86

I assumed I would boot up the app and there would be a big red button saying GAMES … but no. I have to sign up to PREMIUM. Then find the YOUR PREMIUM BENEFITS section. Then find EXPERIMENTAL FEATURES and select TRY EXPERIMENTAL FEATURES. Then find the TRY GAMES ON YOUTUBE part therein and tap on TRY IT OUT.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] elgordio@kbin.social 35 points 10 months ago

I wish premium would stop trying to add more stuff. I only want ad free videos, just do that, rather than adding loads of crap no one wants and then charging more because of the ‘increased value’.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

Just use an ad blocker then, I haven't seen an ad on YouTube in years. If they charged a reasonable amount for their ad-free experience (say, about what they earn from ads, so like $1-2/month), I'd pay. But $14/month is way too much, and I'd rather just not use YouTube than pay that.

[-] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I pay for premium so I can turn off my phone screen or do other things on my phone while listening to videos or music. Not having ads is a bonus. They would probably bug me if I had them. I've become indifferent to ads on most other things.

[-] bbuez@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I just use YouTube on Firefox on mobile, it does pause when you change apps but you can press play from the notification or lock screen, ublock origin also works here

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

I use NewPipe to do that.

[-] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 2 points 10 months ago

B-b-but think of the shareholders!

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 months ago

'but it's cheaper to get the home phone included' ^for the first 3months^

[-] wccrawford@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

I was already a premium subscriber to get rid of ads, and one day it asked me if I wanted to try this feature. I did, and I played (IIRC) an online version of Angry Birds 2 days in a row, and then promptly forgot about it and never looked back.

The games are pretty bad at the moment, and given Google's history with gaming (Stadia, I'm looking at your grave) I don't expect them to ever improve. And if they start to, I expect it to be shut down the week after, screwing over every dev that dared to hope they could monetize with that system.

[-] Hazzard@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, similar experience. The only game I tried was basically a web version of state.io, which was already a free app anyway, but instead I got to play a worse version in YT that made my phone burning hot. Cool.

I actually did enjoy it, so I just... downloaded the real app and never booted a game via YT again.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 17 points 10 months ago

First Netflix, now YouTube? Do people really want games in their video streaming apps? Can you even play while you watch a video?

[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 14 points 10 months ago

That was the funniest shit I've read this year!

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

That's the reaction I had, too

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Dom Diamond use to present the Gamesmaster TV show in the UK. He's been a games journalist since pre-8 bit days I think.

[-] firecat@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Finally, real newspapers just like the good old days.

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 months ago

I wouldn't pay for Youtube...

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 11 points 10 months ago

Tbh paying for YT was pretty good but the company kept making decisions that were worse and worse for creators, repeatedly failed to protect creators, and they raised the price so i cancelled it.

My current stance is that i will quit YouTube before i watch ads.
I'm open to being a paid member again but for the older, lower price and YT will need to be more on the side of creators. This will not happen, so 🤷‍♂️

[-] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I’m with you, fuck this price gouging. I don’t need this stuff/things anyway

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yup, ad free YouTube should be like $1-2/month, since that's what they earn from ads. Maybe $5/month at the top end. They should make a lower end tier where you get X views/month ad free and make keep the top one for heavy users.

But $14/month is ridiculous and just isn't happening. I don't watch YouTube nearly enough to warrant that, so I just use an ad blocker. If they shut me out, I'll just stop watching, it's not a big deal.

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Google has been dreadful for a long time and do not care. They only need creators so they can milk the content and take the lion share of the revenue.

YouTube are pushing more and more adverts so people are more likely to pay them. Straight up manipulation.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


This reminds me of Lunchables where tiny versions of food fight a losing battle against mountains of separating plastic so kids can make pizzas out of crackers and processed lumps of regret.

Anyway, I start with 8 Ball Billiards because it’s first on the list and I wonder what YouTube can possibly do to improve a game that has had a billion versions on every machine since the abacus.

Crazy Caves was like an old Nintendo Game & Watch affair where a goldminer fires pickaxes skyward to smash plummeting rocks.

Maybe they would appeal to a gamer so casual they don’t bother to get dressed or have a shower, and just lie there in pyjamas covered in beans from last night’s dinner.

YouTube appears to have ordered barely functioning developers to make supermarket own brand versions of games we got bored playing a decade or more ago.

They’re like knockoff toys from foreign market stalls, a Robert Downeyesque plastic face in a suit, branded Iron Guy.


The original article contains 945 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Annoyed_Crabby 3 points 10 months ago

The only game i tried is solitaire, the rest doesn't seem interesting at all.

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
86 points (88.4% liked)

Games

16679 readers
1085 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS