256
submitted 8 months ago by Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The city has just 39 licensed cab drivers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 52 points 8 months ago

The shitty gig companies decimated the taxi industry, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see things like drunk driving tick up, especially come winter.

I hope the city can incentivize something new to fill the void. And hopefully they can also put guardrails around it so drivers and passengers don’t get screwed.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 80 points 8 months ago

The industry got decimated due to being worse than the apps. The apps 100% exploit drivers, but let's not act like calling a cab was such a good experience 20 years ago.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 55 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

100%

American cabs fucked passengers. Gig companies fucked drivers.

I recently said “fuck it, I’ll take a cab from the airport cab pool.” It was like immediately time traveling to a differently shitty moment in history. The cab smelled like it was made out of Newport filters and ass, and when we got to my home, the guy refused to take a credit or debit card.

Dude was picking up people from the international terminal, where they were often landing without local currency, then he would tack on a trip to the bank, with the meter running.

He had Master and Visa card stickers on his car.

[-] DoctorRoxxo@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

That’s when you refuse to pay, not your fault their card reader is “broke” and they didn’t inform you when you got in. They can get fucked, they tried pulling this shit on me before. I straight refused to pay cash.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

Yeah, that’s what I did. I said, you can take me to the bank for free, or I can not pay you.

After arguing with me he then relented and one of these magically appeared.

[-] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Man I have not seen one of those credit card carbon copy machines in a long time! It’s funny current credit cards will not work on them since they don’t have any raised numbers

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Haha yeah. My CC doesn’t even have numbers on the card. They’re in an app so they can be quickly swapped out if the card is compromised.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Yeah, fuck taxis to hell and back. I know Uber and Lyft suck for the drivers but I try to help out by being polite and leaving a good tip.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The apps weren't profitable. They sold rides for less than it cost them, which killed the industry. That's what all disruptive companies do, sell for an unprofitable price and have investor money make up the difference.

Taxi companies could not compete. How could they? It didn't matter if they were good or bad. There was no chance to compete because they all went out of business.

Again, the apps didn't win because they were better, it's because they didn't allow competition. In a sane world they would have had to have made a profit, and the taxi companies would have made their own app, and things would be pretty much equal across the board. But that never happened.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Again, the apps didn’t win because they were better, it’s because they didn’t allow competition.

I rarely ever took cabs or other such transport because they're universally dodgy as fuck. Apps made it convenient and accountable, thus succeeded.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Honestly, it was both, plus a third thing.

  • Uber/Lyft pay like shit and run at a loss.

  • Cabs almost universally sucked. Nobody wanted to use one outside of somewhere like NYC; and only then because parking sucked so hard driving yourself is an even shittier option than the shitty cabs.

  • In places like NYC, the government over regulated cabs so hard the medallions cost into the 6 and 7 digits of dollars. Out-competing that simply involved....not paying 7-digit sums of cash just for the ability to work as a cabbie...

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I still don't understand how Uber and Lyft can be so expensive to run.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Exactly. If you’re in NYC or SF, fine, just hail one. If you’re anywhere else you’re gonna wait 1.5 hours.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

What do you mean? You can just call their dispatch line and talk to an incredibly rude person over the shittiest phone connection imaginable then try to describe your location and hope that they heard what you said correctly from their mumbled response and hope they might show up and then charge you an unknown amount that you didn't know until you reach your destination while having no idea if they accept card or will demand a tip.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

The taxi industry let themselves get decimated because they fucking sucked and refused to improve their services. Not defending uber or Lyft, but taxis really fucking sucked and they got decimated because people were more than happy to ditch them for something better.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 8 months ago

The whole gig economy needs to be stamped out. In a capitalist society the role of government should be to protect people from corporations and they're not doing it.

It's such an obvious scam as well. "Oh it's not down to us what our contractors pay their employees!" as if they don't know exactly how much it takes for them to hire people to do it at minimum wage and then paying somebody else substantially less.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 40 points 8 months ago

"we don't want to pay min wage" -billionaire run companies who cannot pay people competitively with taxi services 10 years ago.

[-] jennwiththesea@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Minneapolis should make public transit free for a few* months, to encourage folks to use that instead. Golden opportunity.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago
[-] LeafOnTheWind@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

For the areas it covers, Minneapolis has a pretty good public transit.

[-] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

its pretty cool you can go from home to work to the store and back home without ever going outside. lifesaver in some of the harsh cold winters

[-] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 8 months ago

And at least Lyft is sending emails to customers making it sound like paying a decent wage makes their business model unsustainable.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 22 points 8 months ago

Which is weird because what's their overhead? They run an app. 99% should be going to drivers.

[-] fitgse@sh.itjust.works 19 points 8 months ago

They have to pay hundreds of millions a year bribing politicians across the world!

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] iopq@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

It is already unsustainable, they are losing money

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 33 points 8 months ago

We support a minimum earning standard for drivers

Is that why they spent millions to defeat a law in CA that would have clarified that their employees are in fact employees and should be covered by minimum wage laws?

I have to wonder how hard it would be to build some kind of open source platform to compete with these companies. Then the drivers will be free to set their own rates and this rent-seeking behavior can be undermined.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I have to wonder how hard it would be to build some kind of open source platform to compete with these companies.

I'd have to imagine that the answer to that is "really damn hard". Look at any Lemmy instance and see how hard it is just to create and maintain an open source "comment section for the internet" platform; now imagine managing thousands of financial transactions on that platform, processing background checks, establishing some sort of trust and security team, and people's livelihoods depending on that all working reliably all the time.

There's a reason why only VC-backed companies have managed to get off the ground in this space; it's hella expensive for a bunch of volunteers to manage.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I've always thought that a smart contract system on a blockchain like Ethereum could make for a really good ride share app that's focused on the drivers running their own independent business.

It would solve the payments problem. It could also automate the requesting and accepting a ride.

The drivers could post their own rates

The contract could take a small fee out of the ride fare to help fund the devs.

And with the latest Ethereum upgrade this week, you could transact for pennies.

I'm still not sure how decentralized trust would work though, and how you'd get licensed.

Real time map updates might be a problem too, but maybe the driver app and rider app could find each other and open a websocket and stream GPS locations peer to peer instead of via any centralized server? This part might be more janky at first vs a central service.

Edit: and the service could run on a stable coin so people aren't subject to volatility

Edit: just thinking on the GPS... if the driver publicly posts a web socket/api address you can connect to peer to peer, what if it only accepts connections by the current active ride. So the riders wallet signs the app request to open the socket and then the two parties can start sharing their location? That way it only gets shared to the appropriate people. But if a driver wants to know where before accepting, the rider would need to publicly post the where, so maybe you only post to 2mile radius or something, and the actual address gets done peer to peer if accepted?

Edit: also the contracts are open source, it's the front ends that would be the developers business, and technically anyone could copy the smart contracts and write their own front end to them, and if it took off, I imagine people would eventually write an open source front end as well. It'd help keep costs down as if you were too uncompetitive someone else could enter.

Edit: and if it was just an open source front end, no city would be able to stop it. It'd be forever accessible where someone could post they are available to pick up, and anyone could post they need a ride. Trust wouldn't even need to be solved by this specifically, trust is a problem other people/business can solve and it just hooks into this.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 3 points 8 months ago

You're identifying all the reasons why a team of volunteers haven't been able to manage such a feat yet.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Hahaha you're right, it's still not simple, it just makes the payments and connecting two people easier. The rest is still a lot of work and there are many unclear solutions to some problems.

It does remove all the need for centralized nfrastructure like AWS though which would lower costs

I think something like this though could be the solution to the gig work people getting the shaft. It'd give the power back to them.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

That's why emails come from a no-reply address. You need the media to draw attention to the bullshit. Good luck with that.

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

Fuck Lyft. I stopped using them after I dropped my phone in a ride and it took the idiot customer service agent FORTY FIVE MINUTES to reach out to the driver. They kept asking me to login to my account to verify it was me, but I couldn't because it kept sending the 2FA code to my phone... Which I didn't have. The agent wasn't able to comprehend this.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Bye, Felicia!

[-] EvilLootbox@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

What about Uber Eats and Doordash and the others? Do they have to comply with the new minimum wage or shut down too? Hoping they can make a decent wage.

Uber was forbidden from setting up where I live but Uber Eats is a thing here.

[-] STOMPYI@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Good riddance.

[-] Russianranger@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I guess there is going to be a split on this in terms of what people think. Obviously ride share drivers would love this, and since the only time I’m in Minneapolis is when I’m on business, it’s my company footing the bill, not me.

However - if it was me footing the bill, I’m sure I’d be much less inclined to take a Lyft/Uber. However, ending ops over this is stupid, because there will be people that will pay for it, business or personal. Let the market decide what’s palatable.

Everyone’s wallet is shrinking due to the rampant inflation over the past several years, and if you’re a full time ride share driver, it’s hard to cut even with the rising costs all around. Even before the inflation was hard. Vehicles don’t run on hopes and dreams and need maintenance.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

Wouldn’t it be great if our wages were keeping up with inflation.

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This is the beauty of self employment. As I said in a previous comment, I'm a driver and one of the apps I work along with my own service give me the ability and freedom to raise my own rates when I feel the need. Truth is though, as it stands, most uber and lyft drivers could make more than enough if the companies were forced to pass on a percentage instead of low balling offers. Very rough math says they could pass on a fixed 80% and charge the rider whatever they feel like at any point in time. This would give them more enough profit along with covering all costs. They won't do this because they are greedy and states/cities won't make them do it because they are stuck in the hourly mindset when most IC work is not hourly. This job is all about miles. Watch dead and wasted time of course but it's not all about the hourly.

[-] nickhammes@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

But it's a tactic, right? They could still make money, if a bit less, by operating in Minneapolis. But they can put pressure on residents to try and get it repealed by stopping, and try to send a message to other cities.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I'm a driver in another state/city but if I lived in Minneapolis I'd be loving this.

Why?

I drive uber, empower (a service launched in my market) and I'm building my own service. Getting uber and lyft kicked out of town will do amazing things for the industry and the drivers and riders. Regional services will pop up and this will help filter out the drivers who know how to run a business and act professionally and those who shouldn't be self employed and customer facing.

I'm on track to pull 6 figures in the next year or two. I'm currently in the process of upgrading to an EV, later this year we will be buying my wife a phev mini van for her to main and I'll use it for business if needed as well as for road trips.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Minnesota: “I’m breaking up with you.” Uber/Lyft: “You’re not breaking up with me, I’m breaking up with you.”

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
256 points (98.5% liked)

News

23320 readers
1422 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS