107
submitted 6 months ago by nulluser@programming.dev to c/news@lemmy.world
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 39 points 6 months ago

Drinking "raw milk" puts everyone at risk and should be illegal.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 21 points 6 months ago

It's mostly illegal to sell it. I think just for processing/cooking (cheesemaking) is it legally sold for. But idiots have no qualms about breaking the law by lying.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Not in Oklahoma they fought hard to make it legal here. Remember the fight over it years ago.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 3 points 6 months ago
[-] scoobford@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

It supposedly tastes much better. I'm sure there's also a few conspiracy nuts who think pasteurization makes you weaker for the jewish takeover or something.

It's also a personal liberty issue. People don't like being told they can't do something, and while I agree with bans on consumption of raw milk, we should critically analyze any law where the government tells private citizens what to do or not do. Especially when there isn't clear harm being done to another person.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 1 points 6 months ago

Especially when there isn’t clear harm being done to another person.

We have lots of laws to protect people from themselves and from the lies of corporations and such. Seatbelt and helmet laws are the most obvious. We can't, as a society, expect people to be an expert on every subject. So people make laws to enforce certain actions to protect people from ignorance and misinformation. Hopefully these laws get passed after a lot of scientific evidence shows they are necessary and not political bigotry like cannabis bans and such.

[-] scoobford@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

That's actually exactly my point. We should carefully examine whether the infringement is worth the benefit before blindly letting the government do whatever.

In the case of seatbelt laws, it is worth it because people are really bad at understanding inertia, and wearing a seatbelt isn't a burden to anyone. In the case of raw milk, it's worth it because tuberculosis is fucking horrifying and very contagious.

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's mostly legal. It's legal to sell raw milk in 29 states, though most have some regulation around it.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/raw-milk-legal-states

[-] runeko@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago

Illegal in Wisconsin: the dairy state. Perhaps they know something we all should know. Perhaps we should follow suit.

[-] Sewer_King@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Where's Upton Sinclair when you need him?

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago
[-] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago

They’re are essentially trying to catch the disease and spread it via misunderstood science. Their stupidity puts us all at risk. It’s the same reason as any other law - stupidity and ignorance is not an excuse to fuck over the rest of us.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world -5 points 6 months ago

Pasteurization kills viruses. So no. Not really.

[-] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Right. Raw milk is not pasteurized. Thats the whole point - they are drinking milk that has the live virus on purpose. Viruses can then spread from person to person. So while I wont drink unpasteurized milk, those who do will still put the rest of us at risk.

[-] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 11 points 6 months ago

Does the article not explain this?

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Maybe make it legal only if consumed directly from the teat?

[-] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 37 points 6 months ago

I'm petty sure a lump of moldy cheese has better critical thinking skills than these nuggets

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 16 points 6 months ago

Didn’t we just confirm the first animal-to-human transmission of H5N1?

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 4 points 6 months ago

It's happened a handful of times around the world, passing from livestock to human. It hasn't yet ever passed from human to human, fortunately, but contact with infected livestock (or, potentially, drinking infected milk) is how a virus might evolve to better infect humans.

[-] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Handful of cases only in the US. Globally there were around 900 cases to date (starting 2003).

[-] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Sounds like natural selection

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 57 points 6 months ago

If only this would remain within the idiot population. The increased risk of them getting infected and allowing the virus to mutate in a way that makes it more virulent/transmissible in humans is bad for everyone.

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 24 points 6 months ago

It may be but we will all pay the price. It's jumped from Avians to Mammals (cows) it probably has jumped to cats, and in one case may have jumped to humans already.

[-] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 11 points 6 months ago

The folks behind The Great Barrington Declaration who believed in herd immunity for COVID now get to reap what they sow.

[-] kd45@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

Babe wake up, the new stupid thing has dropped

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Self correcting problem until they spread it.

this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
107 points (94.2% liked)

News

23320 readers
1512 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS