I wonder if the libs will ever come around on this one. maybe 10 years from now.
I gotta wonder if discourse was as full of brainworms like this during the early days of past wars, like iraq, vietnam or korea
Vietnam War was incredibly popular until the release of the Pentagon papers
Like, that whole idea that there was a large anti-war movement from the beginning of it is just cope for everyone being rah-rah for almost a decade
This isn't correct. The Pentagon Papers came out in '71; there were tons of significant protests before then. Draft card burning dated back to '64, all sorts of SDS activity picked up in '65, Muhammad Ali dropped his "no Viet Cong ever called me n-----" line in '66, anti-war activism was a huge aspect of the '68 election (especially the Democratic National Convention), etc. This wasn't just a youth movement, either: half of Americans viewed the war as a mistake by July '67.
The causation probably ran the other way -- opposition to the war was so widespread by '71 that it reached people in positions high enough to leak meaningful documents.
I wonder if the libs will ever come around on this one. maybe 10 years from now.
I honestly doubt it. I believe that everyone involved in backing Ukraine against Russia is going to be doing some variation of the "stabbed in the back" narrative. Western governments, Ukrainian civilian leaders, Ukrainian military leaders, Ukrainian soldiers, Ukrainian citizens, absolutely everyone is going to be pointing fingers and trying to deflect blame.
Of course we all know the real reason Ukraine will lose the war is because Russia's military was just plain better. Superior numbers, doctrine, logistics. This war was Russia's to lose, and so far they haven't.
Using Race Science to analyze military doctrines. Incredible
(No idea how links are showing up now)
You click on the post title to goto the link.
Nevertheless
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --