started the biggest land war since WWII. Press the attack and call their bluff once and for all.

Or, pussyfoot around and whine about Russia's threats for another generation or three. Whatever.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I hate to drop The H-Bomb but the conjecture remains that Hitler would support this "course of [in]action". 🫡

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Should have already happened nearly a year ago.

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
509 points (99.2% liked)

World News

38955 readers
2077 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS