133
submitted 5 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago

They better hurry up, or the ~~mental patients~~ astronauts scheduled to fly on it might finally come to their senses and realize that NASA is sending them into space in a capsule made by Boeing.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Come on, it's not like they'd forget to make sure they put all the bolts on everything or anything like that. Right? Right...?

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 months ago

Or verify O-rings and insulation were installed correctly.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I have it direct from the CEO of Boeing, it's just a minor "quality escape". nothing to worry about, we have them all the time.

When questioned further on what exactly is a "quality escape" he got confused, and failed to give a coherent answer.
But apparently Boeing does not recognize faults, because faults are bad, instead they have occasional quality escapes, which are OK, and not a big deal.

https://www.businessinsider.com/boeing-ceo-says-alaska-airlines-blowout-caused-by-quality-escape-2024-1

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

Corporate euphemisms are out of control

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 months ago

Corporations are out of control.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Honestly, I find it contemptible, it's always an attempt to spin something, either to tone it down or to sound clever or something, sometimes it's even decidedly misleading. It's sickening IMO.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

"Quality escape" isn't a euphemism. It's the term for a defect being missed in inspection.

[-] SouthFresh@lemmy.ml 15 points 5 months ago

Seems like that response from the CEO was a bit of a quality escape

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 5 points 5 months ago

He needs a quality wrangler

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

North American Aviation (NAA) made a better command module out of 1960s technology than what Boeing could ever dream of.

Sadly NAA (later Rockwell) was bought out by Boeing.

They're like the Microsoft of aerospace. Buy out competition and then kill what they just aquired.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

I understand the sentiment, and I’m definitely not a Boeing apologist. But the first version of the Apollo command module killed three astronauts. They had growing pains, too.

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

How much money have these crooks bilked the taxpayer for so far?

[-] fubarx@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago
[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Why should we attend to the words of an ex-painter edgelord?

[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I had to check if that was actually there because at first I just couldn’t believe. It’s actually there. The author of this piece just casually put a section titled “Threat” under their contact details, as if that’s a normal thing you include when you share your writing.

[-] HornyOnMain@fedia.io 2 points 5 months ago

Based, unless the article is also bad in which case I'll change my answer to cringe.

[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 1 points 5 months ago

It's cringe no matter how you slice it.

this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
133 points (98.5% liked)

News

23190 readers
3967 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS