701
Oo rah (lemmy.world)
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lionel@endlesstalk.org 60 points 1 year ago

Is that a stupid question? Like aren’t most people negatively impacted

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 39 points 1 year ago

I imagine that they’re fishing for compliments regarding leadership training, job placement, etc.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

“I taught this guys wife how to fuck 10 guys.”

[-] zeekaran@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Should've said nine.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Well hopefully their social media PR person learned a valuable lesson- Don't ask a question on the internet unless you're really prepared for people to give you an answer you're not going to like.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Nope. Most people in the military aren't combat troops. A military the size of the one the US has requires a fuck ton of non-combat positions to function.

[-] jawa21@startrek.website 34 points 1 year ago

I think it was The Onion that made an article promoting a new Call of Duty game where all you do is fix humvees and wait on watch.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

So you get booted for smoking week?

I was friends with a military guy who used to hate the whole "thank you for your service" thing. He was like "I work in a fucking office in Dallas".

[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

"Thank you for your service" seems to be what people say when they claim to support servicemen/women and then try to defund the VA, Tricare, and post-service mental care.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

For most service members the Military is basically just a guaranteed job with a REALLY good on site gym membership

[-] DaCookeyMonsta@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Eh, military has a lot of jobs outside of combat situations, so idk if "most" ex-military are negatively impacted although I imagine anyone who's seen combat is.

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

I doubt most are negatively impacted overall. Though those who are, are often extremely negatively impacted (PTSD, serious permanent injury, death).

[-] ebits21@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

I see a lot of service members in my job… trust me a large percentage are negatively impacted..

[-] TheDeepState@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I’d think death would extremely negatively impact a person.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Wow - never seen just how, while tragic, low the death rate is.

https://dcas.dmdc.osd.mil/dcas/app/summaryData/deaths/byYearManner

So many self inflicted! And plenty of illness.

[-] Vampiric_Luma@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

What especially sticks out to my laymen self is the trend where active duty numbers decrease over time, but self-inflicted casualties continue to increase.

Additionally, the 2nd last page - from 2010 ~ 2019 the total deaths trend down from 1,485 to 893. Impressive! However, self-infliction continues to rise. :(

Thank you for sharing!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It is my (possibly flawed) understanding that because of improvement in personal armor, armored vehicles, etc. deaths in combat have in general dropped, but the psychological repercussions have not. So you still have plenty of people with severe PTSD that end up being part of that terrible 'self-inflicted' statistic.

Oh man that question backfired on them so hard

Military family. I've seen and experienced firsthand how hard the MIC fucks each and every member over.

It's nice seeing new generations realize it's bullshit

[-] wh0se@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Sorry, I'm not familiar with the acronym "MIC", what does it mean?

[-] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Military industrial complex. It's the system that keeps USA running. Aka the meat grinder. Feed young men and women to the beast, harvest their blood sweat and tears, reap more tax dollars every single year, interfere with foreign nations and profit from their suffering.

Interestingly, Eisenhower in his original draft of the speech called it the "military-industrial-congressional complex" but eventually scratched out "congressional". It would have been even more prescient had he left that in, not that it would have made any difference.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 47 points 1 year ago

from “Hetero, King of Incels”

a lot going on there

[-] BingoBangoBongo@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago

I mean it all kind of adds up.

[-] Kid_Thunder@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago

Don't forget about all those great VA benefits and after service care that Congress likes to cut until there's PR on them.

"Support the troops! Fuck the Veterans!"

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

@kingofincels

Wife

Yeah buddy...

[-] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Becoming an incel was another way serving affected him

[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Only 10 guys? Musta been an ugly lady. We heard stories about a Major's wife who was hitting triple digits.

"Now Jodie's got your girl -- that's right"

[-] bongo@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

I think someone wrote a little song about it. A jaunty rap f you will.

[-] AltheaHunter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago
[-] cryptiod137@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'd be kinda impressed, but then again it's not much different past the first 5

[-] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

gimmie that good 'ol marine corps spirit!

I've always found it weird that the Soviet Red Army also did the "oo rah" thing. It's even weirder that "gung ho" is Mandarin for "pull together" and started out as a slogan for the Chinese Communist Party before migrating to the Marine Corps via Evans Carlson in WWII.

[-] Cannacheques@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago
[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly I'm surprised how surprised most folks are by military spouse infidelity

It's an open secret they only got together for the housing benefits. At this point it's almost expected as the dues ya pay for ditching everyone else in the barracks.

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
701 points (97.7% liked)

People Twitter

5383 readers
860 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS