The gish gallop has gone mainstream.
What we needed, twenty to forty years ago at the bare minimum, were journalists who were willing to shut that shit down.
I remember being a child watching the news with my parents and seeing an oil company defender accusing the scientists of chasing profits.
Like what the fuck? How did that not end immediately with "And who is currently profiting?" is and always has been beyond me.
...I'm not sure that's a great example of the gish gallop. Technically.
My point was that we now report the untrue claims rather than saying, from the start, "This candidate said something completely false and not worth repeating."
For clicks, views, the algorithm, for profit. Nope. It was all to game the system in order to destroy it.
Sorry, this probably isn't coherent but I'm tired and tipsy, and I've chosen to hit save.
USPS has a way of combining smaller towns and suburbs to the largest nearby city. In practice this is very useful. You know your friend is near Nashville, say, and the zip codes do the heavy lifting.
So I would posit that using USPS as a source in this case is not a great idea.