192
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] companero@hexbear.net 103 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

While SpaceX’s reusable rockets have slashed satellite launch costs to US$3,000/kg, some scientists have estimated that an electromagnetic space launch system could drive those costs down to a mere US$60/kg.

China completely invalidating SpaceX's business model would be hilarious. some-controversy

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 82 points 2 years ago

NASA is banned from working with China, so it would be genuinely hilarious if they were the only group stuck paying $3k per kg.

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 50 points 2 years ago

I’m not sure what’s funnier. If China open sources the technology and NASA would have no choice but to switch to it, or they keep it proprietary and force the US to use spacex

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 49 points 2 years ago

The funniest outcome is this: They go open source, Elon takes the concept and tries to pretend he invented the tech himself. People call him out for it, but he doubles down claiming he's never even heard of china. It gets built and explodes because he cut corners and did dumb shit. Elon immediately blames faulty Chinese tech. lathe-of-heaven

[-] AbbysMuscles@hexbear.net 31 points 2 years ago

And retroactively blames those shifty [slurs] for stealing American tech that previously was just a series of doodles on a napkin

[-] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Elon tries to build a space trebuchet to compete, the release mechanism gets a bug and slams a $50,000,000 rocket directly into the ground. Blames China and Chelsea Manning.

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 28 points 2 years ago

I think the funniest outcome would be Elon being forced to try to build a space gun to try to compete.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 69 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

the answer to every infrastructure problem is high-speed rail

I hope they figure out how to do this with engineless commercial airliners (I know it'll never happen but it would be cool)

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 58 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 52 points 2 years ago

Fuck it, I see no reason why a train couldn't be shot between two tracks 100 miles apart

[-] JuryNullification@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago

I want to see this as a Dahir Insaat animation

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Well, you could make a "train" to orbit but your rail would have to be hundreds of kilometers long, dozens of kilometers tall, held up with wires and particle accelerators, and the train would probably just be a single car

Btw this would just accelerate the space plane so it doesnt have to burn as much fuel as otherwise. It's not a literal train into space

[-] HiImThomasPynchon@hexbear.net 46 points 2 years ago

It's not a literal train into space

kitty-cri

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 24 points 2 years ago

Don't listen to them, comrade Xi will make Honkai Star Rail real.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] flan@hexbear.net 43 points 2 years ago

i hope this works and doesn't turn humans into mashed potatoes

[-] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 56 points 2 years ago

they could test it on billionaires

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 28 points 2 years ago

It's probably not for humans

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ProfessorAdonisCnut@hexbear.net 41 points 2 years ago

CPC Priorities

geordi-no Mass Line

geordi-yes Mass Driver

[-] ComradeSpahija@lemmygrad.ml 40 points 2 years ago

...but gommunsiim no innovation!!1!11!111!!

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] M68040@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago
[-] invo_rt@hexbear.net 35 points 2 years ago
[-] Owl@hexbear.net 42 points 2 years ago

I couldn't find the cost of this project specifically, but China's total space budget is $12 billion a year.

[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Pittance we sent that much to Israel this year

Must be nice to have a good government

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] culpritus@hexbear.net 35 points 2 years ago

China is building High Speed Rail To Space!!! curry-space

[-] D61@hexbear.net 31 points 2 years ago

Which Final Fantasy game am I about to be living in?

[-] grendahlgrendahlgen@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago

VIII for sure. The cool futuristic society in that one launched stuff to space with a railgun.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zrc@hexbear.net 29 points 2 years ago

incredible things are happening in China

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 29 points 2 years ago

This is some raiden-source tier shit (approving)

[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 26 points 2 years ago

This sounds so sick

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago

Yup you can tell this is a railroad to space cause the reporting is just as awful as all the reporting on Chinese trains

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thirtymilliondeadfish@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago
[-] Parzivus@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I wonder how they plan to handle the heat generated? Maybe you don't need the same kind of acceleration for a rail launcher than with a rail gun.

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago

If they used the same acceleration as a rail gun they'd only be sending bodies to space, not people.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] plinky@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago

It’s not for people or it would be too long (?)

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago

The article says that the railgun part accelerates the plane to mach 1.7 and then the rocket on the plane fires and it accelerates further.

The Concorde was designed to cruise at mach 2, so that's a very survivable speed if the acceleration on the rail isn't too abrupt, like you said.

[-] appel@whiskers.bim.boats 28 points 2 years ago

I think the acceleration is the crucial part, the speed you are going at is irrelevant, just the change in speed

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] plinky@hexbear.net 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It’s still would be like 1-2 km, if they aim at 10g. And they still need to find another 20 machs from rocket booster.

Doing full railgun with small rockets is more poggers (without humans obv ) shrug-outta-hecks

[-] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 27 points 2 years ago

Tests will be carried out at 1.2 mile long low-vacuum track high-speed maglev test facility in Datong, generally used when researching magnetic levitation train technology

Within coming years, the Datong test facility will be extended to 37.2 miles long, to achieve a maximum operating speed of a staggering 5,000km/h.

biiiiig track incoming

from daily mail

[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago

That would still be a rough ride for a person, but it could absolutely revolutionize getting construction materials into orbit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HelltakerHomosexual@hexbear.net 20 points 2 years ago

There is no space race lol china is the only one actually doing anything

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
192 points (100.0% liked)

news

24519 readers
682 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS