The "appearance" button seen on Dutch wikipedia is able to change the SIZE of the font (text) and the width of the article. This is extremely nice to have, but it's not there on any English article...
I don't know what the answer to your question is, but I love the way tekst is spelt.
I am Groot.
*Ik ben
yea I guess it has a visual ring to it
Pagina
Breed groot pagina
Fun fact: in Dutch the word pagina is pronounced exactly the same as vagina
Well, not exactly the same, but they rhyme, yes.
Pagina schmagina
Besides Dutch, tekst is a word used in Albanian, Danish, Estonian, Icelandic, Norwegian, Polish, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish
Also in all Cyrillic languages since those don't have an X letter and have to use ks (ΠΊΡ) instead
Lithuanian has tekstas it is just two letters away from tekst .
And in Finnish we use "teksti"
SMS is "tekstiviesti"
Scandinavian languages also spell it like that, as it's closely related to Dutch without (much) french influence.
The only words I can remember that we spell with X as place names such as Texas and Mexico.
Edit: dutch, not german
In Swedish we spell it text.
Well, you swedes also eat Kex, if my memory serves me right. X seems a lot more common in swedish than noggie.
We Finns use ks instead of x as well.
Alexander would be Aleksanteri and so forth.
I wanted to make a joke about the Swedes but then I googled it and there was a thorough Quora answer, so I'll link that instead.
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-X-used-a-lot-in-Swedish-but-not-in-Norwegian-and-Danish
Yeah, I speak German, but in German it's spelt Text.
Current Setting: Breed Groot
~~Droom groot~~ Breed groot
It does have it but its in the settings menu instead. I believe the different language versions of Wikipedia are maintained by different groups so that's probably why.
this settings page does not exist on desktop, only on the mobile version. If I go to en.m.wikipedia.org I can see it on desktop, but it's not on en.wikipedia.org. It also does not save settings from mobile version to desktop version...
Individual Wikipedias have individual designs and Individual design features.
is there no overhaul to copy ideas from one to another? Or overseer to somewhat keep a consistent theming?
Technically these kinds of things are decided by the Wikimedia Foundation but they'll usually not do things that the editing community of the local wiki doesn't want.
In 2014 the WMF forced a new software feature (Media Viewer) on all wikis and enforced this by "superprotecting" the JavaScript on the German-language Wikipedia so local admins (who at one point even blocked the Deputy Director of the WMF from editing) couldn't disable the new media viewer. The WMF doesn't really want these kinds of constitutional crises to happen again.
weird
I remember when "new" Wikipedia came out with big press I was confused because it had already been in use on the French wiki for months.
My guess is as the biggest wiki, the English wiki is naturally more conservative on the rollout of new features.
other languages are just guinea pigs for the English wiki I gather
I would be very surprised if it wasn't voluntary, as far as I know each Wiki is maintained independently with very little oversight.
This is all a conspiracy by big Font.
buys Dutch bathroom scale and turns into Marvel character
Ik ben Groot!
ben, not bin
Okeydoke, fixed!
I actually wonder if he's still called that in Dutch.
You and me both π
Update: I checked and apparently they pronunciation is significantly different so that he doesn't in fact just go around bragging about how big he is π
I love how funny they can make it.
I like to use Wikiwand, it's a browser addon that overhauls the wikipedia UI.
I was curious so I added it and now Wikipedia is full of ads. No like.
That's weird, I don't see any ads when using it. Are you using the official extension? https://www.wikiwand.com/
You may be using something that counteracts the ads. Such as an ad blocker.
Ah yeah that's probably it
I added it through Firefox extensions. I can upload a screenshot if it's helpful.
TIL we have it. That is very useful, thank you!
Maybe it's a default feature for all non-English languages to account for potential writing system differences? May not make as much a difference for other languages using the Latin alphabet, but maybe for East Asian scripts or Arabic or Hindi etc., they don't want to assume the default layout is as readable as it is for English?
Just a shot-in-the-dark guess.
well the english wiki does have the wide layout option through the square button on the bottom left, ever since the new layout revamp. Just not the font size option.
Maybe the firefox reader button can help but it kind of messes the whole formatting of the page
There's a button in the bottom right to make the page wide. As for text size, I guess it's kind of redundant since you can just zoom in the page.
using the browser zoom makes the layout narrower again, as if it's actively trying to reverse the wide layout by the button in the bottom right. It makes the page very weird looking. Just far from ideal.
EDIT: it's also very inconvenient since my browser saves the zoom level per website (not between en.wikipedia and nl.wikipedia) so the zoom would always be off when going from one article to one in the other language.
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~