116
submitted 8 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

The arson attack in a revered Kyoto animation studio killed 36 people and injured dozens more.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] frefi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 8 months ago

It's trippy for such a technologically advanced country that they still do hangings

[-] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 25 points 8 months ago

The Gundam Firing Squad is out for repairs, and they couldn't find a pen to write his name in the Death Note.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

This legitimately made me laugh

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 19 points 8 months ago

They are very conservative and toxic in many things sadly. It doesn't sit right with their international image. The country of contrasts I guess.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I don't condone the death penalty.

But....

...that fucker killed 36 people by setting a building on fire. Let's suppose that a few of them didn't die by smoke inhalation, but actually being burned alive. That fucker burned alive people. One of the most painful deaths one can experience.

I'd say hanging (and again I don't condone it!!!!) is getting out easy.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

But....

This is death penalty version of I'm not racist but

Considering how Japan's justices system is as bad as the US there definitely shouldn't be a death penalty in ANY circumstances

Plus, that's just letting them off easy. Life in prison is a worse sentence.

[-] Titou@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago

"Life in prison is a worse sentence" depend where

Anywhere that still uses the death penalty, I'm guessing.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Which is part of my point.

"Poor baby is getting hanged!"

Dude, that poor baby burned people alive. Don't give him any sympathy.

I wouldn't kill him because I believe killing someone is not right, not because it's cruel.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No, not really. Because if they asked me directly "hey, should we kill this motherfucker?" I'll say no. Even if I had supreme, absolute power. I'm the kind of guy who will catch scorpions in my house and release them in the wild.

I was just putting what the OP said into perspective: "how can ANYONE kill a poor person who burned alive innocent people in such a BARBARIC way that is by hanging?!"

[-] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

According to the autopsies most people died due to burns rather than smoke

Let the fucker hang, and that's the least we could do

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Ugh. Horrible.

[-] Djtecha@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago

Kinda sounds like you might be for the death penalty....

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Nope. I already said that what I'm disagreeing with is OP saying that death by hanging is oh so barbaric, when the perpetrator burned people alive. Those victims didn't have the chance of dying by hanging.

It's like saying that I don't agree with physical punishment for misbehaving kids. Let's suppose that a kid skins another kid alive, and the father spanks him as punishment. I'll say "nah, that's wrong. Take him to a psychiatric center instead." And if someone says "so barbaric that the kid got spanked instead of getting his ears pulled, which is more common," I'll say "bruh, that kid skinned someone alive!"

[-] Djtecha@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago

Yea, you sympathize and thus justify the secondary action. In this case that would be the death penalty.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Whatever you say, buddy. My abhorrence towards the death penalty is not up for discussion here, and I'm getting bored already.

Just rest assured that if you're ever on death row, and it's in my power to get you out of it, I will do it unconditionally.

Furthering this discussion is of no use to me. Have a nice evening.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

Im not sure its any worse than any method done today outside of inert gas asphyxiation, which ironically has gotten a lot of pushback. If death penalty is done they should allow a choice of options a state could reasonably accomodate with the most humane one they can figure out as the default.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Death by snu-snu.

[-] TTimo@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

I didn't think they still had the death penalty even.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Having seen and been moved by Violet Evergarden, which if I remember right was produced there, I have to say ... I think justice is served here.

The company is a rare bright spot in a very ugly and difficult industry.

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

I understand the sentiment... but murdering that many people is the bad thing. They don't need to be good guys for you to think their death was unjustified.

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

And continues to be.

After a few months break, those that were able to returned to work and went right back to cranking out amazing material and stories as if nothing had ever happened. No quality difference between the work done before the tragedy and the work done after. Bless all of them because they are clearly driven by a white-hot passion to create over anything else.

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 1 points 8 months ago

Out of the few kinds of crimes that I feel qualify for a Death Sentence...this is absolutely One Of Them.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

There should be an extra clause for death penalties that they should only be given out in cases beyond physical impossibility as opposed to reasonable doubt. Reasonable doubt is not a good bar for killing somebody, but in this case there's no physical possibility it wasn't him.

this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
116 points (99.2% liked)

News

23161 readers
3062 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS