'Weak' US military unable to fight major conflict: Report (thecradle.co)

submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/news@hexbear.net

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] regul@hexbear.net 63 points 1 year ago

Military industrial complex makes naked demand for more money.

[-] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

Yeah pretty much, but the headline is also true.

[-] regul@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Inshallah

[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

$1.25 trillion isn't enough! take social security and the rest of the education funds now!

[+] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

[deleted]

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 37 points 1 year ago

The motivations of the heritage foundation are obvious. They're shilling for the military industrial complex. However, there are lots of other supporting indicators that the study isn't too far off the mark. US recruitment is below targets, the war in Ukraine has depleted much of the existing stocks, and has shown that a lot of US weapons don't work as advertised. US military industry isn't able to produce basic things like artillery shells at a reasonable rate, and US lacks a trained workforce to increase military production. These are real and tangible problems that don't have simple solutions.

In general, I disagree with the idea of simply dismissing information based on the source. This is how you end up in echo chambers where everybody just repeats the things they want to hear to each other. I think it's more productive to account for the biases of different sources and to evaluate what's being said on its own merits. With a source like the heritage foundation, it's probably worth looking up other collaborating sources, but the mere fact of them having done the study doesn't automatically invalidate it.

[-] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

a lot of US weapons don't work as advertised

I'm not sure about this as much as it shows that the American military industrial complex overall is not set up to fight a peer war. It's been tooled for the last 70 years to fight against opponents that have virtually no choice in the pace of warfare. The high end weapons are fine, but there aren't enough of them to support sustained, high intensity combat.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 1 year ago

That's true, but recall that at the start of the war in Ukraine the narrative very much was that US weapons are superior to Russian weapons, and every time they sent some new toy like HIMARS or Abrams they were sold as game changers. We now have concrete proof that US weapons aren't better in any way.

[-] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

Not game changers doesn't mean ineffective, it just means they aren't magic. An example of a weapons system being blown up doesn't mean it isn't effective - in a peer war, weapons systems should be looked at as consumables. I've no doubt about American perfidy about the capabilities of patriot systems viz a viz hypersonic for example, but flip it around - there have been a number of Russian alligator choppers shot down but they are nevertheless fearsome and effective. The myth of American weapons invincibility has been punctured to be sure but I think it is incorrect to believe that makes them ineffective.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago

I would argue that they are ineffective in a sense that they're too complex, too expensive to produce, and too hard to maintain in the field. The inefficiency of these systems doesn't matter when beating up on a much smaller opponent, but it becomes a huge problem when going up against a peer competitor.

I very much agree that weapons should be looked at as consumables in a peer conflict, and that's precisely what makes US weapons inefficient. It's more expensive and more time consuming to produce them, and they're not as durable as Soviet style weapons Russia is using.

Incidentally, recent French military report notes that Western equipment is considered less efficient than Soviet due to maintenance issues and degraded mode capabilities..

[-] D61@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Not game changers doesn't mean ineffective

As far a the propaganda war side of things, the effect of the weapons was that they MUST be game changers. And since they failed to single handedly turn back Russian troops on any front, that means the equipment was ineffective.

[-] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What you’re saying is true, but also they are advertising the Patriot missile system as having intercepted multiple hypersonics which lmfao no they haven’t.

[-] D61@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

Don't ever forget that when the USA sends its surplus "wonder weapons" to another country these two things, 1) its never the newest stuff, it always older versions that have been sitting in storage yards and warehouses after being rotated out for the next generation or equipment of more recent manufacture and 2) a lot of "sensitive" (meaning "secret") parts are removed or destroyed before being given to another country's military.

Like, an example, So you might see SINGARS or ANCIP field radios, but there's no guarantee that the "little black boxes whose name I have forgotten" used to load and synchronize the frequency hop and encryption protocols between the radios won't be included. Meaning, OPFOR's signals units will being able to listen to radio communications in plain text and have an easier time triangulating location.

Similar issues were happening with the HIMARS (or was it some other artillery pieces..) right? They were sent to Ukraine missing the "sensitive" equipment, which was the parts that aimed the weapon with precision.

[-] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago

did-someone aww did someone try to take over the world but stretched themselves too thin?

[-] itappearsthat@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These articles are just bait to attract more MIC dollars but it probably is true yet does not matter. The military in peacetime (such as it is) is basically just a big destructive shock-absorber to cushion some initial onslaught until everything retools for the long slow grind of whatever type of warfare actually works for that given situation (found by trial & error counted in deaths mostly). Currently they're fully optimized for being able to bomb defenseless civilians anywhere in the entire world given 24 hours notice, which is not really something that will work against the PLA.

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And what has this country done for me? If no one owes me anything, I don't owe the rich anything either.

this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024

59 points (100.0% liked)

news

24207 readers

636 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Alaskaball@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

carpoftruth@hexbear.net

Breath_Of_The_Snake@hexbear.net

context@hexbear.net

Infamousblt@hexbear.net