312
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

Upset over 'Curb Your Enthusiasm,' episode MTG vows to protect Georgia from 'nasty commies' who generated $4 billion for state last year

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 137 points 9 months ago

Just remember: if ever you think you aren't qualified to be in Congress, the bar is people like MTG, Boebert, and Santos.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 63 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Santos was a crazy person, but holy hell, he was hilarious! Part of me thinks he was a plant from all of the late night talk show hosts to provide material and boost ratings.

where did those babies come from?!

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 46 points 9 months ago

I really, really hate to say this, because it is itself a reflection of the ludicrous reality we're living in, but I would almost put Santos more in the category of "bizarre performance art" than any kind of serious political threat.

I'm saying I would not have a hard time believing that he doesn't really give a shit about the republican platform, or any political platform for that matter.

Even more succinctly, that asshole has been doing nothing more than auditioning for Dancing With The Stars this whole time.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

I could absolutely see a story breaking in a few years about how he was a paid actor from some political humor show. Like, they wanted to do a segment on just how far in life you could go in America by being a complete fraud.

The further it went, the more out of control it got until their character "George Santos" found himself in an election.

When the studio wanted to pull the plug, a few key players on the show convinced them to let it play out. It wasn't until he fucking won that everyone agreed that the charade was up, and they needed to do their civic duty and leak some of the fakeness to the press.

Incredibly, even after that it took nearly a year for the powers-that-be to step in and do their job, at which point, the showrunners were now a little too scared of the ramifications to own up to it, until the media frenzy had died down.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

Fast forward to 2025: George Santos was Sasha Baron Cohen in disguise this whole time filming his new movie Mr. Santos Goes To Washington!

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Entirely plausible

[-] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Santos was overqualified. I heard he had a Ph.D. and was working on a second.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 14 points 9 months ago

I also heard he was crucified, but then he got better.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Was that before or after he discovered the Higgs boson?

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago

Before, obviously. How else could he have started the Big Bang?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago

He was on The Big Bang? Oh, right. He played Sheldon. Did you know he wrote every episode?

[-] MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works 47 points 9 months ago

Streisand effect in 3...2...1...

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago

So right...I'll be sure and watch that episode now.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 46 points 9 months ago

Trust MTG to rail against one of the most popular TV comedy shows of all time.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

The things it doesn't understand drive the Lesser Sporkfoot into a state of rage and confusion.

It is oftentimes in a state of rage and confusion, so much so that many biologists consider those to actually be its default states of existence.

[-] gennygameshark@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago

I wish the media would stop reporting on MTG's various brain droppings. It's like, "We get it", ok? She's both irretrievably stupid and an unnecessary mean CUNext Tuesday, can we please move on?

[-] Owljfien@iusearchlinux.fyi 35 points 9 months ago

It's the internet just say the word cunt

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Inapplicable, she lacks the warmth and depth 🥁

[-] gennygameshark@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I know but I didn't feel like it

Hey eff you, buddy. People can say whatever they frickin want

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 29 points 9 months ago

it was a glaring reminder of why most Georgian’s resent Republicans in our state for inviting the nasty commies from California, the Hollywood elites, into our state by dishing out Hollywood tax credits.

I find it funny, yet not surprising, that MTG doesn't know how to use an apostrophe in the English language. Grammer is probably not her strong suit.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 months ago

It was a glaring reminder of why most Georgian’s resent Republican's in our state for inviting the nasty commie's from California, the Hollywood elite's, into our state by dishing out Hollywood tax credits.

There, fixed it. Yeah it's wrong, but at least it's consistently wrong now.

[-] NeedingvsGetting@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Thanks, I hate it

[-] clgoh@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

You forgot: ...tax credit's.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

You're right...

It wa's a glaring reminder of why mo'st Georgian's re'sent Republican's in our 'state for inviting the na'sty commie's from California, the Hollywood elite's, into our 'state by di'shing out Hollywood tax credit's.

Find and replace, it's the only way to be sure.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Grammar*

But your point is nonetheless well taken.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

She doesn't have a strong suit. She's a moron and a piece of shit waste of carbon.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

Curb Your Enthusiasm theme plays

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

MTG, once again, distracting her voters with stupid rage bate so they ignore what little she does for their wallets, roads, and homes.

[-] Skanky@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Can we, like, just stop posting about this shitstain of a human? She doesn't deserve any of this attention. Don't go away mad, MTG - just go away

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Thank you. The less we talk about this stupid individual, the quicker it will go away.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 16 points 9 months ago

The episode saw Larry David travel to Georgia, where he finds himself wanting to help an exhausted Georgia citizen who is in line to vote. So, he brings her water—and that’s when the cops show up. In Georgia, only election officials can give waiting voters food or water within 150 feet of polling sites.

David’s character ends up in jail, where he poses a la former President Donald Trump for his mugshot.

Greene didn’t find any of this funny. She tweeted that the episode “lied and painted GA conservatives and Trump supporters as racists and red necks and made fun of our good new law that stops the Stacey Abrams vote pandering machine and prevents voter fraud.”

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Why are we talking about Magic the Gathering?

[-] clgoh@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Is there a card to make her disappear, or something?

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Unfortunately she's like a walking stack of counterspells at this point.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 9 months ago

The thumbnail didn't load and I was reading the title of the post trying to figure out how the hell Magic the Gathering was going to protect anyone from commies and get so much money for Georgia. I was not in the right frame of mind for politics.

[-] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Hey, Sporkfoot...shup.

[-] IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

The state’s Deputy Secretary of State, Jordan Fuchs, told the New York Times that Curb Your Enthusiasm’s portrayal does not “not reflect bespoke reality here in ~~Georgia~~ my head.”

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago

This idiot again.

this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
312 points (94.6% liked)

politics

19135 readers
1502 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS