192

World has ‘moral responsibility’ to help small island states survive climate crisis – UN agency chief (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Vulnerable economies must be supported with finance and practical aid to find long term solutions, says Jorge Moreira da Silva of Unops

The world has a “moral responsibility” to support the fight for survival being faced by small island states, according to a leading UN agency chief.

Ahead of the fourth annual conference of small island developing states (Sids) being held in Antigua and Barbuda this week, Jorge Moreira da Silva, the executive director of the (Unops), called for recognition of the problems faced by what he called “some of the most vulnerable economies in the world” who contributed less than 1% to global carbon emissions.

“Because of their unique circumstances and vulnerabilities, Sids face higher levels of debt distress than other developing countries,” said da Silva. “Over 40% of Sids are now on the edge of, or are already grappling with, unsustainable levels of debt. And with every major disaster, private external debt in Sids tends to rise. Between 2016 and 2020, Sids have paid in debt service 18 times more than what they received as climate finance.

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

The world had the moral responsibility to never let the climate crisis happen in the first place, so we've seen how far moral responsibility has gotten us.

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 12 points 5 months ago

Sure. Gonna put that next to all of the other moral failings.

[-] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 months ago

Which do you think will become the first famous climate refugees? Residents of small island nations losing land and safety, or heat affected landmasses that become uninhabitable due to extreme temperatures and/or wet bulb conditions?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Mexico City in a few months.

[-] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Tough choice GB but I'll go with option B. What do I win?

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[-] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

Probably a lifetime of hardship when shit starts hitting the fan for reals. Here's to hoping you and I are in a good zone when this all collapses.

[-] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah I hope the best for you too. I was trying to lighten the mood but it is going to get dark before it gets any better.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago

I think the oil corporations and others that destroy the environment have a greater responsibility

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 months ago

Yes, and our western economies and democracies are best situated to make them pay. Those bastards are the rotted flower that bloomed from our corpus

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

...and it comes right after our fiduciary responsibility to shareholders.

[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

Capitalists are profiting off their misfortune, business as usual.

[-] HowRu68@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

That would be great if economies would chip in. Idk, USA, EU has some plans iirc, Saudi, Chinese , India etc.

And the Billionaires worldwide as well , they pack a wallet the size of some countries.

this post was submitted on 27 May 2024

192 points (96.6% liked)

World News

39021 readers

1006 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.