280
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by wakumul@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xor@infosec.pub 132 points 9 months ago

oh look, he's calling on his supporters to attack a whole city because of a court ruling...
sounds like a dangerous criminal to me...

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 62 points 9 months ago

Just a preview of what he plans if he is president again. He will call for attacks on all cities where he lost a trial. Except this time he would use the military to attack

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago

When he was president he threatened to withhold federal funds from areas that didn't obey him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Time to prep for suing him for damages.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 117 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Do it, we shouldn't even be sending this much shit by long haul trucking anyway. Let's revive CONRAIL under USPS, deliver more goods by freight rail, and just use small and medium trucks for last mile deliveries. Oh, and demolish urban interstates. Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 29 points 9 months ago

In Switzerland, you cannot build any kind of major logistics facility without rail access.

In the US, local rail connection isn't even CONSIDERED when specifying logistics facilities. Even when they are being SHOWERED with tax and infrastructure subsidies to build economically-destructive machines.

The only developed nation to have mostly privately-owned rail and right-of-way. It makes sense when you remember easily half of the country actively wants all cities to fail and collapse.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

Tbf, the major freight carriers in the US blow ass to try and do business with. They're almost all being run like vulture capital operations, not trying to grow and flat-out ignoring cost centers.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

A big part of that, in my opinion, is because they own the track and right-of-way. It creates a VERY robust natural monopoly in a field that is already predisposed to natural monopoly.

In other countries, even deregulated ones, the state still owns the track and right of way. It an operator isn't doing a job, a competing operator can be given a license or pay the fee and use the track and just blow them up. The state can be responsible for maintenance of the infrastructure and safety features either directly, through a PPP, or by requiring the work be done by the licensed operators as part of their fee structure. But with essentially private ROW and track, you lose almost all power.

Shout out to the fuckwits in Cincinnati selling off their incredibly valuable resource for pennies on the dollar.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Oh, there's gotta be some kind of "collusion" or "racketeering" charge there.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 76 points 9 months ago

Economic blackmail against the largest city in the country will certainly have the desired effect.

[-] wakumul@lemm.ee 28 points 9 months ago

i don't even know what the desired effect is. you would think that they want the courts to be apolitical and not bow to outside pressure, and that's what sparked the protest, but now they are politicizing the court decision and trying to apply outside pressure.

there are lots of things this protest could effect, but the court's decision isn't one of them.

[-] danekrae@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

i don’t even know what the desired effect is

There is no such thing as bad publicity. Every other article is about that moron. Americans haven't learned one single thing about their own political system in the last 60 years.

People might claim that I'm wrong about that. But if I were wrong, there would be some sign of people starting to work together, no matter the party...

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Americans haven’t learned one single thing about their own political system in the last 60 years.

American proletariat doesn't have any direct control over their media. The rich fucks that do are, largely, sympathetic to Trump's message of a white nationalist state that pillages its neighbors for wealth and prestige.

This kind of media isn't due to Big Dumb Americans being too stupid to realize how it helps the Orange Man. It is entirely deliberate, both because it generates a based audience willing to throw money towards conservative causes and because it fuels the Trump campaign by making him look strong and liberals in big cities look weak.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

Ray says, “I’ve been on the radio talking to drivers for about the last hour… and I’ve talked to at least ten drivers… And they’re going to start refusing loads to New York City starting on Monday.”

“I don’t know how far across the country this is, or how many truckers are gonna start denying loads going to New York City,” Ray added, “but I’ll tell you what, you fuck around and find out, OK? We’re tired of you motherfucking leftists fucking with Trump.”

Ray went on to claim without evidence that 95 to 96 percent of truckers are for Trump and that the prosecution of Trump is “election interference.”

Why are we even reading about this? It's as reliable as your drunk uncle rambling at Thanksgiving. No, truck drivers aren't going to intentionally lose money. No, the Chicago Bears aren't going to make Uncle Ray the new Head Coach.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 72 points 9 months ago

Bunch of truckers about to lose their jobs.

[-] ApexHunter@lemmy.ml 28 points 9 months ago

Afterwards they will complain that they lost their jobs because they are being persecuted for their political beliefs.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 28 points 9 months ago

Thanks, Obama.

[-] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

They came here and took my jehb!

[-] notannpc@lemmy.world 53 points 9 months ago

Weird, if he didn’t commit fraud maybe he should fight it in court and provide evidence that no fraud was committed…

But I guess rallying his idiotic supporters into trying to economically harm people who he wants to elect him is a strategy. Because anyone with a functioning brain would see that any damage done by this trucker campaign would surely only be felt by the average American.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago

What a piece of human garbage.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago

cAnCeL CuLtUrE1!!!@

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 20 points 9 months ago

Just on time after the announcement of the building of 6 new ports on New York to reduce truck traffic in the city

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] StraySojourner@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Why does this thumbnail make me so irrationally mad?

[-] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

He looks like a little kid playing Tonka trucks, like a big one that the kid can pretend to drive.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Is he pushing one out or is one being pushed in right there? Hard to tell from his expression.

[-] glitch1985@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Maybe both.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

All 10 independent truckers, that didn't drive into the city anyway.

No.wait.stop.don't.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

There aren't even dozens of us!!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

I assume this will work out about as well as the convoy to the border did.

[-] Bobmighty@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

There are tons of truckers that already refuse to go into NY because they're afraid of the driving complication. No one will even notice this piss baby bullshit..

[-] young_broccoli@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

The "archive.org" link you used is triggering the site to make new backups of the article and it already reached the limit of captures per day so its not opening.

This is the link just for reading.

[-] wakumul@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

ya. i noticed, and i fixed it. idk if it has propagated yet tho. i fixed it p quick.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

More lost wages? Genius!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
280 points (95.2% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2042 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS