Liking Vaporeon is reactionary.

Nah toasters are fucking bullshit devices, you're telling me that you seriously need a device that burns a specific type of bread which is already cooked an wrapped in plastic? y'all couldn't fit this specific thing into a tool with multiple purposes? like I'm pretty sure you can toast toast bread using just a pan, extremely niche bullshit that until very recently I thought only existed in cartoons

You looked around you kitchen halfway through writing this post didn't you?

If you don't make your morning toast over the flames of a burning cop car you're a liberal.
No exceptions.

toaster ovens are superior to toasters in every way except for taking up more counter space

Death to America

Tongue condoms are reactionary. A real revolutionary eats the pussy raw.

Comrades! Are chairs not fascist!?

The word reactionary us reactionary because it was "created" in reaction to reactionaries.

You made a solid point, oatmeal and cooked yeast should be the only allowed meal for subtropicaloids like most anglos

But what if I freeze my bread for longevity and have to toast it to thaw it?

Oh yeah you want a hot take. You want to start shit? Rice cookers are bourgeois. Use a pot like Allah intended

I think we should discuss that the power dynamics of what makes the toaster possible to build, operate, and distribute itself.

One could argue that the toaster, in its very function, represents a resistance to progress and a reversion to more primitive means of food preparation. For is not the act of slowly browning bread over an open flame a vestige of a bygone era, before the advent of advanced cooking technologies?

Furthermore, the toaster's reliance on simplistic, mechanical controls could be seen as a rejection of the sophisticated, digital interfaces that have come to define modern appliances. This adherence to a more rudimentary design aesthetic may be interpreted as a reactionary stance against the relentless march of technological innovation.

Additionally, the toaster's ubiquity in households across the societal spectrum could be viewed as a symbol of cultural stagnation - a stubborn refusal to embrace novel culinary methods or innovative food preparation appliances. In this light, the toaster becomes a bastion of the status quo, resisting the transformative forces of culinary progress.

Yet, one might also contend that the toaster, in its humble efficiency and widespread acceptance, represents a pragmatic compromise between tradition and modernity. For is it not the role of the toaster to strike a balance, to provide a reliable and accessible means of transforming the humble slice of bread into a delectable, golden-hued delight?

In the end, Toasters are reactionary only in the reactionary's hands.

toaster? just use your oven lmao

Beanis is reactionary

It is actually insane how much processing it takes to make toast though

You can use your oven to toast bread just fine! You don't need a specialised bit of equipment just for cooking bread!

i enjoy oatmeal thank you

To make it an authentic hexbear struggle session i'll come in and have an extremely strong opinion and very normal moment on it and then get banned 18 hours after the thread gets locked when i could simply be left alone at that point

anyway toast your bread in a frying pan you bourgeois scum

Ice cream is proletarian, sorbet is reactionary and bourgeois