83
submitted 5 months ago by Pips@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago

Brave souls. Space is one thing, but Boeing... Godspeed heroes!

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

It's ok, I heard they didn't use any 737-MAX parts on this rocket.

[-] rbn@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I thought all these planes were crashing because they didn't have enough 737-MAX parts. Like some bolts and screws missing here and there...

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Nah the crashes were due to criminal negligence by Boeing when they added control and navigation features that the pilots weren't trained on how to use, how to disable, or even the fact that these new features existed. They also made the new automatic control feature (called MCAS) reliant on a single sensor. Guess what, then they had sensor failures on that single point of failure and the planes flew themselves into the ground while the pilots had no idea what was going on. Oh and the warning lights that would tell the pilots that something was wrong? Optional equipment, sold by Boeing. Neither of the carriers whose planes crashed had purchased that 'optional' safety package.

The lack of parts issue blew out a door in flight, but the plane didn't crash and nobody was killed thankfully. But that started the investigation that showed how badly Boeing has been fucking up safety inspections for years now.

This is a good article explaining the crashes which should have put several Boeing executives in prison. https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/22/18275736/boeing-737-max-plane-crashes-grounded-problems-info-details-explained-reasons

[-] TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Hasn't had an uncontrolled boom yet. Only controlled booms so far.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

A little surprising considering there was a helium valve leak they detected like a month ago that caused a scrub, but decided it wasn't worth taking it apart to fix, just send it and it will probably be fine.

[-] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

They investigated it and found out that the thrusters wouldn't stop working unless there were 3 more leaks of that size, or a single leak of 100x that size.
The affected thruster system is the backup for the backup for the system they actually use to maneuver.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Oh I'm aware of how small the issue is in comparison. It's just ridiculous that there is an issue like this at this point. They're almost a decade behind schedule, and received nearly double the funding of their direct competitor who has launched their comparable system nearly 30 times, with 13 crewed launches. They were supposed" to be the faster and more reliable option because of their legacy history, instead they've just shown that they really cannot compete in the modern launch market.

We need multiple options for redundancy, safety, and lowering or removing reliance on foreign launch capabilities... and this is just a terrible option in comparison.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

And helium is the least bad thing to have leak into your ship

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 8 points 5 months ago
[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Hopefully it doesn't fall apart or Boeing does not assassinate someone

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

It is about time! I was ready for 5 more scrubs.

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
83 points (93.7% liked)

News

23305 readers
3561 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS