182
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

White House calls for legislation after ‘alarming’ proliferation of Taylor Swift deepfakes — Social media networks also need to do more to prevent the spread of the images, said press secretary Kar...::The White House said sexually-explicit AI-generated images of pop star Taylor Swift were concerning and that Congress should consider legislation to address fake, abusive images that are proliferating online.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] the_q@lemmy.world 128 points 9 months ago

Now that it happened to a billionaire "something needs doing". This society we live in is shit.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 41 points 9 months ago

and you bet its going to be done in a way that fucks us over somehow

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

So many women have been calling for action to this, and they only listen when it's Taylor Swift who gets harmed

[-] Saxoboneless@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Nah plenty of rich people have been deepfaked, this is probably getting addressed because of her massive and obsessive fanbase.

[-] maness300@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Ahh, so things only get done when you can convince twitter idiots to get up in arms.

[-] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 70 points 9 months ago

Yeah, like people haven't been making fake sexual images of celebrities for decades...

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 36 points 9 months ago

to be fair the tools recently got orders of magnitude better

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Not better, just easier for the plebes to use.

There's a world of difference in effort and intelligence needed between photoshopping a particular person's head onto a body doing what you fantasize and just typing in "Taylor Swift sucking on a huge black cock while being fucked from behind" and having an AI art program just spit out the wanted result.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 12 points 9 months ago

No, actually better. Sure, there's been photoshopped images since forever, but Marilyn Monroe stripping for you while saying your name? Never been a thing...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 59 points 9 months ago

The shit this woman has to take is repulsive.

About twelve years ago I met her in Park City, where I lived at the time. I had no fucking clue who she was while we chatted on the lift line but she was very nice and was very excited to ski. I let her take the chair ahead of me and I got the next chair with a middle aged man (late forties+, so about ten years older than me at the time). He excitedly told me that she was Taylor Swift to which I replied something like "Oh, that's cool. I'm not a country fan". He kept yapping all the way up, taking pictures with his phone, etc. At the top he almost made me fall as he bolted from the chair. The poor woman got mobbed by a crowd that seem to.manifest out of thin air. I sat, strapped my foot in (snowboard), took my time, and the poor woman was still surrounded by crazies. She was so excited to ski. I know now she was about twenty but I thought she was ~15 because she was so giddy. I doubt she got to ride. I'm still grossed out by that scene all these years later and things have only gotten worse for her since.

I wish her the best.

[-] ignism@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

Snowboarders like you are such chill dudes. I never was much of a skater as a kid tho I did pick up snowboarding. Last week I strapped my board again, it’s been at least 9 years, was nervous about it as I am not as flexible as I used to (am 38 now) and this kid comes up and says: “Huck Knife! Nice board dude!” Made my day. Made me loose my anxiety and learned that I still knew how to ride.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] b3an@lemmy.world 55 points 9 months ago

Kinda annoying that this has been warned about repeatedly before, and yet only when someone famous has it happen to them that they go “oh ok maybe this is a problem.”

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago

The potential for massive amounts of election fuckery should have been what moved the government to action.

But at least something gave them a kick in the ass, so I suppose yay?

Still, I hope they consult actual subject matter experts, and don't just do a bunch of "common sense" sounding things that don't actually accomplish anything (or worse, cause a ton of collateral damage across all tech industries.)

[-] maness300@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Nations are fiefdoms.

It's not because she's famous, it's because she's rich.

[-] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

This is what bothers me so much about this, how many people have been affected by this and the only reason this is finally being treated with the seriousness it deserves is because a famous person is affected?

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

She's not just famous, she's a billionaire. The government will move mountains for her now.

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago

So many women have been calling out for this and it takes frickin Taylor Shift for them to call for a legislation...

[-] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 9 months ago

did you expect anything else?

[-] papertowels@lemmy.one 7 points 9 months ago

Precedence set by Ticketmaster too....

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

If I had a list of 1,000 things the White House ought to be doing right now, legislating Taylor Swift deepfakes would be 1,001.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

So for the past year there have been of deep fakes of thousands of minors floating around but it really becomes a problem when a mega famous billionaire is affected where it doesn’t really make much of a difference. Not to say it isn‘t about time. It absolutely is. Interesting priorities though.

[-] Doorbook@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

I think her fans are the one who made this a big issue for media attention.

[-] zoostation@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

It's entirely logical and definitional that what happens to a celebrity gets more attention than what happens to non celebrities. It could only be this way. You have fumbled whatever type of moral scolding this was supposed to be. Let's just accept the world is imperfect and celebrate that the issue will get more attention now.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

It's not a problem at all. It's an opportunity.

Just think! An entirely new class of merchandise: Make Taylor Swift the avatar of your AI assistant. Cam chat with the genuine Taylor Swift AI.

Or Taylor Swift Movies and cameos. Any nobody actor plays her part and Taylor's likeness is deep-faked onto her. Any show where they pretend that some fictional character is a famous singer. That can be the real Taylor. They can churn that out while the biological Taylor is out there, making money.

But for all the licensing money to roll in, you need to turn a human likeness into a property that can be bought and sold. Best if piracy can be turned into a federal crime in the process. That gives you way more power to snoop out file-sharers and the taxpayer has to foot the bill.

I mean cha-cha-cha-ching. You with me?

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Exactly. It's mind blowing the obsession a lot of them have with making pictures of an underage Greta Thunberg.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

I think the funniest part about all of this is that fake nudes have been around for years yet now that it's "AI" it needs dealt with.

[-] deezbutts@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

More like now that it's taytay it needs to be dealt with

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] db2@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

I feel like there are a lot more problems that have been going on a lot longer that should be dealt with.

[-] maness300@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

The fuck? Why is it a problem just because of taytay?

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago

That’s disgusting. There’s so many of them, though. Which ones are they talking about?

[-] Mad__vegan@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Love the sunny reference. Wish it didn't go over so many people's heads

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

This has been a thing for three years now. Are there still no laws?

[-] UnaSolaEstrellaLibre@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Only caring about this topic now when it happens to some filthy rich white woman huh

[-] 1371113@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Plenty of regular folks calling for this for decades and only once someone far enough up the money tree gets hurt do they do something. Frankly disgusting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Why did your previous post about this

( https://lemmy.world/post/11182958 )

get nuked?

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 months ago

Hasnt this been going on since Britney Spears edits in the 90s? Better late than never I suppose. Great governing.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 9 months ago

Things the world needs:

  • ~~governments regulating the Internet more~~
  • some others
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
182 points (86.7% liked)

Technology

59080 readers
1791 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS