834
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Fine. It still tastes nasty.

[-] FormerlyChucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Nothing to see here move along

[-] Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Why is it so hard for a company to be like... oh shit, our bad, we won't use this! Nah. Gotta make the poisoning legal.

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

how sweet of them

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago

No matter what they say, i'll assume aspartamine is poison and refuse to eat anything that has it.

[-] Policeshootout@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I think the same thing about everything! Never believe anything that doesn't align with my personal beliefs no matter how much evidence exists to the contrary!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
834 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32316 readers
594 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS