US commander needs to keep his gob shut.

Careless talk costs lives.

I am very sure that there are British special forces in Ukraine.

After one of his visits to Ukraine, Michael Kofman was being interviewed about the possibility of soldiers going in and partway through started laughing and said "if anyone has people there, I'm sure the British do". The interviewer asked him why he thought that and he laughed even harder and said "let's just call it one analyst's guess".

My guess is that they're present and that it's an open secret that they're there, but that the British government chooses not to officially announce the fact.

Later, they had that German military discussion that leaked and IIRC they said that the British had about 50 people in Ukraine, more than anyone else...IIRC we in the US had 17. The Brits were doing things like helping target British weapons (and French weapons, as IIRC the French didn't have anyone present). The Germans were talking about having the British target their weapons too if they decided to send Taurus missiles, so that they could avoid putting anyone in-country.

Well duh, special forces are one of our specialities.

This should not really be surprising to anyone, given that training others is a part of their mission set. Does anyone doubt MI6 is active there, pursuing the missions they've been trained for?

That said, I'm surprised a Green Beret team doesn't already come with a cyber guy. I mean, yeah, that's probably a good idea to have someone that can monitor and work in the information space when you're doing a long-term deployment overseas. Probably want a drone/EW guy too.

Anybody who is surprised by this is either hugely naive, knows nothing about previous British military tactics or has been under a rock for the last 40 years.

When the invasion kicked off, like day 0, SF assets all over the place were ready to bounce and get in there. I know at least one GROM and UK guy who were training their counterparts in case they got told they could support.

But, as others have said, these are more akin to advisors than "behind the lines" active missions. If you don't think everyone has someone backing up the tax dollars they're sending, you're naive at best.

This is the best summary I could come up with:

"A 12-person detachment might be up-gunned," Fenton said, explaining that as warfare becomes more high-tech, there may be a need for teams to have a cyber expert, an Air Force pilot, or a cryptologist, for example.

Fenton said that British commandos have required Royal Air Force pilots' advice on drone operations and needed navy personnel "to help them understand, more than a SOF (special operations forces) teammate could, the way a ship in the Black Sea navigates."

Indeed, the possibility of Western powers openly sending military units to fight Putin's forces has gained momentum in recent months, with President Emmanuel Macron saying he'd consider dispatching French soldiers.

In a statement to Business Insider, a Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: "It is the long-standing policy of successive governments not to comment on UK Special Forces."

Meanwhile, the radical idea of Western troops being officially sent to Ukraine has been floated by French President Emmanuel Macron.

Macron said he'd consider sending troops "if the Russians were to break through the front lines" or "if there were a Ukrainian request—which is not the case today."

The original article contains 527 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!