642
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LarryTheMatador@sh.itjust.works 148 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 42 points 1 year ago

Remember Champ biting specific members of the secret service?

Dogs know. Dogs always know.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's why some rip kids' faces off, they all deserve it.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Also why they shit on grass. They know.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

!fucklawns is leaking (not that there's anything wrong with that).

[-] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Shh, stop being rational, doggos are le magical social creatures

[-] sheilzy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

That was actually Major, their younger dog at the time. Champ was their elderly dog who died a couple years ago. They since got a younger pup, Commander, and he too, has been biting staffers, but I don't know if they revealed which agencies the victims work for. Maybe Commander is copying what his elder brother does, but iirc Major doesn't live in the White House too often nowadays. He might just have the same intuition.

[-] SnowdropDelusion@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

In case anyone, like me, wants a source for Pence refusing to get in the car with the Secret Service. It’s from the book “I Alone Can Fix It.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/04/26/pence-car-raskin-comments/

The “terrified” part is speculation, but potentially true.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Sounds to me like Pence was tipped off.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

I wonder if they would have used 'the VP has been kidnapped by Antifa!' as justification for the insurrection act.

[-] QHC@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They were chanting "hang Pence" and literally, physically building a gallows. The intentions were quite clear.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Do we have any proof that the messages were deleted on the instruction of the White House? I've always thought they arranged the mass-deletion on their own - but it was a very busy time and I might well have missed the bit about them being ordered to delete them.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Well it helped Trump, was against policy, and they answered to him.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

All true. However, there's a difference between being told/ordered to do a thing, and thinking (on your own), "Hey if I do this thing it'll cover my ass and help my side". OP is claiming they were told to do it - and that may be true, but I'd like some proof toward that.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The proof is they wouldn't have done it if they had not been told.

[-] RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What's more likely? That they all independently had the same idea to commit the same crime at the same time, or that their ringleader told them to do it, so they did it?

[-] TechnoBabble@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

If they used SMS those records are still around.

Or did they use something else?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cowfodder@unilem.org 102 points 1 year ago

Some of those that work forces are the same that burn crosses

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Gork@lemm.ee 55 points 1 year ago

Shouldn't background checks for Top Secret clearances that involve employees in closer contact with important government officials screen out those with links to radical ideologies?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

Bold of you to assume the Trump administration would've been screening them out.

[-] LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's a question on the SF-86

https://news.clearancejobs.com/2020/01/12/extremist-groups-and-your-clearance/

The vetting can be done as was done with the National Guard deployed to DC:

https://www.rand.org/blog/2021/02/what-the-capitol-siege-means-for-the-future-of-security.html

Even National Guard members deployed to serve as an extra layer of security at the inauguration were vetted by the FBI to ensure no infiltration by potential insider threats; 12 National Guard members were removed due to security concerns. One Army reservist with a current security clearance and access to a naval munitions depot in New Jersey was also arrested in connection with the assault on the Capitol.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Wow. So much for background checks.

They did the background checks - just not in the way most people expected.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

It feels like one of the flaws in the system is that, while we'd want the agents who surround the president to be vetted more than almost anyone else, it's the executive branch that's responsible and apparently the president can give the okay for someone who doesn't otherwise pass, as we saw happen for his kids. What's to stop a corrupt president from having corrupt USSS agents?

[-] blady_blah@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Do you guys not remember how the SS "accidentally" deleted all the texts from SS agents on the day of Jan 6th? "Whoops! Our bad!" Heads should have rolled big time!

[-] JoJoGAH@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I thought the same thing, these guys had a lot of confidence in doing what they did. They must have had that confidence for a reason,. It also explains the appearance of not having an end plan, if they believed the next stage was not their part of the coup. The next part of the plan we may never actually learn but damn we need to find out where the government has been compromised.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] littlewonder@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

The least cool eye patch wearer.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Dollar store Nick Fury: Nick Missouri

[-] Skiff@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Nick Mildly-Annoyed.

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

I thought it was Nick Fury from the thumbnail

[-] imgonnatrythis@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

You don't think he looks "radical"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 20 points 1 year ago

Well, colour me surprised 9 ways to Sunday and fuck me sideways. You don't say that police attend to associate with right wing terrorists. /s

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago
[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] Yewb@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Some of those at work forces are the same that burn crosses

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago

The degree of rot keeps getting more and more astounding. I say this as someone who is completely unsurprised. Contradiction? Yeah. Both are true at the same time.

[-] Poob@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Cops regularly reach out to far right groups for information

[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Also, far right groups recruit cops and ex-military. The venn diagram of law enforcement to right-wing militia groups has a lot of overlap.

[-] Locuralacura@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

It's a circle.

[-] TvanBuuren@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

Without reading I thought he was a poor man's Nick Fury cosplay....

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
642 points (97.6% liked)

News

23406 readers
1774 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS