33
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Officer_Pickles@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Isn't this the moment to make a proper break from fossil fuel?

[-] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

No, we passed that 25 years ago without even acknowledging it

[-] Officer_Pickles@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Sadly I hadn't considered that. 😔. Still, isn't now an opportunity as well?

[-] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Yes absolutely, we can and should be mitigating and adapting to climate change as an urgent international priority.

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago

We'll end up fixing it one way or the other, and the sooner we start, the better. There is a lot money pumped into doom mongering to try slow progress as progress will lose certain rich parties a lot of money. But we just keep doing our best and looking for ways to do better. At the end of day, using less saves money and green energy is cheap energy. No one wants to live in poison.

[-] YungOnions@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

'The Government did not give any details about when or where the power stations would be built.'

This is the important bit. As frustrating as these 'commitments' are there's no guarantee they'll even happen.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago

...because it's courting the anti-green vote. Since the Ruislip result they think being anti-green will save them. Thing is, most people support being able to breathe clean air.

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Or it's an announcement: Fuck you, we are doing it anyway and we don't care about telling you where, when, how, much it cost, or who is profiting.

[-] YungOnions@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Maybe. Given this governments track record I only believe something is going to happen when it actually does, not when it's revealed, committed, unveiled, pledged or otherwise. We'll see I guess.

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Sure. I'm an American looking in from the outside and it just... seems like something Sunak would do given his track record.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago

He's also next to useless though. I'm sure he'll try and do it but whether he'll succeed is another question entirely.

When he comes up against a roadblock he often just gives up. I suppose is a benefit in some way

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Why are they still announcing plans? The ship is sinking and they're announcing plans to have a committee to discuss the rearranging of deck chairs.

They are about five steps back from been too late to implement anything.

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago

Money into soon to be stranded assets? Guess they pissed lots of other money up the wall....

this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
33 points (92.3% liked)

United Kingdom

4092 readers
78 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS