21
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by 420blazeit69@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/russias-adaptation-advantage

(No idea how links are showing up now)

I wouldn't put much stock in the assertions of this article -- they seem steeped in anti-Russian brainworms and cite no sources or specifics -- but this is the shit you stay up on if you're a "serious" Foreign Policy Expert. And the take it's running with today is "Russia is actually better at this than Ukraine now."

all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TimeTravel_0@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago

I wonder if the libs will ever come around on this one. maybe 10 years from now.

I gotta wonder if discourse was as full of brainworms like this during the early days of past wars, like iraq, vietnam or korea

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

Vietnam War was incredibly popular until the release of the Pentagon papers

Like, that whole idea that there was a large anti-war movement from the beginning of it is just cope for everyone being rah-rah for almost a decade

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This isn't correct. The Pentagon Papers came out in '71; there were tons of significant protests before then. Draft card burning dated back to '64, all sorts of SDS activity picked up in '65, Muhammad Ali dropped his "no Viet Cong ever called me n-----" line in '66, anti-war activism was a huge aspect of the '68 election (especially the Democratic National Convention), etc. This wasn't just a youth movement, either: half of Americans viewed the war as a mistake by July '67.

The causation probably ran the other way -- opposition to the war was so widespread by '71 that it reached people in positions high enough to leak meaningful documents.

[-] someone@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

I wonder if the libs will ever come around on this one. maybe 10 years from now.

I honestly doubt it. I believe that everyone involved in backing Ukraine against Russia is going to be doing some variation of the "stabbed in the back" narrative. Western governments, Ukrainian civilian leaders, Ukrainian military leaders, Ukrainian soldiers, Ukrainian citizens, absolutely everyone is going to be pointing fingers and trying to deflect blame.

Of course we all know the real reason Ukraine will lose the war is because Russia's military was just plain better. Superior numbers, doctrine, logistics. This war was Russia's to lose, and so far they haven't.

[-] Aryuproudomenowdaddy@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

(No idea how links are showing up now)

You click on the post title to goto the link.

[-] SteamedHamberder@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Nevertheless

this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)

news

24512 readers
515 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS