136
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 121 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Seems weird to call it an "inert nuclear missile" when the entire payload component with the "nuclear" trait was not included.

For any TL;DR folks: it was just the rocket without the warhead. Basically an empty fuel tank with a nozzle.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago

"empty bag of gold"

[-] comrade19@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Inert nuclear missile aimed at america

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

FBI SLAMS LOCAL HOMEGROWN TERRORIST FOR TRYING TO KILL 1000'S OF CHILDREN IN FIREY NUCLEAR BLAZE

The next headline

[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago
[-] Zorque@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago
[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

While saluting a coffee cup.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

From Kenya... or, so I've heard, from a man who came up to me, he said, "sir," he said to me, tears streaming down his face, he said me, "sir..."

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 111 points 2 years ago

told BBC News on Friday that the device was "just basically a gas tank for rocket fuel". He called the event "not serious at all". "In fact, our bomb squad member asked me why we were releasing a news release on a rusted piece of metal," he said.

Saved you a click

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Peak journalism. Thats like a 50% made up story.

[-] Jode@midwest.social 49 points 2 years ago

I don't blame the museum for calling the bomb squad. The fuel they put in those things is some real nasty toxic shit that if there were any trace left would be problematic. The whole "nuclear" part is the media being intentionally clickbaity.

[-] brognak@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago

Love my scrap metal with a nice healthy layer of hydrazine.

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Isnt the whole point that the fuels self combust so exposing it to air should make it all decompose right?

[-] TheOtherThyme@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

This has to be one of the craziest weapons ever made. An unguided, nuclear, air-to-air rocket.

[-] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago

For when you've got really bad aim

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Well tbf, you don't need great aim when you can vaporize everything within several hundred meters.

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Sure, but no plane within about 2km is going to stay in the sky….

The em pulse, the shockwave, the heat….

Aim is for handguns, this thing might take yourself out if you’re not careful.

[-] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

The Davy Crockett Weapon System would like to have a word.

[-] Zellith@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago
[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

it is, but, like, artillery...

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Project Pluto has a few words as well. Well, mostly just the one word, but it screams it repeatedly.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Continuously to be technical, since it's a ramjet.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I was referring to the extra nukes it drops along the way, but yeah the nuclear ramjet also causes devastation all the way along the flight path

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I would guess that it was intended as an interceptor weapon. It wouldn't be used on one plane but a group Bears flying over the Arctic circle.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

TBF you don't really need to have good aim when using a nuke.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Tin foil hat engaged: This is exactly the news story I'd have the papers run if it'd had a warhead and too many people were aware of the missile's existence for convenient disappearances to be an option. Make it safe, spin a story to reassure the public, breathe a sigh of relief that it didn't turn out differently.

Then get back to guarding the secret prison facility holding the aliens who shot JFK.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

Surprising he still wants to donate it to the museum after they grassed him up.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What else is he gonna do with it? I doubt there's a ebay category for "nuclear warhead delivery systems". The best he might do is get someone to haul it away for scrap metal.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

North Korea may be interested in purchasing it

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

In all seriousness, they have much more capable rockets.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Keep it, or donate it somewhere else.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

He might have a new preferred method of delivery though. Think of it as an express shipping option with an unmistakable delivery notification.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

“Oh… is that what that is?”

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

"We'll shoot fireballs at it!"

[-] Mvlad88@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Ex Children of Atom member?

[-] proctonaut@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Wait until they find his sub.

[-] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
136 points (83.0% liked)

News

35986 readers
813 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS