980
submitted 10 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago

What a useless article because I have no idea if he is right and this was political play, or if this is a case of leopards ate my face. I would love for it to be the latter, but I have no idea because it doesn't actually provide any information for me to make that determination.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Tbh it's not totally useless, as it notes the books have only been temporarily removed, and so the reality is that it's neither him being right about a political play nor leopards eating his face...Yet. I haven't found any followup articles on Escambia County Public School District's review of their books, and wouldn't expect to for awhile given they're reportedly reviewing over 1,600+ books for legal compliance. Also, it's kind of ironic that O'Reilly's benefiting from the group Freedom to Read tracking the books under review...

Right now O'Reilly's fuming over kind of nothing, as no decision has been made regarding whether to ban or remove any of the books up for review. They're simply all in-process of review to comply with the ridiculous new legislation. Maybe in that sense it's kind of more of a leopards ate my face situation that his books have even been temporarily pulled for review because of the legislation?

I don't really know what they were expecting though, as I'm guessing many school districts in Florida are having to go through similar processes to avoid running afoul of the law.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Rooter@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Rules for thee, not for me.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

The book was pulled for too many mentions of loofah.

[-] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 11 points 10 months ago

“I DID IT, LEO-PAAAAARD”

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago
[-] Remmock@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

More like MediaLite. What were the books? What official pulled them and on what grounds/passages? Who filed the initial motion/complaint and why? Does Bill plan to do anything more than whine?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Tide Comes In for the Fashits

[-] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Irony much?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Something something that quote about wanting to free the in group and bind the out group,

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

this aggression, it will not stand, dude

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Thumbnail looks like a depressing Wish version of Max Headroom.

[-] ULS@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"kill Bill O'Reilly" (not my words) "older" East Coast real hiphop for the youngins.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZ6d8w20-zY&t=1

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
980 points (97.7% liked)

News

23388 readers
1749 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS