Trans youth will no longer be prescribed puberty blockers, NHS England says (www.thepinknews.com)

submitted 8 months ago by LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

51 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 8 months ago

Go check the UnitedKingdom subreddit if you want to see the celebratory bloodlust of the average Briton, the blatant alternative truths and so on, and this is of the young progressive sort, the average 40+ boomeroid probably no longer bothers with that mask even.

I am so tired. I've fought the good fight for so long for my people but in the end it's like it was all pointless.

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 15 points 8 months ago

Go check the UnitedKingdom subreddit if you want to see the celebratory bloodlust of the average Briton

urgh, remind me to never follow that advise again. What a bunch of hateful, clueless assholes.

[-] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Are they real though, or bots? It's increasingly difficult to tell these days.

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

As much as I'd like to think they are all Ivans and Vlads from Kamchatka doing this for 50 kopecks, I feel like there can't be that many and with such authenticity, dedicated so hard to that sub.

Like how important is demoralising the already inactive disengaged progresvives really to political power and who has so much time and resources?

[-] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

The one thing AI LLMs seem to be actually quite good at is generating lots of quite 'real'/'genuine' sounding comments and replies, so it really could be bots. It probably doesn't actually take that much effort either in relative terms, if you decide you want to AstroTurf an online space.

It's a shame because it could basically kill discussion on the internet as we know it. It's mad to think it, but in a few years we could be telling younger generations of a time when we wrote words to each other online and it was reasonable to assume that we were talking to a real person...

[-] STOMPYI@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As MLK stated "The moral arc of the universe is long but bends towards justice " stay fighting for good!

[-] iain@feddit.nl 7 points 8 months ago

An arc so long it looks flat I guess...

[-] STOMPYI@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

That's a perspective... zoom out.

[-] thehatfox@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

There’s been a noticeable shift on r/UnitedKingdom since around the time of the Reddit protests. I no longer participate there but I’ve seen quite a bit of extra unpleasantness the few times of taken a curious look at it.

Not that it was ever a great place to discuss trans issues, but the nastiness seems to be spreading to all manner of topics now.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There may have been an organized effort by the far right to take over various national subreddits. It gives the impression that their views are overwhelmingly popular in the country, when really they're not. The subreddit /r/Canada also got dominated by the far right, which led to the creation of /r/onguardforthee. At least one of the mods of /r/Canada was shown to be an active neo-Nazi, and another declared himself a white supremacist. There is still too much support for the far right in Canada (and we're looking at a big lurch to the right in the next election), but it's not as dominant as you'd think from that subreddit.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Tbf, leftists did this also. r/northernireland had a big bunch of American IRA larpers who never set foot in the country, and edgy youth from the Republic.

[-] DoctorSpocktopus@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago

r/Canada is very similar

[-] DrCake@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

There’s always been that undercurrent of hate. The first few comments on any immigration story was enough to see that.

But yeah, I think the demographic did shift a bit in the last year or so

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 8 months ago

Haven't they always been like that?

r/GreenAndPleasant split off from them for a reason

[-] TotallyNotSpez@lemm.ee 31 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

A big FUCK YOU to all Tories, Terfs and similar asshats.

Edit: I'll donate money to Gender GP even harder from now on.

[-] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

All 83 of them?

Really that is the total for the entire country. Ya, it's a "serious" problem. .... Sure

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago

I think they were hoping to make more

[-] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

I'm not particularly well educated on the subject but according to the BBC:

Fewer than 100 young people in England are currently prescribed puberty blockers by the NHS. They will all able to continue their treatment.

So why such a big fuss?

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 17 points 8 months ago

Blocks any future access to trans kids

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Can puberty blocking be reversed at a later date?

Or can blocked puberty be reverted later?

I could agree with a ban whole heatedly if blocking can't be reversed and blocked cannot be reverted, but I would likely to oppose a ban it if blocking can be reversed and blocked could be reverted.

Gets a little fuzzy if it's one or the other though.

Wouldn't want someone to miss their only chance to block puberty, but also wouldn't want someone to make a permanent choice at 13-14 which can't be reversed if they want to later on.

[-] ondoyant@beehaw.org 11 points 8 months ago

puberty blockers are used explicitly to delay having to go through puberty. they are used for kids who have precocious puberty (puberty that starts too early), as well as for trans kids. there are some marginal risks associated with them, you might grow a bit shorter, or just generally develop differently that you might have if you had allowed puberty to progress on time, but there aren't specific health challenges people who use them face. the reason you take them is to explicitly prevent somebody from going through irreversible changes they might not like before they can make an informed decision, or before it is healthy for those changes to occur.

interestingly, most of the poor health outcomes of precocious puberty are psychological and social, not physical, which is, i think, an interesting parallel to the trans experience.

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 7 points 8 months ago

You just stop taking them, and your body will start going through puberty. Like the other response said, they're used for cis children as well when they start too early for their body to be able to handle. As with any medicine there can be side effects.

[-] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

When you stop taking them you go through puberty like normal. The idea is to protect trans kids from the irreversible effects of going through the wrong puberty, but not cause any irreversible effects if they're one of the <1% that later turns out to not be trans.

[-] Gamoc@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

You can't get any trans care that isn't reversible until you're an adult who can legally consent to it. Puberty blockers are reversible, you just stop taking them and go through puberty. This change is completely anti-scientific and pro-bigotry. It's indefensible.

[-] Lmaydev@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago

When you stop taking them puberty continues as normal.

We've been using them for a long time on people who start puberty too early. And know they are effective and safe.

[-] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

Glyndŵr, os ydych wedi gorffen cael te yn y bryniau hynny, gallem ddefnyddio llaw.

[-] Wanderer@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Scientist have collected all the data and decided the experts on Lemmy are wrong.

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago

Complete miss characterisation. It is lack of data the NHS is arguing with. Not scientific evidence.

The article is bluntly stating that the NHS has made this choice because no evidence of the long term safty exists. Not because scientists say it is unsafe.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024

97 points (90.8% liked)

United Kingdom

4110 readers

249 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net