Paying thousands of dollars for something that drops most of its value in just a few years can leave the buyer feeling cheated
How is that any different from non-synthetic diamond rings? lol
Paying thousands of dollars for something that drops most of its value in just a few years can leave the buyer feeling cheated
How is that any different from non-synthetic diamond rings? lol
This is 90% of things
other things have use-value, sentimental value doesn't depreciate, and they're overpriced anyway
there's no universe in which this is anything other than the whining of a (hopefully) dying industry
Interestingly diamonds are neat example of differences between value and price because they undoubtedly do have use value in real industry.
I think they're being used as tips in some industrial cutting machines because of their hardness
On a large scale actually and even for domestic individual usage, you can even buy diamond drills in your local tool store. They are also used in glass cutting, wire manufacture, abrasive materials, thermoconductive pastes and many elements of precise electronics and various (especially pressure) measuring tools.
There's a lack of blood of exploited minor miners for one.
Why are they talking about cars all of a sudden?
Coal is so bad, much worse than the natural way of obtaining useless rocks.
CW - image of colonial exploitation:
A South African miner getting x-rayed to ensure he didn't steal from De Beers diamond company. 1954
This image alone should be reply enough to these articles.
My lord Odin that's an excessive radiation exposure. Fuck De Beers
I remember someone posted an article a while back about this. The company cops would check workers' clothes, hair, mouths, butts, and balls for diamonds too. Imagine being so worried about profits that you hire penis inspectors to make sure miners can't keep a few itty bitty rocks.
Cartels usually skip this process and just make the workers be naked
you can still eat a diamond when you're naked
I expect diamonds to fall off entirely in the next decade or so. Their (natural, later artificial) scarcity and (manufactured) tradition was all they ever had.
(synthetic) Moissanite is cheaper and more sparkly anyway, if you're going for shiny
My wife's ring is moissanite, it was less than 1/10th the price of an equivalent carat diamond ring and you literally can't tell the difference. We both decided that we would rather spend that money on literally anything else. The mohs hardness is 9.5 for moissanite vs 10 for diamond which is practically the same, assuming you aren't using it as a beyblade vs a diamond ring.
Diamonds have a lot of practical value for jewelry because it's damn near impossible to damage them in everyday use, which can't be said for more brittle gemstones.
That said, synthetic diamonds will likely completely replace traditional ones except for people that want to reuse family heirlooms or something similar.
They have many industrial purposes.
Yes I'm aware of that, but we aren't talking about industrial diamonds
“Ackshully”
Gen z/ millennial getting yelled at solidarity 
diamonds dont even really look cool. i like those shiny mirror rocks that you buy for kids
I like stained glass that's kaleidoscopic in design. Infinitely cheaper and more humane.
all the other gemstones are too spicy
truly the
of the gem world...
I like how they chose "oblivious" rather than something like "unaware." I wonder what vocabulary they choose to use for generations that overlap better with their subscriber base.
Writing news articles like Victorian pen pals to impress my editor at Fortune Magazine
Unlike diamond simulants (imitations of diamond made of superficially similar non-diamond materials), synthetic diamonds are composed of the same material as naturally formed diamonds—pure carbon crystallized in an isotropic 3D form—and share identical chemical and physical properties.
Bro what. So “synthetic” diamonds are literally just diamonds. This whole time I thought it was just slapping a bunch of chemicals together to make some as durable as a diamond, but cannot be classified as a diamond because it’s some other chemical. Basically “I Can’t Believe It’s Not Diamonds” but no. It’s just diamonds.
Materials processed in a (capitalist) factory into a chemically distinct substance: "Natural flavors! 😊"
Materia made in a (communist) factory that is chemically and physically indistinguishable from naturally occurring examples: "Synthetic knockoff 🙁"
didn't you know? diamonds aren't real diamonds unless children have died mining for it
also funny thing is that diamonds are certified as synthetic if they are too pure upon inspection.
Remember folks, if you're ever shopping for a gem and someone asks you "what kind of diamond do you want?" It's completely possible and valid to answer "26th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union".
Well yeah you make a diamond by crushing the shit out of coal. The difference is whether it's done in a lab or underground.
"Nooooooo you can't realize that all diamonds are the same and we have a manufactured scarcity of them to keep prices sky high!!!"
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.