264
submitted 11 months ago by Stamau123@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

At the end of October, the Bundeswehr said it counted 181,383 soldiers in its ranks — that's still some distance from the target of 203,000 that the German military hopes to reach by 2025. This has given rise to concern in times of Russia's war against Ukraine, which has once again reminded Germans how quickly conflicts can erupt in Europe.

Since taking office at the beginning of 2023, Defense Minister Boris Pistorius has been thinking about ways to make the Bundeswehr more attractive as a career. He said he has received 65 concrete proposals from his ministry on recruitment and reforming training methods.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 11 months ago

From 1962, the GDR also introduced general compulsory military service for all men between the ages of 18 and 26 for a basic military service of 18 months. The only recognized reason for refusal was religious conviction.

So if you believed in a god who told you it was immoral to serve in the military you didn't have to, but if you believed it was immoral because you came to that conclusion by thinking critically about the arguments for and against military service, you were just fucked?

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 26 points 11 months ago

It's pretty much the same in the US. Religion is apparently more important than any other personal belief.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] chocolateo@lemmy.world 54 points 11 months ago

World War 3 is ramping up at a faster pace

[-] avater@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Si vis pacem para bellum

it's not that we want this but with dipshits like Russia at our borders there is no other way then ramping up those numbers and prepare for the worst.

Also it was very easy to opt out of it. I think I was one of the last who got drafted in 2007 and all of my friends avoided it by simply writing a letter and explaining that they have doubts using weapons.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

In a dire situation, I have serious doubts common would not volunteer or simply take up arms to defend those dear to them.

But we are not speaking about defending family, friends and home here: this is war preparation. And the overall general feeling is that war is undesirable.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

I’m not entirely opposed to compulsory service, but it shouldn’t be just military. Civil service should be included as well, anything from internship at a town planning and engineering service, to litter pickup, to the military. I could already guess that socioeconomic factors would favor the well-connected and wealthy the soft jobs of working in the governor’s office vs being sent out to pick up trash along the highways, but maybe a lottery system would help prevent that. There’s always ways to game a system, though. Unfortunately.

Mandatory service isn’t the best answer, it’s just one answer.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

All the alternatives you suggest don't accomplish what the military does - transforming a person into a non-thinking unconditional follower of orders.

I've seen time and time again when veterans come into the civilian working world. The boss tells them to impale their hand to the desk, and they'll ask which hand, what gauge nail, and what type of hammer. On the other hand, you put them in a situation that requires individual decision making, no matter how small, and they'll be entirely lost.

These are solely my experiences and probably don't apply to every man, woman, and child who has ever worn the uniform.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 38 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Fuck this, I can’t stand the idea that in the 21st century you can still have involuntary servitude.

My country recently reinstated mandatory military service. I mean obviously, how else can we get people to sign up. There is of course the idea of actually paying well and giving proper benefits to people who voluntarily sign up, but this is clearly lunacy.

And this is the single biggest reason I am emigrating from my country before my three male offspring are 18, unless this decision is repealed in the next 5 or so years.

[-] cikano@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago
[-] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago
[-] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I thought Latvia reinstated military service to ensure enough trained people to resist a possible Russian invasion. Is that correct? And, if so, is this not a worthy cause?

Genuine question, since I live far away and don't have to worry about being invaded by Russia.

[-] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

That is the goal of reinstating the sevice, yes, and many of my countrymen would see it as a worthy cause. Idea is that mandatory drafting will only happen if not enough volunteers apply but I also read that they intend every (male) citizen to have some participation in this before 27.

I firmly reject this notion, however. There is no cause worthy enough to forego a persons individual freedoms.

There are no official exemptions for freedom of thought or religion (although our constitution should in theory allow this). Dodging is a felony, being a felon is an exemption however.

The whole ordeal is completely ludicrous too. The compensation is 300 euros (600 for volunteers(?!)) a month, the duration is 11 months. Obviously only men get drafted, women are for some reason exempt (MOD states this matter of factly that currently it is enough to draft only men).

And after finishing this military service you are forever in military reserves, which has its own obligations such as mandatory periodic training.

There is however some murky “alternative service”, which technically does not involve direct military service. There are no concrete details here but generally it is thought that this will entail working in some MOD office type deal.

The reasons for the uncertainty is that the first draft was filled with volunteers.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Stamau123@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

Note: conscription is just one of the 65 proposals being thought over

[-] _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz 5 points 11 months ago

I would think it's "of the 65 proposals, at least one includes conscription as part of its plan".

Meaning, two things:

  1. I think the submitted proposals are likely multifaceted, and conscription is but one potential facet

  2. I bet more than one proposal also employs conscription

I wonder if any reports will ever be publicly published about these proposals.

[-] urfavlaura@lemmy.ml 30 points 11 months ago

they can eat my shit I'm not going to a war just because some dipshits told me to do so

and I'm also not going to join this "don't ask why just do it" hierachy

btw our former head of state advocated for the Iraq war so yeah fuck no

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] febra@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Isn’t it rich that all the fat boomers with their broken knees get to force young people to go fight their wars and protect their fortunes when in reality it is young people that are actually working and providing for their country and the over 25 million German pensioners and the rich living off of our taxes, subventions, and much more?

When I’ll be able to afford a home at a fair price and not worry about basic necessities even though I’ve been breaking my back studying for five years and actually working, then I’ll maybe think about fighting their wars and protecting their fortunes. Because as it stands now, I can’t afford shit, and I surely can’t afford to waste one year learning how to protect old fucks that have destroyed our economy. I don’t have anything to fight for. Maybe if I owned shit I would actually be interested in joining the military. As it stands now, they can go enlist themselves.

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I've read Machiavelli's The Discourses on Livy and he makes a potent point about republics: because people feel they have some investment in the government - and something to lose - they fight harder.

A key difference versus fighting members of a monarchy.

You make a fair point that the government and its economy aren't serving you well. The more people feel that way, the less effective a military may be.

People fight to keep things they care about. If the government isn't one, that's important.

Edits: spelling only

[-] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Yes! And in ancient Athens, citizens had to provide their own arms and armor. So, to fight as a hoplite in the phalanx, you had to be wealthy enough to afford the gear, which pretty much meant that you had to be a landowner. Poorer men would fight as skirmishers. So, the burden of defending the state was put directly on those who had the most to lose.

Outside of war, wealthy citizens were also expected to contribute the most towards public infrastructure projects. There was a strong link between wealth and privilege, but also between wealth and responsibility. It is exactly the opposite today, where the most wealthy pay almost zero income tax and would never fight in battle. And that is why people are losing faith in our system.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Isn’t it rich that all the fat boomers with their broken knees get to force young people to go fight their wars and protect their fortunes

Welcome to most every modern war ever.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HowRu68@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Germany and many other European countries which had abolished the compulsory military service years ago, are considering reintroducing it.

We had some decades of peace, but those times appear to be ending: EU should prepare for war by end of the decade

Add fyi: Is compulsory military service coming back in Europe

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 5 points 11 months ago

That will be a severe shot in the foot.

Professional, volunteer, military forces are a better solution. This only implies governments need to create conditions for people to want to join and the possibility to handle guns and use them against other human beings should be the bottom of an 100 items list, along patriotism and duty fulfilling towards national interest.

The last two plus an intriguing "character development" statement figured in a report for the reintroduction of mandatory military service in my country (Portugal), written by a civilian comitee, headed and divulged by a woman in her very early 30's. Severe public backlash followed, which was met by very thinly veiled proto fascist rethoric from the same spokesperson.

Mandatory military service is a de facto control and pressure tool over the population. Never again. Anywhere. Governments exist to serve the country and the people, not to make use of it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

How about we try making it less shitty first?

[-] Additional_Prune@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

La puta mili, as young men called it in Spain. Lots of hurry up and wait. Very little fun time driving tanks around. My father got drafted. I got lucky and didn't.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

It's been only 13 years since the last conscripts were called up. Crazy. I really thought it was over. It's probably not going to be brought back immediately, but the way things are heading...

[-] Copernican@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Can't conscription help build a more anti war sentiment? It's easy to send young people to war when it's the poor and the elites and middle class call the shots. But if the military has more equal class representation, maybe leaders in a democratic society would behave differently.

[-] tribut@infosec.pub 13 points 11 months ago

Except when you're privileged its easy to find some doctors to get you exempted. I've seen it with my own eyes. None of the boys with rich parents had to serve.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Just pay the dr to say you have bone spurs lol.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Since taking office at the beginning of 2023, Defense Minister Boris Pistorius has been thinking about ways to make the Bundeswehr more attractive as a career.

As journalist and defense and security policy expert Thomas Wiegold told DW: "A major frustration in the Bundeswehr is the bureaucracy.

When Pistorius floated his ideas about conscription in December, he faced a barrage of criticism, including from within his own center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD).

Party co-chair Saskia Esken said it would be impossible to implement mandatory recruitment on an ad hoc basis "because the training units required for this are no longer available."

"The reintroduction of compulsory service would be a serious encroachment on the freedom of young people who want to orient themselves professionally," FDP parliamentary group leader Christian Dürr warned in an interview with the Funke Mediengruppe.

"Who would have thought around two years ago that the Bundestag would decide on setting up a special fund of €100 billion for the Bundeswehr against the backdrop of a Russian war of aggression?"


The original article contains 900 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 81%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] febra@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Fuck them. They can go fight themselves their own shitty wars. I do not stand with the German government supporting and fueling all conflicts in the Middle East and Africa. If it ever comes to that, I'd rather break my own legs than take part in their neonazi filled summer camp.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 months ago

Die Trommeln des Krieges beginnen erneut zu schlagen

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] olizet@lemmy.works 3 points 11 months ago

Won't happen. We don't have the infrastructure. Or weapons. Or trainers.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Infrastructure can be developed, weapons can be built, trainers can be taught (or borrowed, probably). It's a speed bump, not a roadblock.

[-] Metz@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Germany has currently a 80 billion euro hole in its budget. It does not even has the money to pay for the existing situation.

[-] lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago

Even the extra budget (Sondervermögen) of 100 million € is not nearly enough to do this. Suren technically it is possible, but it would require so much money, that it is highly unlikely, that we would see the parliament in unison here. Currently the Bundeswehr cannot handle millions of conscriptions.

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I don't think infrastructure would be the limiting factor. Looks like Germany is 20k short of their target.

Denmark, for instance, still has compulsory service. However, it is only enacted if they have fewer volunteers than their target, and will only compel participation up to the limit. Denmark has not needed to compel anyone to join in quite a long time, fortunately.

That said, under a similar model, Germany would only need to add 20,000. Likely less per year depending on the commitment term. Eg 10k/year if they are conscripted for 2 years. Also assuming that volunteer attrition and signups offset each other.

the bigger issue is about the moral justification of forcing someone into military service in the 21st century.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
264 points (96.8% liked)

World News

39153 readers
2013 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS