298

This title seems a little click-baity, but the content within does add good perspective about what employees have known all along

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 69 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It was never really about productivity

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 32 points 10 months ago

Yep. It's about commercial real estate, and justifying the existence of middle management.

[-] JustUseMint@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

Don't forget extreme micromanagement

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Which always leads to better metrics/KPIs right lean leaders? Right?

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

And demand for oil.

[-] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 24 points 10 months ago

It was partly about finding an easy reason to let people go / coerce people to leave.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

All that money they invested in corporate real estate is probably a driving factor too., but IMO it's probably mostly about their own perceived power of people: Micromanaging the shit out of people is just easier and more gratifying to them in person.

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago

WFH is unambiguously the future no matter how much these hogs keep dragging their feet.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

From the employess perspective it is a huge prductivity and salary gain, that costs the company nothing. If you work 40 hours a week, but also spend 2 hours for your commute every day, you effectively spend 50 hours for work in a week.

So pulling the people back to office is factually a 25% work time increase and a 20% decrease on the hourly wage. Yet the company is only receiving the same 40 hours of work that can be productive for them. This has to fail in raising productivity.

I really hope that in 10 years people will look back at this and be flabbergasted by how painfully obious WFH is the better choice for everyone working in office jobs, and people could be so stupid today to pull them back into the office.

[-] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 14 points 10 months ago

No employers will offer me a private office which is what I have at home.

I’ve invested in my home office and my monitor, mouse, keyboard, webcam are all way way better than the ones in office.

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 10 months ago

Why is this monitor not working? Why is this keyboard sticky? Why is that guy so LOUD? I’m going home

[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Plot twist: you are home.

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

yeah i honestly think that's a big part of it -- now they can't goad people with bullshit perks like 'a slightly less shitty office' that enforce a hierarchy; lower level employees won't feel as bad when they're not being demeaned in various ways. and the #1 goal of a business other than making more money forever is to allow the sycophants and psychopaths it employs to feel power and control

[-] const_void@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Same here. The equipment they use in my office is the cheapest they can possibly find. 1080p monitors, plasticky garbage mice and keyboards.

[-] Waldowal@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I could have told you that in a 1-page report.

[-] MajorSauce@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

Anyone got a link to said report? I tried a couple of the links in the article, without avail.

this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
298 points (99.7% liked)

Work Reform

9856 readers
23 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS