413
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] A_A@lemmy.world 227 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

11th violation of gag order : lock him up.

[-] DemBoSain@midwest.social 73 points 6 months ago

No, it's okay. He deleted it and nobody saw it. Absolutely nobody. Any rumors otherwise are just that, rumors.

[-] Kid_Thunder@kbin.social 34 points 6 months ago

He's not getting locked up. I doubt he'll even be sentenced to any time in a cell even if he's found guilty. He's not even going to get probation. He's going to completely show that the Justice system once again is not equal and fair but not for the reasons he will continue to whine about.

[-] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago

Lock him up and Epstein away the key.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 22 points 6 months ago

Why would you turn off the cameras and hang his key from the bars of his cell? That sounds like the easiest prison break ever

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

not to someone with short arms.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

What, real consequences for deliberately and publicly ignoring yet another court order? You must be imagining if one of us was a defendant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 182 points 6 months ago

She detailed having met Trump at a golf tournament in 2006, when she was 27 years old and — as she tells it — Trump was already older than her father.

I'm sorry to be pedantic, but wasn't he always older than her father? Like, that's how age works.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 52 points 6 months ago

You should absolutely be pedantic about a paid, published article having writing like that. It’s not some random internet comment from someone who may or may not have graduated high school, this was approved by multiple people who allegedly went to college for the writing related jobs they have. It should at least pass the “does this make sense if you think about it at all for more than 5 seconds” test.

And yeah I know reporters and writers facing the same overwork/underpay squeeze as everyone else. This is more about the corporations that run these papers and magazines being responsible for things deteriorating to this point.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 13 points 6 months ago

I think you could also read it as "was already [so old he was] older than her father."

[-] androogee@midwest.social 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's the same reading. That doesn't change the meaning at all. Am I taking crazy pills?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 50 points 6 months ago

I used to be older than my little brother.

I still am, but I used to, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 38 points 6 months ago

No, he paid for age reduction surgery in 2017.

[-] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 months ago

I'd say they should give him his money back, but we all know he never paid the bill in the first place.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 32 points 6 months ago

My dad stopped aging in 2015

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago
[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 19 points 6 months ago

Thank you, that's very sweet of you. While my statement was a bit tongue-in-cheek, if I live to see my 60th birthday, I'll officially be older than my father ever was.

Maybe it's one of those "at the time, Trump was older than my father ever was" kind of statements

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Could be older then...Than her father is now... But who knows.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 77 points 6 months ago

Maybe he pulled it back to proofread for spelling, grammar and clarity

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 43 points 6 months ago

Or to fact check it. He doesn't seem like the type to jump the gun

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago

Ladies and gentlemen, let me tell you something. Tremendous things, really. So, I tweeted something, and people are saying, “Donald, what’s going on with that tweet?” And I said, “Look, folks, it was a tremendous tweet, the best tweet, believe me.” But then, I thought, maybe it was too tremendous. Maybe it was too powerful. So, I deleted it. And people are saying, “Wow, that’s leadership.” And they’re right. Because I’m a leader, and leaders lead.

[-] TheFlopster@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

Little bit too coherent. And he would never second guess a decision he claims he made.

Maybe trail off in the middle of a sentence, and then mutter something about the liberals making Twitter delete it? Because everyone is in awe of how much sense he makes, and how right he is all the time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 6 months ago

You didn't go off on a random tangent halfway through. Not believable.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

He wouldn't want a repeat of the embarrassing 'hamberder' incident, which haunts him to this day.

[-] kofe@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Only the best covfefe

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 77 points 6 months ago

The former president seemingly remembered that violating his gag order by commenting on witnesses could land him in jail

Oh, he remembered. He just thinks he's playing 4D chess by tweeting then deleting because "it doesn't count."

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago

I really don't think he can retain anything he finds boring for more then 5 minutes. He's not playing imagery 4D chess. He really is that stupid.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago

Bet he didnt delete it

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 35 points 6 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

Dumbfuck has never heard the term 'surprise witness.' And this one wasn't even a surprise. Of course she testified.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 6 months ago

Now he’s threatening me with JAIL, & THEY HAVE NO CASE

I thought this shithead was ready to go to jail for ~~speaking his mind~~ committing multiple contempts of court. I guess that's not the case when it's not him talking.

Merchan ruled as court began that Daniels can testify about her alleged sexual encounter with Trump and “how she felt about it,” but that he didn’t want to hear any of the nitty-gritty regarding the alleged affair with Daniels. We don’t need to know the details of intercourse,” Merchan said. Prosecutors assured the court that Daniels would not be describing “genitalia” in her testimony, ensuring the jury would not be subjected to another mushroom-comparison session.

Anyone else notice the closing parentheses but no opening paren? Again, I'm sick of not having proper copy-editors in journalism!

Look, I'm just gonna say what no one else is brave enough to say: he's awesome, let's elect him again, it's ok when he breaks the law. Fucking pig.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

He deleted it therefor not contempt of court.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago

Meaning he posted it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
413 points (98.4% liked)

News

23360 readers
1918 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS