113
submitted 6 months ago by testeronious@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 69 points 6 months ago
  1. Being able to follow Bluetooth beacons is far from new.
  2. The listening in is done by the phone apps, which isn't a Bluetooth issue.
[-] tourist@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago

well I hope the NSA likes the same 10 songs on repeat and video essays about cults

actually nah fuck em

I hope they hate it

[-] electricprism@lemmy.ml 24 points 6 months ago

So people are starting to understand Bluetooth is a weapon? Cool beans.

[-] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 11 points 6 months ago

Seems the only way to prevent this is by running a firewall, but you can't run a firewall for Bluetooth connections… Yet.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Using wired headphones works great

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 months ago

That one trick the NSA does not want you to know

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 6 months ago

There's more than one ;)

[-] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 8 points 6 months ago

Just a shame there's nothing to plug them into

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 6 months ago
[-] ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

What headphone jacks?

I know adapters exist, but they were talking about how no mid-high end phone has a headphone jack anymore

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 6 months ago

Idk, buy better phones. There was a couple Pixels that didn't have headphone jacks before the manufacturer realized it was a horrible decision and now. Other than those shitty models, all Pixels have headphone jacks

[-] TurtleTourParty@midwest.social 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The last Pixel to have a headphone jack was the 5A released in 2021. The 6, 6A, 7, 7A, and 8 do not have headphone jacks.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 6 months ago

Wut. They got rid of them, people complained, they added them back, and then they got rid of them again??

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago

The only thing in the article that has to do with wireless headphones is watching for devices in discoverable mode and using that to physically track movements.

Most (all that I know of, but I’m a be generous here!) Bluetooth headphones have to be made discoverable temporarily and turn it off after they’re paired, so this is more like you could be tracked locally by an array of bt receivers if you’re walking around with the button on your headphones held down.

The other thing in the article that applies to all people with phones or computers or whatever is the relatively old news that cops buy data from data brokers instead of doing investigations.

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago

Wait till y'all hear about cell towers.

[-] ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub 8 points 6 months ago

Honestly, Bluetooth sucks. I'm incredibly sick and tired of everything trying to use ancient technology for far more than it was ever intended. Besides, it never works the way it should anyways.

[-] badbrainstorm@lemmy.today -5 points 6 months ago

I once lost a pair of expensive Bose wireless headphones. Somebody told me that I could use the app and track their location. I said, oh hell no, they can keep them! Nice as they were, I will not be purchasing again.

[-] olicvb@lemmy.ca 33 points 6 months ago

No worries, they can track you with every other tech you have instead

[-] badbrainstorm@lemmy.today 5 points 6 months ago

You and all your upvoters like to visit sites about privacy, and give people a hard time for taking measures to protect themselves. Lame

[-] olicvb@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago

yea i dont usually post in any random websites, but that makes sense. I guess i mostly meant what i said thinking it's a waste to toss out something just because of tracking when there are so many other things they can track you with.

[-] badbrainstorm@lemmy.today 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I went back to wired. I'm aware the government will get it elsewhere.

Not paying Bose to have access to it, and sell to whomever they want. Fuck that

Also, you don't know jack shit about my tech. I go out with nothing but a DAP very often.

[-] ISOmorph@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago

But you can make it a lot harder and economically unattractive for them

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Unless it's wired and very primitive

[-] olicvb@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Even then, any mobile phone can be located with triangulation through cellular towers (afaik, are there carrier vpns?)

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Anything that sends requests to any network can be tracked. You can't avoid it. That's why I think having an offline device makes a lot of sense especially for data storage

this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
113 points (95.9% liked)

Privacy

31601 readers
123 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS