150
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Seine-Port is introducing restrictions on phone use in streets, shops and parks – but young people say there’s little else to do

A picture of a smartphone with a red line through it serves as a warning in the window of a hairdresser’s shop in a French village that has voted to ban people scrolling on their phones in public. “Everyone is struggling with too much screen time,” said Ludivine, a cardiology nurse, as she had her hair cut into a bob, leaving her phone out of sight in her bag. “I voted in favour, this could be a solution.”

Seine-Port, in the Seine-et-Marne area south of Paris, with a population of fewer than 2,000 people, last weekend voted yes in a referendum to restrict smartphone use in public, banning adults and children from scrolling on their devices while walking down the street, while sitting with others on a park bench, while in shops, cafes or eating in restaurants and while parents wait for their children in front of the school gates. Those who might check their phone’s map when lost are instead being encouraged to ask for directions.

The village has also approved a charter for families on children’s use of screens: no screens of any kind in the morning, no screens in bedrooms, no screens before bed or during meals. If parents of teenagers sign a written agreement not to give their child a smartphone before the age of 15, the town hall will provide the child with an old-fashioned handset for calls only.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 74 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No smartphones in the street, or parks or shops, whatever, it's their town.

This, however-

The village has also approved a charter for families on children’s use of screens: no screens of any kind in the morning, no screens in bedrooms, no screens before bed or during meals.

is ludicrous.

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 52 points 9 months ago

No smartphones in the street, or parks or shops, whatever, it’s their town.

Screw that. A town shouldn't have the authority to take away basic freedoms like that, even if literally every citizen directly votes in favor of doing so.

load more comments (40 replies)
[-] 4c0cint3r3st@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago

In the modern world where internet is necessary for a lot of things, what better way to equip future generations for the world outside of their village than to almost force computer illiteracy on them by 'banning' all computers (along with the bad grades they're likely to get for IT in schools as a result of that, putting off some future employers), so forward thinking

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Steve@startrek.website 7 points 9 months ago

I got the impression that this part is a voluntary guidline

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It's all voluntary. I just think the last part is especially ludicrous.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

What a bunch of clowns. Nanny states never work.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 9 months ago

This is the most, small french town thing ever. There is never anything to do in these places so the younger generation always leave literally because there's no employment opportunities unless you want to become a baker, in which case there are 80 different bakeries in a town with a population of 400.

So the kids go elsewhere and leave behind all of the old folk with nothing to do except curtain twitch. And you end up with dumb pronouncements like this. Looking at your phone is functionally no different to reading a book or a newspaper.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

Is it an advertisement for Vision Pro?

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 8 points 9 months ago

Yeah let's go back to when kids had literally nothing to do and had to invent stuff. I'm sure that'll not cause any problems.

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Ah yes, kids outside playing with friends and using their creativity to come up with things to do. That was such a dangerous time and all of us who grew up before mobile devices were everywhere are all in jail because we did stupid shit. Not to mention how unhealthy if was to be running around, biking, blading, etc out in the sun.

Yep, let's reinforce kids never getting any sun and spending all of their time living through their phones or pads and never really experiencing life in the moment.

This isn't just about the kids anymore though. Even gray hairs who grew up before we had even the motorola brick are watching entire concerts through their phone.

I'm not saying that I agree with the "state" trying to set those kind of limits. That's up to parents or other guardians. I remember when having a TV in your room was a privilege now even toddlers have iphones/pads that they scream and cry without.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

Being bored has positive impact on kids, it stimulates creativity. Having screen has negative impact.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago
[-] sexy_peach@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago
[-] TK420@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I love saying it:

Get fucked people.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
150 points (95.7% liked)

News

23284 readers
1697 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS