128
submitted 6 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

I can understand that, but they need to focus right now. Broadening into a larger movement needs to wait until the genocide is over. Otherwise it ends up getting diluted as people splinter off for different causes.

[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

Absolutely.

The occupy wall street movement failed partly due to a similar issue. There were no set demands and kind of ballooned out in terms of set of issues to be addressed.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It happened before that too. I remember during an anti-Iraq war march before the war in 2003... a massive march in L.A. People were chanting anti-Bush and pro-peace slogans, and then the chants changed into things about Palestine and Haiti. And I was there thinking, "I sympathize with both of those issues, but I thought we were here to protest an upcoming war in Iraq?" And then the anarchists took over and started smashing things and the cops came in and the helicopter started flying low and it all went to shit. When we were supposed to be marching for peace on the eve of war.

Edit: And then there was the guy on the sidelines with a bullhorn chastising all of the people marching with, "how can you be in favor of peace if you eat meat?" Again- I don't eat meat but pick a better time.

Not only is it a bad idea from within, it looks bad from the outside too. People think that your cause isn't enough, that you have to find other things to get worked up about. Maybe it's not that big a deal in that case...

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

And then the anarchists took over and started smashing things and the cops came in and the helicopter started flying low and it all went to shit.

Do you realize that the common trait between all of those protest movements is that they unabashedly portrayed themselves as nonviolent?

There’s some level of irony in blaming anarchists for giving cops an excuse to turn things violent, in a conversation about nonviolent protestors, demonstrating in support of violent protestors in another country, getting violently dispersed by the cops. Nonviolent protest has never engendered lasting, meaningful change. People are certainly welcome to choose only nonviolent action for themselves if that is what fits their personal ethical framework, but they shouldn’t dismiss violent action as being action that separates their causes. Nonviolent action, paired with the vilification of violent action, is one of the ways the status quo is maintained.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Well, the cops didn't move in until they started smashing windows.

I was there, you weren't.

Do tell me though, how did smashing windows in Hollywood help the cause for peace?

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

Give The Failure of Nonviolence by Peter Gelderloos a read. To make it ridiculously easy here’s a copy: http://libgen.rs/search.php?req=the+failure+of+nonviolence&lg_topic=libgen&open=0&view=simple&res=25&phrase=1&column=def

[-] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 1 points 6 months ago

+1

Hopefully we can learn from past movements like Occupy, which were unfocused, and apply the lessons learned to future protests, like this Gaza one. It kind of scared me when they said larger struggle, because it brought me immediately back to Occupy, like you said.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago

Yeah. I want students, faculty everywhere to bring that energy to fight for every cause be it veganism, class struggle, labour, etc.

The main thing though is that people can't lose sight of the goal. The police response to campus protests brings to the forefront the lopsided treatment of any dissent toward the genocide, no matter how peaceful the dissent is. It brings to national attention that these protests aren't anti-Semitic in the slightest, yet they are repeatedly characterized as violent terrorism.

Just like in class solidarity, some detractors are purposefully trying to unfocus the narrative by saying "well how about this cause? Don'tcha care about that?" They do this since dividing and conquering is a powerful method to steal power from the masses. Don't fall for it. Keep the target on de-funding the army that is commiting the Gaza genocide.

[-] tearsintherain@leminal.space 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This is heartwarming. I don't worry about them losing focus, and believe this is something bigger. These are roots that hopefully grow into a strong tree with many branches. We need to get younger folks into politics and positions of leadership. It's not as though they'll have a choice considering how badly the previous generations and their systems have created a grossly fractured and inequitable world with a planet on the brink. Article text: https://dnyuz.com/2024/05/01/its-not-just-gaza-student-protesters-see-links-to-a-global-struggle/

this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
128 points (93.2% liked)

News

23276 readers
4086 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS