59

Hey all, thought this might be of interest to some here.

Wrote about why I moved from NixOS to Ubuntu after using it for several months on my daily driver. Suspect that this take is likely to be kind of controversial and court claims of skill issues, which might even be true.

Let me know what you think.

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Deckweiss@lemmy.world 77 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

tldr:

  • fucking with configs for hours regularly
  • pip & venv doesn't work on nixos
  • DE broke when installed new DM
  • not much community support
[-] mortalic@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

I didn't realize pip and venv didn't work... that's a pretty big deal breaker for a lot of people, myself included.

[-] Faresh@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago

I'm not a Nix user, but doesn't Nix make both pip and venv obsolete in a way? Nix is a package manager (which could be used to package anything including Python packages/modules) and also allows you to create environments that include only certain packages of certain versions.

[-] fd93@programming.dev 14 points 6 months ago

Sounds good in theory, until you want to install scikit-image or other Python libraries which need complex builds.

[-] Corbin@programming.dev 10 points 6 months ago

python3Packages.scikit-image appears to be available and non-broken in nixpkgs; on my machine, I get /nix/store/w8681ncsw92cn4gq6gyraw4z19r0r6c3-python3.11-scikit-image-0.21.0. Do you have an actual example?

I understand your point, but given nixpkgs' position in the community, it might be a moot point.

[-] frozencow@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

pip and venv are working, but packages that require compiling or ship binaries by itself usually won't work out of the box. They depend on gcc or libopenssl to be globally available: the whole gist of Nix not doing ๐Ÿ˜…

I've found devenv.sh to be most convenient way to handle such projects. You can define the dependencies for a project. It has explicit python/venv/requirements.txt/poetry support. It works for NixOS, but also other distros and MacOS. Very convenient to share and lock development tools and libraries across a team.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

fucking with configs for hours regularly

this is the one reason i dont board the hype train for "customizable" distros: arch, nix, gentoo and so on unless im specifically looking to learn.

i use linux so i can install it and forget which distro im actually using.

[-] Deckweiss@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I have been on arch professionally for ~5 years.

I am a GUI fan and I don't like fucking around with the OS. In fact, I don't even want to think about it at all.

So far it hardly required any maintenance (much less than Ubuntu, Windows or Mac, at least for my workflows).

And the only fucking around I did with it was the first two days setting everything up just the way I like.

To be fair, I already had extensive linux knowledge at the point of switching to arch - through ~4 years of constantly breaking my Debians and Ubuntus every couple of months.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

i find arch to sometimes break on updates for me. it always turns out to be either:

1- bleeding edge package update made it bleed 2- needed to be watching announcements and change some config file 3- i havent updated in a while and it dislikes that.

i like having 100% automatic updates.

[-] Deckweiss@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Depends on what yoy install I guess.

It only broke twice for me from updates during the 5 year period. 1. grub 2. openjdk

and the openjdk one simply didn't update until I uninstalled the old one and reinstalled the new one.

[-] wargreymon2023@sopuli.xyz -2 points 6 months ago

it is for advanced users

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.de 25 points 6 months ago

Since I bricked my Debian setup in an unfortunate accident involving compiling from source

How on earth?

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 16 points 6 months ago

I have actually done that once. Somehow managed to make install glibc over libc5 or something like that.

That was a while ago, though.

[-] fd93@programming.dev 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Debian really doesn't like installing different versions of GUI libraries & their dependencies.

I really like Pantheon Files.

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 2 points 6 months ago

Pantheon Files is the best, i also compiled it from source when i was stuck on Pop!

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I know, I've once messed around to install a newer QT framework which was required by some package I've downloaded directly. Did you install them from the repos or manually copied the files into place? At first I thought the issues were due to compiling source code, not installing conflicting libraries.

[-] fd93@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I actually can't remember as it would have been 6+ months ago now. The issue is probably fixed already by the Debian maintainers / Elementary Team / both.

Likely something with Meson build / apt not playing nicely.

[-] suy@programming.dev 8 points 6 months ago

I've been compiling apps depending on newer Qt and/or kdelibs versions for ages (back when the repository was literally called "kdelibs", about 20 years ago).

This has never been an issue for me. Even with autoconf/automake, I just compiled everything to its own prefix, so it doesn't interfere with the system at all. You don't even need to fix the build system in the cases where it's broken/lacks features, if you leverage all the "path" variables (CPATH, LIBRARY_PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, PKG_CONFIG_PATH, etc.). But autotools, cmake, qmake, and every build system I've used so far supports this out of the box.

Not claiming it's a skill issue, but I have to say I'm very surprised by reading any of this.

Specifically, for Debian, I was told 20 years ago by a very wise person "you never do make install on Debian, specially not for the kernel", and taught me how to use make-kpkg (or something like that, I don't remember the name of the tool), which was a way to make a debian package of a self built kernel, which is obviously something that can't be installed to its own prefix.

[-] duhdugg@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago

I also don't understand. For compiling from source, why not use podman or docker to just compile everything into a tarball that can be extracted into /opt? I used to do this all the time when installing multiple php versions on a CentOS machine.

[-] GarlicToast@programming.dev 20 points 6 months ago

I really don't get it, I moved to NixOS some years ago. Okay, first few months I had to fiddle with configurations and add some packages that were missing. Everything past those early months was a blast.

Replacing a dead laptop? The most time consuming part (for me) is making a bootable USB. After that I can push my already ready made configuration and just back to where I was (backs ups are important).

Working on different versions of Python? No problem, a small nix script for each environment.

Working with different versions of GCC? Same as Python.

Everything just works. And if I fuck around I can revert the change. I can easily experiment in a way that will no fuck affect my ability to work.

At work we have Ubuntu, and I got the conclusion that nuking Canonical's offices will be a blessing on humanity. They manage to deliver broken packages for years, even packages that work well on Debian.

[-] eveninghere@beehaw.org 16 points 6 months ago

While many of the issues with Debian can be resolved by compiling from source, this has been one of the main causes of system failure for me in the past. It also requires equal or greater effort than playing with Nixfiles.

I guess you are doing something wrong here. I can't imagine that compiling stuff on Debian would be trickier than tinkering with NixOS.

Maybe you have been following advices on the web instead of taking the time to understand problems and keep your Debian tidy?

Besides, between an expert niche like NixOS and the popular Ubuntu, there are more than a dozen OSes you can consider when it comes to preferences on maintenance. You don't have to consider so many, but a blog article on your particular three / four (NixOS, Debian Ubuntu + Mint) looks a bit off.

[-] fd93@programming.dev 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've tried Arch and others as well, even stuff like Slackware, Bodhi, Void, but I'd say that my preference has generally moved away from doing tinkering / maintenance at all other than for fun or profit. I'd still consider Nix for a server / workstation setup but just not as a daily driver.

[-] Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip 6 points 6 months ago

I may be a touch biased, but I feel like you might enjoy trying Gentoo one day, especially with the recent official binary package host.

[-] fd93@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

I keep meaning to try Gentoo out but haven't gotten round to it. I think it didn't like VirtualBox or something?

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago

Makes sense. NixOS isn't for everybody and that's fine.

For people like me who don't change things on the regular, it's fine. But using the latest and greatest or having to customise stuff is really a drag. Getting a new electron app on nixpkgs can take a long time because doing it yourself is pain. It's easier to hope somebody else will deal with that pain.

Have fun on Ubuntu.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I run nix unstable, so I get all the latest software. It's actually been very stable for me, and I love knowing I can rollback at any time if something happens to break.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

By latest and greatest I meant stuff not packaged in nixpkgs yet.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

I know it's not for everyone, but creating your own nix derivation for software that doesn't exist yet on nixpikgs is not terribly difficult (for most things).

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago

It varies wildly, in my experience. A binary package in nix? For sure, easy. Any programming language with its own ecosystem: good luck. Python, JS, and anything electron is hilariously difficult to package when anything goes wrong. If it doesn't work at the 5th try, gotta get ready for a long night.

Even C/C++ projects that should "just work" with mkDerivation are far from trivial, but that's also due to how shit the ecosystems of those languages are. "have A,B,C installed on ubuntu 18.04" and then you find out that there are actually a bunch more dependencies, or gcc is too recent, or you have to mess with the LD_LIBRARY_PATH, or or or or.

There have been very, very few packages that I found trivial to package. nix is very good at exposing hidden dependencies.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] praetor@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 6 months ago

Yes and no. It depends on what your aim is. I LOVE Nix and it runs like a beast on my ZBook. But I'm after reproducible environments I can just blast around on all over the place without a heavy imagining solution. Works great for that.

Does it take some time to setup as a daily driver? Yes. But no more than Arch. But the thing with Nix is if you already have a robust config, it takes less time than Arch to go from zero to stomping out code.

Ubuntu is a great generic distro. But I find Nix gives me oomph. As with everything in this ecosphere...use what works for YOU! ๐Ÿ˜

[-] SirDimples@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago

I like reading about OS journeys like these. Personally I ended up living with immutable fedora despite of its endless challenges, but I don't think I'll ever go back to mutable linux for my dev laptop. I feel immutability is a shield against change over time.

[-] tinocofaidh@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

Didn't really look into NixOS so only learned that it is an immutable OS after reading your article.

I once tried Fedora Sericea. Ended up having many Toolboxes (like Distrobox) with libraries and tools for development, but only a couple of Flatpaks.

I think the ideal user for immutable OS will be someone who want to use computer like a smartphone, just install apps (as Flatpaks) and let the OS do its update things.

[-] eveninghere@beehaw.org 13 points 6 months ago

NixOS is a reproducible OS. I wouldn't call it immutable.

[-] oessessnex@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

It's not really fully reproducible either.

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

Isn't it fully reproducible with flakes?

[-] oessessnex@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago

Nope, nix doesn't ensure or require that the builds are deterministic. It's not any better in that regard than other package managers.

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

nix doesn't ensure or require that the builds are deterministic

Pin package version and --pure?

That should already allow it to be ahead of other PMs.

[-] oessessnex@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

A package is reproducible if you use the same inputs, run the build, and get the same outputs.

The issue is that the build can produce different outputs given the same inputs. So you need to modify the build or patch the outputs. This is something that is being worked on by most distributions: https://reproducible-builds.org/who/projects/

NixOS is not special in that regard nor are all NixOS packages reproducible.

[-] sxt@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Nixos is immutable to force system configuration through the declarative nix configs/build system not to limit tinkering.

[-] bungle_in_the_jungle@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Someone recently recommended PopOs to me. Any thoughts on that?

[-] mihnt@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago

Great beginner distro for sure. On par with Mint with "it just works".

[-] fd93@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They're between releases right now, but once COSMIC desktop is ready and they release Pop 24.04 I'll probably try it out. More likely that I'm moving to Xubuntu Minimal 24.04 on the daily driver though.

PopOS is great OOTB but I've become attached to rofi and XFCE recently and like the old-school "apps are utilities" style of Linux desktops over PopOS / Mint which try to bundle everything together.

[-] mihnt@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Xubuntu Minimal 24.04

Why not just do Mint XFCE then? At least that way there's no snap to deal with.

[-] franklin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's honestly one of my favorite distros and has a lot of unique awesome features and guides for beginners.

Discord has some rough edges if you use it regularly but it definitely still works.

[-] dyc3@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Damn I was considering switching to Nix because I was annoyed at fl studio and various other kinda niche stuff breaking all the time. This has made me seriously reconsider.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

More serious than this is the rare occasions Nix packages conflict with each other. While Nix separates dependencies, it doesn't separate them as absolutely as a full container system like Docker. Therefore it is possible, albeit unlikely, to end up with conflicts between versions of installed libraries.

Never tried it but thanks for dispelling the hype. What a meme OS.

this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
59 points (81.1% liked)

Programming

17314 readers
291 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS